Arvind Singh Chauhan
23 April 2010 at 18:23
Sir my client was ordered to pay Rs 300/- pm to wife, at the time when the maximum maintenance amount was up to Rs 500/-(before the new amendment in Cr.P.C.). Now the new amendment has come in to effect, having maintenance limit up to Rs 5000/- according to Uttarakhand's stete amendment. My client's wife has applied to court for enhancement for Rs 2000/-.
Sir I am of the opinion that, because maintenance awarded earlier was according to old provision which might be maximum Rs 500/-. New amendment should not be applied here, having no specific clause in amendment Act. Now court can enhance only up to Rs 500.
Am I wrong or right ? please suggest. Sir if I am right please suggest the law or citation if any, that I may satisfy to court.
Anonymous
23 April 2010 at 17:03
Que.1.Dear Experts, If Respondent doesn't turn up for the First Hearing the Court would pronounce Ex-Parte Judgement, but What if the Petitioner himself nor the advocate for the Petitioner is attending after attending for 5(Five) hearings for thier Divorce Suit , What would or should the Judge do to my counters?
sarat kumar nayak
23 April 2010 at 16:49
One of my relative facing a problem. Problem is that. Many days ago she had put a file for Housing Loan purpose in AXIS Bank through a agent. Very saidly that deal had canceled but file not return from the bank . She had already forgate that thing some body chinting that . Any body open two saving account with the AXIS bank & doing the transaction of Rs.40Lacs . She knews through IT Department when her file selected the file in Srutny. Income tax office impose Tax of that Rs.58000/- . She go to Apeal through a chartared Accountants. He advise her to complain to Bank or the Opening Documents . RBI send her the documents very trasadicaly the documents were original & also Sign. of that fellow was original . Now situation is that the Chartared accountant said i will not continue the case because the case was not fevor of you.
What is your suggestion of that situation . That fellow is very poor & ignore of low
vasantha
23 April 2010 at 16:40
My grand father purchased agriculture land Tamilnadu in 1941. Grand father died on 1954. Govt Revenu records show my grand mother name but Registered document has my grand father name. He has 4 daughters and 2 sons. I am Son's daughter. All my aunts are married before 1989 and died except one. Survving aunty filed civil suit on us to get 1/6 in agriculture land. My aunts has right to claim on that property ? Tamil nadu HSA 1989 law says female marreid before 1989 does not have rights. But Centre goverment HSA act 2005 says female has birght rights on father property. Which Act prevail n Tamilnadu?
Please clarify
Gaurav
23 April 2010 at 16:07
Dear Experts,
My father died last month in Delhi in my home. We did his last rites (funeral)in my home town in Mathura.
We applied for his death certificate in Mathura, where Nagarpalika has objected on issuing death certifiacate citing reasons that since death has taken place in Delhi hence death certificate will be issued from Delhi only.
Can anyone guide me as from where I would get death certificate & what is the process in such suitations.
Thank you in advance.
regards,
Gaurav
PrnBCRBant
23 April 2010 at 15:38
Dear Sir,
My Client is purchaser of a flat which is under construction & the builder is financed by a Public sector Bank & the land & Building under construction has been mortgaged to the above bank. Now as i am also a panel member of the same bank & above said, my client wants to purchase a flat in the said apratment. what all points to be noted while issuing a legal opinion so that purchaser of the flat under construction can obtain a loan for purchase of the said flat.
if possible give me a format of such legal opinions.
Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
23 April 2010 at 15:20
Please provide with basic concept of conducting Agreement.
Whether nature of business can be changed under conducting Agreement?
Wherher the name of business can be changed under conducting Agreement?
LK Salecha
23 April 2010 at 14:30
My client has issued blank dated cheque to his supplier as security cheque on 31may2009 for Rs.7 lakhs,to be used if my clients client does not pay to the supplier on due dates.My clients client paid on two occasions on 8 june 2009 Rs two lakhs & 12 july 2009 Rs. two lakhs.On 16 july 2009 my clients supplier presents the cheque for Rs.7 lakh. Cheque dishonours due to insufficient fund. My client's supplier sends thru lawyer a legal notice. My client does not reply. Now they have filed court case under negotiable instrument act 138.
My client didnot owe to his supplier Rs.7 lakh on 16 july, as Rs.4 lakh was paid before cheque presentation date.
Can this case be dismissed as my client's supplier has presented the cheque for amount, my client did not owe.
Anonymous
23 April 2010 at 14:21
Myself (man) and my father are joint owners of a commercial property.
* Can we give this property to my wife [my father's Daughter-in-law (Bahu)] by way of Relinquishment deed (the most cost effective way)?
* Or such a deed is not possible from father-in-law to daughter-in-law and is only possible in blood relations?
If above is not possible then what are the alternatives and some idea on costs please.
There is no problem between fammily members and they can sign as witnesses.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
cheque bounce
I have purchased one site in Bangalore with the mutual agreement with site owner, the total cost of site is 700000 lacks and 600000 lacks paid in cash while register time and the remaining amount paying in later and I register the site. after registration . still he was not given position to me and he saying remaining amount paying immediately then only I will get the position. but now my financial condition is very bad because of my dad get admitted in the hospital for a heart surgery. his knowing my condition he presented cheque to bank without telling me and in the bank insufficient cash the cheque get bounce. so keeping this reason his telling me to re-register site to his name and he will pay the 600000 lack back to me otherwise he will going to file the case against me (keeping cheque bounce slip)and he saying he will take back the site without paying any amount to me, because his intention is to take back the site to his name. now the market value of that site is 1200000 lacks. so I request please advice on this anybody, thank you, deepu