Apurva Kumar
20 March 2009 at 12:06
Can ny 1 provides me the citation of Navjot Sngh Sidhu famous case in which he was aquited afterwards, nd allowed later to contest election thou he was convicted! or complete fact nd judgement of d case!
Regards
Apurva!
advocate satya
20 March 2009 at 11:43
hi
if there is a case of cheque bounce and the limitations of three years is been passed, if the accused shows the cheque amount as in his income tax return will the limitations extends? i heard a recent judgement on this is it true? further i want to ask can the information of any person as to his income tax return can be got from income tax dept. under RTI?
Anonymous
20 March 2009 at 01:32
A Partnership Firm of Raipur city,got registered in Yr.1975 in Bhopal,as it is situated in M.P state.It is having all the five partners from a single family.Firm mortgaged its property in PNB Bank ,in which it was existing for RS 2 lacs in YR 1975.
In Yr 1978 our 3 members entered in the Firm as new partners and their 3 partners , out of 5,,retired,so in Yr 1978 ,we were having 60% share in the Firm,as per Partnership Deed,signed by all the parners
.
In YR 1979,the said Firm was fully taken by our family and 2 new partners from our family entered in the Firm.The remaining old partners retired from the said Firm and against them ,as i said 2 members of our family entered in the Firm.We are not having proof now,ki the remaining 2 partners retired in Yr 1979,as we are not having in present the documents which contains the retiring party signature,stating that they retired from the Firm, in yr 1979.
Our problem is know,is that since our all the senior partners,which joined in 1979,were staying at Madras,so they got registered the Firm in Chennai ,as having its Head office there,without doing anything in Bhopal Registration office.In bhopal Reg.office only initial Partnership deed was given of YR.1975,when we were not partners.So according to Bhopal's Registration still starting parties are the partner of our Firm.
Our new partnership deed which was Registerd by us in Chennai,is silent of the property of the Firm.
We took out the property of Firm,where it is existing ,which was mortaged by the old partners somewhere in yr 1981 and got realesed Title Deed from PNB Bank.(please note,we are not having evidense now that we got realesed the T.Deed papers,but we have evidense ki old partners kept it for mortgage)
We are in possession of the property since then.We are having Industrail License for yr 1980 onwards in our 1 partner name,on behalf of the said Firm, also have Electricity and muncipality proof also in our name from Yr 1979.We are also having tenants in the property since from more than last 15 yrs.
Our problem is that ki old partners taking advantage of their name still in bhopal Registration office,started claming in Yr 2006,ki our firm is some other firm with the same name,as it is registerd in Chennai and they tied up with some mafia for its sale of its property.
We filed Civil suit agaist the old parties,but our case is strucked ki how to confirm that our firm and the old firm is same .
According to our Advocate,we have to prove it in Civil Court,as Judge is asking the same.
Is there is no time limitation for old partners who are challenging after approx 27 yrs?
We submitted all the Documents showing that we are in possession of the property from last 27 yrs , and still we are in possession.
What can we do,please suggest us.
can we file now,in bhopal registration office that we have been already registered in Chennai,so we dont need the Bhopal's registration or can we submit our new Partnership deed with Bhopal Registration office and get Registration here also?Can we do registration in two places or in two states?,
Please gove your valuable opinion and oblidge.
Thanking you sirs.
yours faithfully,
Sanjay chandak.
9300061575
jagadhathri
19 March 2009 at 22:39
whether a married daughter can get marriage expenses as maintenance after her marriage from father under hindu law
jagadhathri
19 March 2009 at 22:29
3 brothers made partition deed and registered it. later one among them cancelled the said deed. whether he can cancell it without the interference of the court?
PARVEEN DEEPAK ARYA
19 March 2009 at 21:26
in case the sons and daughter of a hindu settle abroad and merry after conversion are they entiled to inherit the property of their father . Kindly quote the judgment , if any , in case the reply is negative
aman
19 March 2009 at 21:13
I have donated a plot of 15 marlas in1999.the transfer deed was executed on name of charitable trust and vocational center.nothing was constructed on the plot by the said trust, now the trust has exchanged the plot with another plot by registered transfer deed. iwant to know that donated land can be transfered or exchanged,without the consent of donor? whether donor has some right over donated property?
Binod Kumar Mishra
19 March 2009 at 19:18
Dear Friends,
please suggest, my wife have in a counter retilliation filled a 498(A) case against me. we are not aware of that things and the Court has issued NBWs against me and three members of my family. all the family members have got AB from High Court. after that i have filled for the same in High Court, after lower court rejects the same. the court on first hearing after perusal of all documents and enclosures given 18.03.2009 as the date for reconcilliation. yesterday in the Chamber of HOn'ble judge we both sit there alongwith our respective lawyers. the court only asked that please come with a settlement or agreement between both of you. whether you want to live together then also or if you don't want to live together in that case too, a agreement on both of you are required by me. in the process of discussion, the court also observed and stated that i know that there is no demand of dowry from the boy side (i have first filled divorce petition). the court further given 02.04.2009 as the next date in his chamber at High Court.
kinldy suggest me, there is no possibility of reconcilliation between both of us (from my part). they have told the court yesterday that i (the girl) am ready to live with my husband only in any part of India. the court also observed all the discussions. the court also extended the NO COERCIVE second time till 02.04.2009, the next date of reconcilliation.
what i will have to do. i am neither going to talk her nor i will agree to her demands to live seperately. i also know that they will not talk to us first. anyhow we have to given any statement on 02.04.2009. what i will do, please learned friends, suggest me, it is very urgent. please reply with some details.
will court grant me AB on next date, as from the last two dates the court are issuing NO COERCIVE. please suggest, its urgent.
Pankaj Kumar Singh
19 March 2009 at 17:22
Hi,
What recourse lies for the complainant after discharge of accused by Magistrate in a case of cheating & forgery.
Regards,
Pankaj.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
applicable of esic to the trasport provider
sir please tell us about the applicable of esic to the transport provider for any company on the following points
1.If a company as hired a tranport provider and the transporter is covered under the esic can he subcontract the service
2.If the transport porvider is subcontracted the service to many other single owner(to say that he has heired vehicles for the sigle owners and attached the same).
3.If the subcontracted single owner vehicle is paid more than the ceiling limited payment (10000)will he be brought under the preview of esic
4.The subcontractor is giving the exclusive service to one single company