V.V.Ramadas
23 July 2018 at 23:43
Dear Sir/Madam.
In a Partition suit the advocate for defendant has not taken plea for , barred by limitation,non-joinder necessary part, no cause of action and non-payment of proper court fee etc but at the stage of appeal the appellant taken all the above pleas and during the pendency of appeal the respondent -plaintiff has filed additional evidence( filed a new ROR-Patta where in the name of appellants daughter is find place) under order 41 Rule 27 C.P.C and the same is allowed. Can the advocate for the appellant file a petition for remand of the suit to the lower court with a permission for amendment of the pleadings as the it changed facts of the appeal.
Anonymous
23 July 2018 at 21:20
अंतर्गत धारा 143 एवं 164 जेड0ए0 एल0आर0एक्टः-
रेहननामें के आधार पर भूमि के मालिक द्वारा क्रमशः 3 नम्बरो पर कब्जा व मालिकाना हक 1966 में हमारे पिता जी को दे दिया गया था, रेहननामें में दो लोगों को गवाह भी बनाया गया था। 1989 में भूमि के पूर्व मालिक की मृत्यु के पश्चात उनके पुत्रों द्वारा 1993 में मालिकाना हक के लिए मुकदमा दायर कर दिया गया, जिसमें 1993 में सुलहनामे के आधार पर पुनः भूमि पर स्वामित्व हमारा माना गया। सुलह नामें में हमें एक नम्बर पर अपना स्वत्व रखते हुए दो नम्बरों पर अपना अधिकार छोडने की शर्त रखी गयी। जिसे हमारे पिता द्वारा मान लिया गया। तत्पश्चात प्रतिपक्षी द्वारा पुनः 1994 में मुकदमा दायर किया गया और 1995 में पुनः सुलहनामें में भूमि पर हमारा स्वत्व स्वीकार किया। 1995 में पुनः पूर्व भूमालिक के पुत्रों में से एक के पुत्र अर्थात पौत्र ने एक अपंजीकृत वसीयत के आधार पर अपील किया कि उसके दादा ने उसे उक्त विवादित नम्बर को उसे वसीयत किया है। जिस पर पुनः 1998 में अदालत द्वारा आदेश पारित करते हुए पुनः हमारा स्वामित्व स्वीकार किया और प्रतिपक्षी की अपील खारिज करते हुए हमारी प्रापर्टी पर प्रतिपक्षी द्वारा किसी प्रकार का हस्तक्षेप न करने का आदेश पारित किया । कोर्ट द्वारा हमारे पक्ष में इंजक्शन स्यूट //स्थायी निषेधाज्ञा// और इजरा का आदेश भी किया जा चुका है।
प्रतिवादी द्वारा पुनः तजबीजशानी प्रार्थना पत्र 2008 में विलम्ब से दाखिल करते हुए सबूतों एवं रूलिंग की समस्त प्रतियों को हमारी पत्रावली से गायब करवा दिया गया और बिना हमारा पक्ष सुने कोर्ट द्वारा 1998 के आदेश को निरस्त करते हुए तजबीजशानी प्रार्थना पत्र को स्वीकार कर लिया गया। तत्पश्चात हमारे द्वारा राजस्व परिषद इलाहाबाद में अपील किया गया जिसमें अदालत द्वारा प्रतिपक्षी की तजबीजशानी अपील को कालवाधित मानते हुए और गुण दोषों के आधार पर हमारे पक्ष में निर्णय देते हुए 1998 का आदेश जो हमारे पक्ष में था पुनः कायम कर दिया गया ।
प्रतिपक्षी द्वारा पुनः हाईकोर्ट में अपील कर उक्त आदेश पर स्टेटस को ले लिया गया है।
अब हमारे द्वारा इसमें क्या कार्यवाही किया जाना चाहिए? मार्गदर्शन करें ।
rakesh mittal
23 July 2018 at 20:46
Sir,
the apyment cheque will be refunds after case 138 is sure. beacuse paid the stamp duty for file case and adovate with refunds or only cheque amount
Anonymous
23 July 2018 at 19:39
I was doing business fronm a firm in delhi.
AS I wanted to pay the amount after receiving the material , i was asked to pay rs 30000
undated cheque in the name of propritor . so he can send the material and receive the full payment in the firm name after receipt of the material. the business continue for 2 years.
in one of last assignment he send the water instead of material which my retail customer returned to me.mean time I have made payment of all invoices raised by the firm in the firm a/c by NIFT. when I told him about defetive material returnd by my retail coustomer
he denied to make any compensation towards the same.
NOw I decided not to do any business in future with him and asked to return the undated cheque of rs 30000 with him. But instead of returning he told me that cheque is misplaced and not tracable. on this I asked my bank to stop the payment for that
cheque no on 15/06/2018(bank acceptance letter of this instruction is with me). But he
putting the date on cheque of 18/06/2018 presented the cheque in his bank which obviosly got dishonered due to my instruction of stop payment on 15.06.2018
Now I have received A legal notice FROm his lawyer with out showing any liablity and just mentioning the cheque dishonered and presumption that there should be liability.
As this is cheating and blackmailing and misuse of negotiable instrument act,breach of trust what remedy I have to reply for this notice as there is no legal liability and debt outstanding against me and he was just holding a undated cheque given for encahment if there is some delay on payment
Anonymous
23 July 2018 at 19:11
My salary is 30000 per month i get salary in my account and it comes half half so how to show my salary proof of financial year give some idea
Anonymous
23 July 2018 at 18:28
Hi, I work in a MNC which works 5 days in a week.
I would like to know whether am eligible for applying gratuity.
DOJ - 19/12/13. LWD - 2/8/18.
Please help me out on this.
SHYAMSUNDER BUBNA
22 July 2018 at 19:25
IN ORDER DATED 10TH MARCH 2015 THE HON'BLE COURT DIRECTED THE COURT RECEIVER TO PROCEED WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE THREE CONVEYANCES INCLUDING THE CONVEYANCE OF THE SAID FLAT IN FAVOUR OF THE PLAINTIFF OR HIS NOMINEES ON THE BASIS OF UNDERTAKING TO INDEMNIFY THE COURT RECEIVER IN RELATION TO ANY CLAIMS THAT MAY BE MADE HEREINAFTER AGAINST HIM ON ACCOUNT OF EXECUTION OF TRANSFER DEEDS AND CONVEYANCES IN THIS FASHION, AND THE SAID UNDERTAKING IS ACCEPTED AS AN UNDERTAKING TO THE COURT.
THE NOMINEE OF THE PURCHASER IN FURTHERANCE OF ORDER DATED 10.03.2015 HEREBY UNDERTAKE TO INDEMNIFY THE COURT RECEIVER IN RELATION TO ANY CLAIMS THAT MAY BE AGAINST COURT RECEIVER ON ACCOUNT OF EXECUTION OF TRANSFER DEEDS, FORMS AND CONVEYANCES IN THIS FASHION AND THIS UNDERTAKING IS AN UNDERTAKING TO THE HON'BLE COURT.
An agreement for sale of Flat No. 401/401A along with Stilt Parking in Basement of Benhur Apartment has been executed on 28th August 2017 by you in favor alleged Nominee of Plaintiff/Auction Purchaser M/s. Oomerbhoy Investments Pvt. Ltd. along with confirming parties. This is pertinent to note that Nominee of any party must be individuals and not the Corporate Body. Nominee a person in whose name title to real estate or ownership of stock is held but who is not the actual proprietor or holder.
rajesh patil
21 July 2018 at 17:52
Sir
i have purschasing the 1 acre land in the mangaon ,roha,MAHARASHTRA .
This land sell by EXPAT PROPERTIES,BANGLOR BASE COMPANY
WE HAVE PAID THE PAYMENT THRU INSTALMENT ,NOW THE TIME PEROID IS OVER ON DEC 2018
THE COMPANY ADVISE US THIS EMAIL : " Accordingly Expat as an organization has to comply by these rules "
CAN YOU ADVIS THE AGRICULTARAL LAND IS COMES UNDER MAHARERA / RERA ACT
PLEASE GUIDE ACCORDINGLY
gopinathan
21 July 2018 at 10:13
Madras HC has ordered for CBI enquiry to find out the fact of loss of 100 n more case bundles from retired justice Mr Mathivanan who retired in May 2017. My Crl. OP is also among one. My petition was allowed n disposed on 22.5.2017 by him. But still order not received more than a year. Hence I couldn't re enter into my govt job n get salary. My question is
1) How long time this enquiry will take place
2) Is my order questionable Until enquiry finished
3)If my case bundle not traceable what will be next move
4) How I should compensate this
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Boundary litigation
My father had an property which purchased in 2000. At the time of purchase seller told us we have right received from ancestors that 25% in water well which is in neighbor's premises. The same was documented in paper also. But later the seller lost that right through some consideration ( approx 30 sq feet boundary space) which was not documented.
My father purchased the same and later buid the house in premises. And while building boundary wall the neighbors are objecting that the space belongs to them as the same was not documented bin paper.
What can we do now...? Request ur expert advive