practicing advocate
01 August 2018 at 11:13
Respected Learned Counsel,
One client came across to me and told me that police was refusing to register FIR as the opponent is residing outside the state and the incident took that place only then after approaching higher authority i had suggested to register zero FIR and that was transferred to that particular state and after completing all the procedure of recording statements of my client still the accused was not arrested then i told my client to approach women rights commission of that state and they have ensured my client that they will get her work done now my question is that being a lawyer how i can get this work done so that the accused get arrested.please suggest me with your valuable advice.
Member (Account Deleted)
01 August 2018 at 09:32
few years ago my wife filed a case sayingt that i was threatening to her life. i got bail. but i didnt receive a summon after that.
so i thought my my wife withdrew the case . So i didn't worry much. I recently came to know that she didnt withdraw the case also didnt want to run the case..I was told that she is not ready to spend any time for this case. i have to handle the case and close it on my own.
I checked and came to know the status is NBA. Do i need to appear in the court ?.. or arranging a lawyer is enough.
How to close this case.please advice me.
vaibhav
31 July 2018 at 16:02
May I get the information regarding the authority to whom to apply for NOC under emblems and names act 1950 for use of name of society to be registered under S R Act. 1860 in Maharashtra.
ANBALAGAN RAMIAH
31 July 2018 at 11:28
Sir,
As cited in the subject party has a patta with "நீர்பிடிப்பு தனித்தீர்வை" , and claims right for a irrigation from a channel. according to the cited party's patta with "நீர்பிடிப்பு தனித்தீர்வை" he has no right to claim irrigation from a channel it seems.
need help in understanding the meaning of the "நீர்பிடிப்பு தனித்தீர்வை" type patta issue by the government of tamilnadu.
Thank You,
Anbalagan.R
Hemant donde
31 July 2018 at 11:01
Dear Sir,
Good Morning.This is with reference to layout
made in the year 1981. Recent 2017 development plan of city indicates 2 nos of Primary School(P.S) for which plotting was done in 1981. But layout which I have got from one of the sale deed shows only 1
primary school. How to get confirmation about this .
Also when I looked for property cards, there are 4 open spaces according city survey which was done
in year 1999 where still my grandfathers name is present for 2 open space.But sale deed layout show
only 2 open space whose addition is 6000 m2. In layout of sale deed these 2 extra open space are plot
no 41 and 43 which have been acquired . My question is CITY SURVEY DATA AUTHENTIC OR 7/12 PRESERVED BY TALATHI ?
Thanks
Regards
Hemant Donde
priyanka
31 July 2018 at 10:16
Sir, I got court notice u/s 119/177, 187,184 under MV Act. What should I do? Bail required in this case.
DR.VEDULA GOPINATH
31 July 2018 at 09:28
dear learned colleagues
I shall be thankful to my colleagues for giving me the recent case references and reply 1. whether negative covenants of original contract shall continue in the prolonged contracts.. b. whether the contractor can claim extra amount in the extended period..
dr vedula gopinath advocate/arbitrator
pushpakrishna
31 July 2018 at 09:09
Dear experts
It seems that there is a change in the negotiable instruments act by the GOVERNAMENT that accused has to deposit 20 %of the cheque amount
Kindly let me have the ful details if it is convenient for you and also effects on false cases filed by the complainants on empty cheques mentioning a huge amounts to black mail the accused.
Thanq in advance..
9462340099
31 July 2018 at 00:24
Sir , complainant file 138 ni act complaint which is premature, now complainant withdrawl his complaint by permission of court for refill complaint on maturity
What is law about it ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Pay protection- service matter
Sir,
I am a permanent employee of Govt. of West Bengal. My present basic pay is Rs. 28,620/- (Band pay Rs. 22,020/- and Grade pay Rs. 6,600/-) in the Pay Band-4A (Rs.15,600-42,000/-).
Recently I have got an offer of appointment from a Central Govt. Undertaking Organisation where IDA pattern exist. The organisation while publishing the advertisement last year mentioned the Grade of the post will be E2A in the scale of pay of Rs. 24,900-50,500/- (IDA). Now, they are offering me the post in the scale of pay of Rs. 60,000-1,80,000/- in E3 as the wage revision has taken effect. In their offer letter they have mentioned that my initial basic pay will be Rs.60,000/- i.e. at the base level of the scale. Before appearing the exam I have been given NOC by my parent organisation.
It is also to mention that wage revision in my parent organisation i.e. in the Govt. of West Bengal is yet to finalise.
Now, if the organisation where I am willing to join would have not revised their pay, according to them my basic pay could have been fixed at the bottom of the scale i.e. Rs. 24,900/-, which is lower than what I receive in my parent organisation. Similarly, if my present organisation revise their scale of pay the pay will definitely be higher than Rs. 60,000/-, which they are offering me.
The main contention of the issue is the wage revision in my parent organisation is yet to finalise, whereas wage revision in the organisation where I am willing to join has given effect and therefore though my Basic Pay will increase but I believe I should have been get more than Rs.60,000/-.
Kindly suggest as to whether I can claim for pay protection and if yes, on what basis/how.
Regards,
Suman Biswas