Anonymous
27 June 2010 at 17:13
whethere plaintiff can be examine as defendants witness
whether defendant can call plaintiff to give eveidence as d.w
sudha
27 June 2010 at 16:47
Dear Sir
-My Parents have two houses ( one each)
-My mother wanted to gift me the house in her name as she cannot repay the loan on the house.
-I repaid the loan (by cash) in 1998.
-in 2003 my mother ,executed a gift deed in my name (Non Conditional) and I was paying taxes on the house through bank.(I did not change the property Tax Name) but left the documents with her.
-Now I came to know that she has cancelled the deed without our knowledge and wants to give it to her son after her demise.
Kindly answer my query
1)Can she cancel the gift deed without my knowledge(she is a pensioner and has sufficient funds in her name).
2)How do I need to respond legally on this issue.
Anonymous
27 June 2010 at 15:50
Mr X is very disturbed and anguished about continued misbehavior, irresponsible conduct of his son and decides to give a public notice to disown his son, his wife and their children and debarr them from all of Mr X,s movable and immovable properties and sever all the relationship ties with his son and his wife including his children. Is it essential that Mr X has to dissolve his existing partnership firm in which Mr. X and his son happen to hold 50:50 profit sharing.
pratik
27 June 2010 at 15:00
(b) other non- testamentary instruments which purport or operate to create, declare, assign, limit or extinguish,
1. Sub- section (1) of s. 14, rep. by the A. O. 1937.
whether in present or in future, any right, title or interest, whether vested or contingent, of the value of one hundred rupees and upwards, to or in immovable property;
What do u mean by vested or contingent interest as per the above said act & also as per the trasnfer of property act, 1882 with the example(S)(S)(S)(S)(S).
Pls answer the query & dont write which is not relate to the queries this statement i have to write becasuse some of he learned members write any thing whichis not related to the querie(S). Also i apologize to whom it is directed hearted.
Thanking u all experts in advance.
pratik
27 June 2010 at 14:29
Respected Learned Members,
I don't know that why my queries are not answered but than also i am posting my queries under thisite & forum.
1)As per section 18(cc)of the Registration Act, 1908 What it says that if the value is less than 100 but if the value is more than 100 than we have to register. Pls tell me that i am right or not. Means If the court decree is more than rs.100 than we have to registered as per the presecribed section & the said act.Whether it is kind or cash.
cc)2[ instruments transferring or assigning any decree or order of a Court or any award when such decree or order or award purports or operates to create, declare, assign, limit or extinguish, whether in present or in future, any right, title or interest, whether vested or contingent, of a value less than one hundred rupees, to or in immovable property;]
2)2) Also as per section 89(4) First the revenue officer defination is not define under the said act. & also i would like to known the defination of the revenue officer as per the registration act, 1908 because i think the public auction done as per the SAFARSI Act & the person or any authority whether goverment or private whoever autions the immovable property are also known as revenue officer as per the section 89(4) & the said act. Also i would like to known that the sales made under the SAFARSI Act & the certificate given to the buyer of the property should also registered it & the copy of it should also be submitted as per the section 89(4) of the said act. I think the buyer has to submitt the copy pls clarify by abovementioned querys that whether i am right or wrong.
(4) Every Revenue- officer granting a certificate of sale to the purchaser of immovable property sold by public auction shall send a copy of the certificate to the registering officer within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the whole or any part of the property comprised in the certificate is situate, and such officer shall file the copy in his Book No. 1.
Thanking u all experts in advance.
Anonymous
27 June 2010 at 13:57
Dear Sir,
I am an architect practicing in Bangalore. I was doing a house for a couple from delhi in bangalore. We have an agreement on letterhead and received an advance. We worked for four months preapring the design, gettting the drawings sanctioned, and getting tenders, finalisation with contractors complete, ready to start work at site. Then they call me to tell me that they have terminated the agreement since they have abandoned the project. They promise to pay for the stages met. But once I sent them the bill they refused to do so. We a small freelance firm and cannot take this liability. We have a copy of signed agreement, a copy of a signed sanction drawings and copy of signed contract document of the contractor. Is there a legal chance of pursuing it it court? Kindly let me know. Thank you
S. Rajagopalan
27 June 2010 at 13:34
Dear Sir,
I want to know whether provident fund deduction needs to be made on Arrears salary paid.
regards
S.rajagopalan
tusharcosmic
27 June 2010 at 13:17
I became two days late in paying a balance of Rs.400/- for my SBI credit card,they have charged me Rs. 600/- late fee and denied to waive off after three consecutice requests.
I wonder under which law they can charge me such a big penalty for such a small amount apart from the settled monthly interest.
Do RBI/Govt. permits them to do so ?
Category
kulkarni
27 June 2010 at 12:47
We are staying in an rented room in old Wada ( Old building)in pune for last 33 years.Now the owner is selling the wada to a builder. For the same the owner is threatening us to vacat the room otherwise he is saying he will send a legal notice.We do not have alternative place to stay ,also there is no bonafide need of the owner to stay as all remaing rooms are already vacant.we are the only tenant staying in one room.Please advise what we should do?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Non Life General Insurance Claim for Permanent Disability
I met with an accident and got permanent disability of 45%.Vehichle in which i was going covers under general insurance policy from National insurance company. In the Policy cover note, it is clarly written thatpolicy covers “unnamed passengers number 9, amount 100000 per person” But company refused for any claim and said claim is applicable for 100 % permanent disability not for 45% permanent disability. I want to know whether i am eligible for the claim from National Insurance company or not.