Anonymous
05 April 2010 at 20:15
Is 'will' a legal document. Does it require any kind of registration.
If a 'will' is there, is it necessary to obtain the legal heirship certificate. Also, is the 'will' taken into consideration when the legal heirship certificate is provided.
What is to be done when legal heirship and letter of consent is asked for, inspite of having a will.
shrikant chede
05 April 2010 at 20:09
URGENT
RESPECTED MEMBERS,
ONE OF OUR EMPLOYEE A CONSTUCTED HOUSE AT NAGPUR AND FOR THAT TOOK LOAN FROM CREDIT COOPRATIVE SOCIETY FOR THE EMPLOYEES OF OFFICE ,EMPLOYEE A CLAIM BENIFIT U/SEC24-A AND 80 -C AS PER INCOME TAX ACT 1961 THE OFFICE REFUSE TO GIVE BENIFITAS ABOVE AND ADVISE EMPLOYEE GET RETURN FROM INCOME TAX DEPARMENT MY QUESTION IS
1) WHETHER IS IT MANDATORY TO CONFER/GRANT BENIFIT AS CLAIMED ABOVE
2)IS THE ACTION OF MY IS LEGAL
suman
05 April 2010 at 20:08
respected sir sri. Raj Kumar Makkad thanks for the valuable advice.
I am filing a case in the rent control court. Can i claim rent seperately for all the 3 organisations from the period it was illegally registered?
I am thinking of filing criminal cases to surpass all the future litigations .
Can I book a case with the police for obtaining loans on fradulent names 2. false sworn statement 3, false addresses on the net.
Sir pl clarify.
Indebted to you Sir.
Anonymous
05 April 2010 at 20:06
URGENT
RESPECTED MEMBERS,
ONE OF OUR EMPLOYEE A CONSTUCTED HOUSE AT NAGPUR AND FOR THAT TOOK LOAN FROM CREDIT COOPRATIVE SOCIETY FOR THE EMPLOYEES OF OFFICE ,EMPLOYEE A CLAIM BENIFIT U/SEC24-A AND 80 -C AS PER INCOME TAX ACT 1961 THE OFFICE REFUSE TO GIVE BENIFITAS ABOVE AND ADVISE EMPLOYEE GET RETURN FROM INCOME TAX DEPARMENT MY QUESTION IS
1) WHETHER IS IT MANDATORY TO CONFER/GRANT BENIFIT AS CLAIMED ABOVE
2)IS THE ACTION OF MY OFFICE IS LEGAL
Anonymous
05 April 2010 at 20:04
URGENT
RESPECTED MEMBERS,
ONE OF OUR EMPLOYEE A CONSTUCTED HOUSE AT NAGPUR AND FOR THAT TOOK LOAN FROM CREDIT COOPRATIVE SOCIETY FOR THE EMPLOYEES OF OFFICE ,EMPLOYEE A CLAIM BENIFIT U/SEC24-A AND 80 -C AS PER INCOME TAX ACT 1961 THE OFFICE REFUSE TO GIVE BENIFITAS ABOVE AND ADVISE EMPLOYEE GET RETURN FROM INCOME TAX DEPARMENT MY QUESTION IS
1) WHETHER IS IT MANDATORY TO CONFER/GRANT BENIFIT AS CLAIMED ABOVE
2)IS THE ACTION OF MY IS LEGAL
Member (Account Deleted)
05 April 2010 at 19:53
POLICE CUSTODY OF SAME ACCUSED IN SEVEN CRIMINAL CASES FILED IN SAME POLICE STATION.AND SEVEN STILL PENDING INVESTIGATION ACCUSED IN POLICE CUSTODY FOR MORE THAN 20 DAYS AND FURTHR CUSTODY PRAYED IN PENDING SEVEN CRIMINAL CASES.LEGAL,JUST AND PROPER ?
1.ACCUSED IS ARRESTED IN SEVEN CRIMINAL CASES UNDER SECTION 379 ,34 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE.
2.SAME POLICE STATION ARRESTED ACCUSED IN ONE CASE, THEN THE MOMENT ACCUSED WAS TAKEN IN MAGISTRATES CUSTODY ,POLICE MOVED TRANSFER APPLICATION IN ANOTHER PENDING CRIMINAL CASE IN SAME POLICE STATION.ACCUSED TRANSFERED TO JAIL AND AGAIN TAKEN IN TO CUSTODY BY POLICE IN THE MORNING AND DEMANDED POLICE CUSTODY OF ACCUSED IN SECOND CRIME AT SAME POLICE STATION.THE MOMENT ACCUSED WAS TAKEN IN TO MAGISTRATES CUSTODY .POLICE SUBMITED TRANSFER APPLICATION IN THIRD CRIME AT SAME POLICE STATION .
3 THIS PROCEDURE CONTINUED AND ACCUSED WAS TRANSFERED ALMOST SEVEN TIMES ONE AFTER ANOTHER IN SEVEN CRIMINAL CASES IN SAME POLICE STATION.
4.FURTHER POLICE ARE THREATENING ACCUSED AND HIS RELATIVES OF TRANSFERING THE SAME ACCUSED IN FURTHER SEVEN CASES.THE RELATIVES OF ACCUSED ARE HARASSED DUE TO ALMOST MORE THAN 20 DAYS POLICE CUSTODY OF SAME ACCUSED IN SEVEN CASES AND FURTHER REMAINING SEVEN CASES .
IT IS A FACT THAT ONCE ANY CRIMINAL COMPLAINT IS FILED UNDER ANY SECTION OF I.P.C. SAY 379 , THE DATA IS KEPT ON COMPUTER AND THE MOMENT ANY INNOCENT PERSON IS ARRESTED MERELY ON THE BASIS OF DOUBT THEN ALL SUCH PENDING CRIMINAL CASES ARE DUMPED ON THE HEAD OF SAID ACCUSED AND PENDING INVESTIGATION FILES ARE CLOSED BY SENDING THE NAME OF SAME ACCUSED IN ALL SUCH PENDING CRIMINAL CASES BY SENDING REMAND APPLICATIONS TO COURT AND SENDING CHARGE SHEETS ON THE BASIS OF DOUBT.
THIS IS THE WAY POLICE DEPT MISUSES THE LAW PROVISIONS AND NEED STRICT CONTROL BY JUDICIARY ,HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVISTS AND LAW MAKERS PLEASE NOTE.
5.FOR REDUCING THE TENSION OF RELATIVES OF ACCUSED,I CONVINCED THE RELATIVES OF ACCUSED FOR LEGAL REMEDY AND NOW REMEDY OF APPROACHING DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT AND HIGH COURT IS SUGGESTED AND IS IN PROCESS.
I HAD EVEN EARLIER GOT ACQUITAL OF ONE ACCUSED IN ALMOST FIVE CASES UNDER SECTION 379 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE AS NOT A SINGLE CASE WAS PROVED.THE INNOCENT PERSON WAS LABLED AS ACCUSED AND WAS DUMPED IN JAIL FOR SEVERAL MONTHS AS POOR PERSON COULD NOT EVEN FURNISH SURETY FOR RELEASE ON BAIL.HENCE HIS TRIAL WAS EXPEDIATED AND I GOT HIM ACQUITED BY SINCERELY DEFENDING HIS CASE.
6 THIS IS FOR INFORMATION OF ALL LEGAL EXPERTS AND THE CONCERNED MEMBERS TO NOTE AND COMMENT PLEASE.
THE NEGLECTED INNOCENT PERSONS NEED URGENT ATTENTION OF LAW MAKERS AND JUDICIARY ,LEGAL EXPERTS AND ALL CONCERNED.PLEASE NOTE AND COMMENT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
NANDKUMAR B.SAWANT.M.COM.LL.B.(MUMBAI),ADVOCATE
MOBILE.9271971251
e.mail.adv.nbsawant@yahoo.co.in
e.mail.nandkumarbs@sify.com
Neeraj Kaushal
05 April 2010 at 19:49
I have filed suit for permanent injunction against 3 defendants restraining them from raising any type of construction over the suit land , at the time of filing suit two defendants are serving in Indian army and they are not present at the time of cause of action , whether civil proceedings can be initiate against that person not present at the time of cause of action . I have written in my pleading that defendants are digging the suit land for raising construction and i have also mentioned it in my cause of action para , please guide me with citations,
bhanu pratap720
05 April 2010 at 19:47
there is an unregistered family agreement. the wishes of the testator has been carried out and the petitioner is in possession. mutation application moved under section 34 of u.p. land revenue act but rejected . reason given is that it was necessary to file a suit under sec 176 of up zamindari abolition act , 1951. appeals under Ss 210 and 219 also rejected on same grounds. the argument here is that a family settlement should be construed liberally even if is unregistered . and secondly the petitioner is in possession and others co sharers have no objection. hence the judgment order passed by the lower authorities should be set aside by a writ of certiorari. KINDLY PROVIDE ME WITH CASE LAWS ON THE FOLLOWING POINT. I WILL BE EXTREMELY GRATEFUL
Rajini Sunderraj
05 April 2010 at 19:35
Sir,
My husband is an NGO. He is a President,founder and chairman of 3 NGO's registered with the govt of TN.
I am a Govt servant working as a teacher in TN. My husband wants me to be the "TREASURER" of the organisation to avoid misuse of funds in the org.
1) My query is, can I become the Treasurer ( office Bearer) continuing the same full time Govt. teacher job?
2) My colleagues say that one should not be the President of more than one NGO, Is it true. If YES what should my husband do.
Pl guide us on the following.
Smt. Rajini sunderraj
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Please give me your suggestion
abc