Anonymous
22 March 2019 at 14:55
Superannuated in Feb,2017 as AGM from CWC. File case before ALC Delhi for relaese of withhold amount Rs.58500 in the name of overstay in Government flat, the fact that it was an act of revange, the notice /order was issued on 14.3.2016 for recovery of dues with retrospective effect from 26.01/2016. The letter has many other infirmities like date 26.01.2016 is mentioned as 26.02.2016 stating that permission to stay in flat was granted upto that date.
All application even the orders of CIC were responded in a manner hiding that fact.
Second was the reimbursement of telephone/mobile charges. The deceptive policy imtepreted to deny rightful claims as if it was mendatory to purchase a new mobile with corporation money to get reimbursement of service/user charges.
Third was the non reimbursement of LTC claim: the reason cited was the ticket of air travel /entitled class from(Make my trip),other then authorized agent. The amount paid to IRCTC and State Road transport and even the base fare of Air India, JET Airways not reimbursed.
ALC refused to entertain the case, stating that his Jurisdiction is in the matter related to workmen and no for the officers/ supervisors. I had already exhausted all departmental / ministerial redressal channels.
What options do I have. Should I move to labour court or to Civil Court or to High Court.
aishwarya vucha
22 March 2019 at 10:48
sir my friend ritu took loan of rs 1 lakh from geeta but in promissory note it is mentioned that ritu shall repay back rs 1 lakh to geeta . SILENT ABOUT INTEREST and no mention of it . now geeta is claiming interest . her contention is there is no express mention that " no interest will be charged " in note so is it deemed that interest payable
at your mercy
22 March 2019 at 08:52
The society management called a GB and the quorum was 17 out of 178 members. They appointed themselves and are said to have forged documents to bank to take over control of accounts. AS MEMBERS, CAN WE GET THE COPIES FROM Bank to verify before taking any further action?
Please advise
vallabh_raut
21 March 2019 at 21:56
Dear Experts,
My brother's wife has filed case of Domestic Violence against all of us. We are fighting it in person. The (Respondents') evidence stage is about to finish. Before closing the evidence, we want to submit some documents like NC's and a FIR she filed against us. She has already produced the same documents before the court while filing her application. But they are all xerox copies. Even we wanted to submit certified copies of the same documents.
Now, will the documents she submitted with the application be exhibited and read as evidence if we admit them? Or the documents must be in certified form to be exhibited and read as evidence?
Naveen kumar
21 March 2019 at 20:19
Please suggest. This is regarding partition deed
My grand father's have 5 children's 2son's and 3daughters,
2sons(A&B) and grand father makes partition deed for the property and settlement deed with daughters with cash in the year 2004.
First point -they made partition deed based on previous partition deed(panchayat paarikath) was done by my grandfather and his brother in year 80's..that time Katha was in the name of my great grand father.
Second point- here first son(A) scheduled property which was mentioned in partition deed was next to govt land. because of mistakes done by govt in records of Pahani, it was showing in govt name but we put case and won the case success fully.
third point - after winning the case now Katha and pahani in the name of my grand father and his brother jointly.
(note my grandfather share only we made partition deed) . Now because of changed Katha, survey number also been changed and 1 gunta land also varied( means 30 gunta became 31 )
Here my father(A) is one of the son of my grandfather, But now my uncle (B) that is second son of my grand father is making problem by asking share in my father's part or again he wants to make partition in other way.
This partition deed is registered in sub registered only.
Can my father go ahead and makes property into his name by providing registered deed.
Anonymous
21 March 2019 at 20:14
A society had given permission for use of duct space as a passage to move between two adjoining flats separated by the duct space without any financial precondition.
After 5years of the above permission, the society is now insisting on taking rent for the use of the duct space.
Can the society charge such rent once permission is given without ant financial precondition after many years?
Sanjay Deshpande
21 March 2019 at 16:18
I am third party possessor
Sanjay Deshpande
21 March 2019 at 16:10
How to stop possession order
Suraj Kumar
21 March 2019 at 14:32
Sir,
Govt. Of India introduce NPS for those employee who joins from 01.01.2004.
Following matters seems unconstitutional.
1.As per Constitution of India
"39. The State shall, in particular, direct its policy
towards securing�
(a) that the citizens, men and women equally, have
the right to an adequate means of livelihood;
(b) that the ownership and control of the material
resources of the community are so distributed as best
to subserve the common good;
(c) that the operation of the economic system does
not result in the concentration of wealth and means
of production to the common detriment;
(d) that there is equal pay for equal work for both
men and women;"
But those employees joins on or after 01.01.2004 gets 90 percent of salary compared to those employees who are under Old Pension Scheme gets 100 percent of their salary; as 10 percent salary of NPS employees goes to pension fund.
It seems for equal work NPS employees deprived by 10 less salary.
Is it unconstitutional ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Payment of interest on statutory retiral benefits
Superannuated in Feb. 2017 from Regional Office. Mumbai of CWC, Delhi. The statutory payments namely Contributory Provident Fund. Gratuity and Terminal leave benefits were delayed by the Corporation on the grounds that leave files pertaining to period 1989-92 were not traceable in their office.
On intervention of ALC the payments were released but after a gap of 4 to 7 months. ALC passed orders to pay interest @ 10% on gratuity for the period of delay, no relief was however considered /granted on delayed payment of CPF and TLB.
Appeal decided by Dy.Chief Labour Commissioner turned down the request for payment of interest @ of 18% in line with the orders of Hon`ble High Court/ CAT in many similar cases. Further no mention was made why the payment of interest not tenable for delayed payment of CPF and TLB.
What should be appropriate course for me to get justice.