I am cousel oof accused contesting 138 case
The complainant provide a set of document to me in which the notice (send by complainannt) is differ than the notice attached to the record of court...
charges are framed
the matter is pending for evidence but the chief is not filed since last 3 days.
whether i raise the objection ?
whether I filed dischrge application at this stage ?
pls guide if any with case laws
thanks
What is meant by Adverse Possession ?
When and who is entitled to filed ?
Pls reply with example
urgently..................
thanks
Anonymous
10 April 2010 at 07:50
Hi,I would like to know that if a Scheduled Caste Girl marries an upper caste men, then whether she can claim benefits under reservation.
In a suit for demarcation of a property can an application for appointment of advocate commissioner along with a surveyor is entertainable ?
Anonymous
10 April 2010 at 00:07
Respected members,
Can anyone provide the ruling/citation or any article on "Boundary prevails over area of the land". Land is identified by the boundary it keeps." If there is discrepancy over area, boundary shall prevail" Etc.
THanks to all.
FIR u/s 489B and C
accused is Father A and son B
case history
A is work hendover to B
60000/-Rs take and go bank of baroda and save the amount three accound first a/c in 25,000/ Rs Second a/c 25,000/-Rs and third a/c in 35,000/-Rs his family member in a/c gujrat. B is active in this work and first a/c save, second a/c 35,000/- 70 note 500 rs and deposit slip give the bank cashier after counting 26 nos 500/- Rs note thear is non origenal not then ask cashier to B where is take this mony, B said truth give the mony his father, Bank manager Reporting police station and large FIR. plice Enquari start and A house in surching 8,50,000/- original note in 7 nos 500 note non original note Total 500 nos note 32 notes. police arrest A and B. and firs bail reject to A in ADJ court
Final Report is put-up against court by police
my Q is I apply second bail application only A for or both
any citetion in this bail metter pls help me.
as per the preamble of our constitution, ours is socialistic character...that means the natural resources and means of production shall not be in the hands of a single or group of private people?
the state is only the custodian of the natural resources to see that every person should get his due share.but the state is not the owner.in this light of socialist phylosophy, how a state or it's agency acquire the land or other natural resource and hand over to the private party? by means of this the persons may get shortage or polluted or under quality of the natural resources without which the life is in danger. the state is not come under the violation of human rights? who has to monitor and control it?
In any investigation, the judiciary is relying upon the State or it's agencies to collect the evidence, in the adjudication process. but as per the principles of natural justice, the State is not come under the bias, in cases against the state?
how the judiciary shall rely the State and it's agencies, in the adjudication process?
why not it suggest to have an independent institutional mechanism for adjudication process, with checks & measures, if any required?
Rights on Ancestral property
I am Nagaraju B. 2 Years back I bought built house from one person. He has two sons and daughter. During registration he, his wife and son signed on registration papers. Now I got notice from his daughter on serve number: 120. The house i bought comes under the serve no: 120.She is claiming that it was there ancestral property.
Under serve no: 120 there are many vacant plats. The have sold all of them. This property came from her grand parents. Some please suggest me how to react in this situation.it's urgent.Paying heavy loan every month is paining.She is also got married.