LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

AMIT TANEJA   14 April 2009 at 22:00

CASE LAWS

FROM WHERE I ACN GET THE LEADING JUGEMENTS FOR DEFAMATION S 499 , 500

AMIT TANEJA   14 April 2009 at 21:52

defamation

There is one lady"x" who goes to some hotel which attacked by dacoits and because of which she has to take the hostage there.for 7 days that lady was there in the hotel now one them shot the policeman after which police opperation starts and the dacaits were all arrested .that dacoits in the prison narrated the whole story to sone ltv and saidthat lady"x" was fallen in love with him
aggried by public disclosure she files a suit against the ltv claiming compensation


Iam astudent studing law
tell me beside s 499 what else said be alleged

AND IF IAM ON THE DEFANDANT SIDE HOW SHD I REPRESENT BY SIDE

BESIDE FRM WHICH INTERNET SIDE CAN I GET THE CASE LAWS AND THER FACTS TO SUPPORT BY CASE I HAVE MOOT COURT ON 20
PLZ HELP

PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU   14 April 2009 at 21:49

regarding the contract

HELLO ALL RESPECTED LEARNED EXPERTS,
MY CLIENT PURCHASED FLAT AND FILED APPLICATION FORM WITH THE PAYMENT OF 51,000/- AS ADVANCE TERMS AND CONDITIONS WAS STATED IN THE APPLICATION FORMS IT WAS THE CONDITION THAT AFTER THE PAYMENT OF THE TIME OF FILLING THE APPLICATION FORM APPLICATNT HAVE TO PAY THE REST AMOUNT OR 75% AMOUNT TO THE SELLER BY ANY WAY AND FOR THE FULFILLING THE SAID CONDITIONS SELLER HAVE TO EXECUTE SALE AGREEMENT IN FAVOUR OF THE PURCHASER WITH IN THE STIPULATED TIME I.E.45 DAYS FROM THE FILLING THE APPLICATION FORM WITH THE CONNECTION OF THE SAID TERMS AND CONDITION MY CLIENT APPLIED FOR THE LOAN TERM RUPEES 17,00,000/- BUT SELLER DO NOT EXECUTE THE SALE AGREEMENT EVENTHOUGH PASSED A ONE YEAR MEAN WHILE A THREE INSTALLMENT PAID BY MY CLIENT BUT NOT EXECUTED THE SALE AGREEMENT THE BANK CANCEL THE LOAN OF MY CLIENT SO WE ISSED LEGAL NOTICE AND NOT REPLED BY THE SELLER WE LODGED COMPLAIN REGARDING THE CANCELL OF THE CONTRACT AND REFUND OF THE AMOUNT WITH THE INTEREST NOW I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW THAT FOR THE TERMINATION OF THE CONTRACT OR FOR THE RECOVERY OF THE MONEY I HAVE TO LODGE MONE SUIT IN THE CIVIL COUR WHETER FOR IT ANY NOTICE MANDATORY. IF ANY WRIT IS APPLICABLE THEN SUGGEST ME THANK U

PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU   14 April 2009 at 21:37

precharge

hello all experts respected,
what is the meaning of the pre charge and on the which stage it can be taken
please also inform me the stages of the criminal appeal matter.
i dont know the stages of the high court on the which time special ,mis criminal applicatiions lies please inform me
regards

Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate   14 April 2009 at 20:19

value of unregisterd will

hi
a person is very ill,he is unable to walk and also now he is kept under medical trietment,and he want to make his will but he is unable to go to the ragistrar office and he can make his will on a plane paper. is plain paper will has value?

vijay dhiman   14 April 2009 at 19:43

EMPLOYEE PROVIDENT FUND

1.WHT IS THE LIMIT OF EPF DEDUCTION BY NUMBER OF EMPLOYEE AND BY AMOUNT.

2. WHT WE Should be deducted amount paid to a contractor (sweeper , labour or any other labour which was working in a contractor)

Bipin   14 April 2009 at 17:37

Common Terrace occuipied by member

Our society has ground + 3 floor and 2 wings. each wing has 14 flats. upto 2nd floor each floor has 4 flat and on 3rd floor there is only 2 flat and remaining area as commom terrace. but 2 members from each wing has occuipied (covered) the same common area. another problem is that entrance of the terrace above 3rd floor is also from member's house. So when any other member has to go to terrace then he has to go from member's house (because they occuipied 3rd floor common passage in which staircase for main terrace is located. Recently society has repaired entire terrace and other member want entrance for the main terrace free (ie above 3rd floor). what can we do to resolve this problem.

Amaresh Pradhan   14 April 2009 at 17:33

Suppliers/Vendor Agreement -Hotel

Dear All,

If anyone have a draft supplier/vender agreement relatiing to hotel i.g. vegetable suplly agreement etc .....please send me a format.

hage nibo   14 April 2009 at 17:19

A Rare Case regarding Central Service Rules

ONE OF THE RAREST CASE OF A CLIENT
Treat this Serious & an Urgent Case please!!!

( 1 )

Mr. “A”, a civil govt. servant (clerk) was placed under suspension on 16/04/2002, pending disciplinary proceeding against him under the charges of unauthorized absence from the duties.

The inquiry was ordered and held into the charges of unauthorized absence under the provision of Rule 14 of CCS (CCA), 1965 as per the procedures employed to impose major Penalty.

The said suspension Order was revoked on 27/10/2004 & Mr. “A” joined his duty.

The proceeding ultimately ended only with minor penalty of withholding one periodical increment without any cumulative effect, as defined in Sub-rule (iv) of Rule 11 of the CCS (CCA) rules, 1965 read with FR-24.

The said order of revocation is incomplete and impugned in terms of Civil Service Fundamental Rule 54(B) (1).

Because, Fundamental Rule 54(B) (1) requires that when an employee is reinstated, his (a) pay & allowances to be paid for the suspension period and (b) Whether the said period of suspension should be treated as on duty, should clearly be mentioned in the revocation Order.

But, the Order is silent on as to pay and allowances to be paid to “A” after reinstatement as required by FR 54(B)(1)(a). Whereas, it treated the suspension period, w.e.f 16-04-2002 to 26-10-2004 not in duty for any purpose.


Mr. “A” was imposed only minor penalty as defined in Sub-rule (iv) of Rule 11 of the CCS (CCA) rules 1965 read with FR-24 i.e withholding one periodical increment without any cumulative effect.
Order/Administrative instruction of the Govt. of India runs as:
“Suspension should be held wholly unjustified when the proceedings end with minor penalty. - The Staff Side of the Committee of the National Council set up to review the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965, had suggested that in cases where a Government servant, against whom an inquiry has been held for the imposition of a major penalty, is finally awarded only a minor penalty, the suspension should considered unjustified & full Pay & Allowances paid for suspension period. Government have accepted this suggestion of the Staff Side. Accordingly, where departmental proceedings against a suspended employee for the imposition of a major penalty finally end with the imposition of minor penalty, the suspension can be said to be wholly unjustified in terms of FR 54-B and the employee concerned should, therefore, be paid full pay and allowances for the period of suspension by passing a suitable order under FR 54-B.
Thereafter Mr. “A” wrote an appeal/representation to reconsider the said Order to the same authority, but a threatening letter was replied on 20/7/2005 that the case may be reopened and reviewed from the beginning {with the case of forging medical certificates that Mr. “A” used in this case to regularize his absent period} if Mr. “A” keeps on arguing it.

And ( 2 )


. Mr. “A” again remained absent unauthorizedly from 01-09-2005 to 31-08-2006 (one full year) from his service without informing his controlling officer, as the officer was not in the station at that time.

Mr. ”A” again rejoined his duties on 01-09-2006, after remaining absent from 01-09-2005 to 31-08-2006.

. Mr. “A” applied for the Extra Ordinary Leave on medical ground for the absence period from 01-09-2005 to 31-08-2006, for regularization of his absent period.


But Mr.

BHAWNA   14 April 2009 at 17:17

sHIFT of Regd Office

Sir,

There is a Company incorporated on 24th April,2008 and want to shift its registered office from one state to another.

And the Company has no final accounts & Balance Sheet as on date filled and therefore what shall be the status?

can a Company do so as the Form No. 23 AC is not filled.

Regards