Anonymous
15 March 2024 at 20:31
User
I am furnishing below the excerpts of agreement relating to the sharing of constructed area of a G+4 building under Joint Development Agreement between landowners and Developer.
EXCERPTS of Agreement:
Under Owner's allocation in Page 4 against point No.3 of the registered JDA, it is stated as under: That on construction of the multistoried building in the manner as stated hereinabove with qualitative materials the landowners shall jointly entitled to get as follows:
a) Owners will get 50 % of the entire sanctioned plan or constructed only.
b) The Owners will get the entire area of Second and Third floor and two Car Parking Spaces/ Garages measuring about 144 square feet Super Built-up area each which is within the Owner's allocation.
Based on the excerpts provided from the Joint Development Agreement (JDA), it appears that the landowners are entitled to 50% of the entire sanctioned plan or constructed area. Additionally, they are entitled to the entire area of the Second and Third floors, as well as two car parking spaces/garages measuring about 144 square feet each.
However, if the measurement of the constructed area exceeds or falls short of the agreed percentages, there are provisions for compensation or adjustment. If the garages are within the Owner's allocation, they would count towards the Owner's entitlement of 50% of the constructed area of the ground floor.
Therefore, it seems that the landowners are entitled to 50% of the constructed area, including the garages within their allocation, subject to the provisions for adjustments based on actual measurements. It would be advisable to consult with a legal expert to ensure the interpretation aligns with the specific terms and conditions of the agreement.
Kindly opine on the correctness of interpretation on the entitlement of landowners as 50% of the constructed area, as narrated above or otherwise, as the Developer disputes with the landowners as their entitlement on ground floor is only 288 sq ft.
mukesh
15 March 2024 at 17:52
Hello sir
I am from UP. I belongs to OBC(17 mbc). But in January 2014 UP govt included my caste in SC category that time i applied for caste certificate and got SC certificate issued by Tahsildar. And in June 2015 in took admission in UPs Govt Engineering College based on that Certificate because CSC centre told me it is genuine u can use it and College had accepted it with due document verification process they didn't raised any objections for complete duration of 4 year and i passed in 2019 and also recieved my BTECH Degree.
But at that time i was minor and not aware of.. All these legal subject and was not aware that there was an Court case PIL in HC against that Govt Oder in meantime govt halted it's decision and in July 2014 there was another govt order that as per HC proceeding all DMs must spot issuing SC certificate but there was nothing about already issued certificate.
High Court hearing continued till April 2017. And HC verdict was that State Govt is not entitled to include any caste in SC according art 341-42 and hence Jan 2014 Govt Order was cancelled. HC said that validity of already issued Caste certificate will be decided by State and Central Govt.
Sir as per whole story my question is that
Am I guilty of taking benifit of that Caste certificate because that certificate was issued by govt and not cancelled when i took admission?
Someone told me that My Degree can be cancelled in future if any one complaints... Is it possible?
I am very depressed about that because my whole career is based on that degree. I comes from very humble background my parents have invested all their money and everything for my education and i passed my engineering with Honors Degree due to my hard word and currently i am preparing for State Civil Service Examination and gives examination in my OBC category.
Please advise meðŸ™ðŸ™
Vasudevan
15 March 2024 at 12:43
Respected Learned Experts, I have leased out my premises to a Central Government Corporation for a period of 5 years. After the period of five years, I have demanded the revision of rent of 20% additional to the existing rate. The Officer in charge has refused to revise and orally informed that they shall vacate the premises. Even after the lapse of 1 year, they have neither renewed the lease nor vacated the premises. They are paying the old rent for the past 1 year directly to my account. In the above circumstances, how can either I revise the rent or vacate the Corporation. If any case laws in the matter may please be mentioned in y our response. Thanks to all the Learned Experts in anticipation.
With respectful regards.
Ankur Choudhary
14 March 2024 at 18:03
Can aunt give a house as a gift to his nephew ? If aunt give a house as a gift then nephew will have to pay tax or not ?
Member (Account Deleted)
14 March 2024 at 14:00
I left college in 2 nd year , it is a 3 year course . I ve paid full fees of 2 nd . But they are asking me to pay for 3 Rd to give back my original certificates.
But in the prospectus it's clearly mentioned that (custody of orginal certificates ) After the approval of the candidature, originals will be returned to the students.
Anonymous
14 March 2024 at 13:24
husband getting rents 3lakhs above, wife wants to prove it, to get maintenance
is it maintainable to file petitioner u/o 39 rule 7
Krishna Chandra Misra
14 March 2024 at 13:21
Myself Advocate kanpur member of Adhivakta kalyan nidhi number 14144 have sent all papers to Lucknow on 12 Jan 2024 but no payment till date.Phone calls not entertained by office.myU.P.Bar council enrolment no.is 92 of year 1976.Thanks
vamsi
14 March 2024 at 04:26
what are the steps to be taken under order 21 rule 48(3).
garnishee did not attache the salary of JDR and EP is made absolute. even the garnishee did not attach the salary of JDR. show cause notice sent even though the garnishee did not attach. court ordered steps to be taken under order 21 rule 48(3). what are the steps in those aspect. please suggest.
Anonymous
13 March 2024 at 19:05
Sir
Alienating christan minors property by father without leave of court is whether void or voidable. Because after becoming major 40 years gone. Possession is with me. The joint property was sold by my father when I was minor at 10 years.The property was gifted by my grand father in will deed as joint property with my Father. As per Guardian and wards act , guardian can sell without court permission. In which case it is voidable.but for christan, whether natural guardian can act as guardian without court permission.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Police caught us doing make out inside a car
Police caught us at night around 12 with my gf inside car when we were almost ready to make out as she was removing her pants but suddenly police came and started recording us and started threatening us they took me to their police car and ask me to go with them to police station or otherwise give money they were asking 20 thousand but after long conversation they took 10 thousand and also abuse my gf asking sensitive sexual things I have just given upsc interview and she is working what should we do as we both were frightened