Mehta
25 February 2018 at 10:41
Deed of confirmation along with conveyance deed lodged with sub-registrar for registration in May 1995 is showing pending. Secondly the consideration amount is not paid by purchaser hence the physical possession is not given by the seller, under this circumstances, can seller withdraw the documents filed for registration.
Member (Account Deleted)
24 February 2018 at 17:36
respected sir with all due respect to you and all advocates i am myself advocate in these batch cases filed u/s 138 of ni act. sir by inadvertence oversight and lack of computer knowledge i myself filed process in the court, as per Form no. 4 (second schedule) of crpc, as 111 special magistrate court instead of lll special magistrate court. also the section without checking the discrepancy ( i.e;111 special magistrate court ) issued me process u/s 82(1) crpc for paper publication. the paper publication is made in vernacular newspaper as per court's order and filed in court. now as the court knows the discrepancy ( i.e;111 special magistrate court instead of lll special magistrate court ) it has posted the matter for orders and, objections if any. the accused did not appear on the day of filing paper publication in court. also the accused knows the correct court no., jumped bail from the same court no., and is aware of cc no's.
now 1. whether typing 111 special magistrate court instead of lll special magistrate court make the paper publication defective?
2. while giving paper publication u/s 82(1) of crpc in vernacular newspasper through court's order , i have only filed (copied) process as per Form no. 4 (second schedule ) and not typed "as per courts order" and "sd/-" above magistrate.?
3. whether AIR 1963 SC 1120, AIR 1964 SC 1300, AIR 1969 PAT 181, AIR 1976 KARNATAKA 204 BE OF ANY HELP? WANT TO AVOID FRESH PAPER PUBLICATION?
PLEASE ADVISE AS THE MATTER IS POSTED ON 28-02-2018 FOR ORDERS.URGENT.
vinod kumar singh
24 February 2018 at 11:31
where to register apartment association
Puran Chand
24 February 2018 at 10:06
Respected Sir/Madam,
With due respect to all,
At your good faith, I need valuable information/suggestion regarding the Degree, Which was obtained through distance mode.
Commenced date: November-2011 and completed on November-2014, degree awarded as on 27th May,2015 from Sikkim Manipal University-DE outside the Jurisdiction of University. (this line in important on the basis of this line you will find result of validity read with Judgement Para No.10)
Below, is the link of 13 pages Sikkim High Court Judgement on SMU students and 2 pages Judgement of Supreme Court.
https://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/5999843_SikkimHighCourtJudgement_on_student_vs_SMU.pdf
https://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/2774079_SupremeCourtProceedings_sikkimManipalUniversity.pdf
Here one more valuable suggestion also required as:
Is this degree is fall under the purview of Govt. Order No. 252-HE of 2012 Dated: 30.05.2012 after Sikkim High Court Validated all the degrees of SMU Students, link to see this order given below:-
http://jkhighereducation.nic.in/pdf/GOVT-ORDERS/252HE2012.pdf
I am very thankful to all of You.
Thanking You
Yours faithfully
Ramesh
23 February 2018 at 22:04
Dear Respected Experts,
I am into a situation and need your kind advice.
I bought a property a month ago from seller (Say 'A') through loan from a reputed Bank. Flow of the property as per EC, all registered in Registrar office.
1981 - Person 'X' (Father of 'A') purchased the property from someone
1990 - Person 'X' did gift deed the property to his wife Person 'Y'. Person 'Y' also has the Patta in her name.
2005 - Person 'Y' has passed away leaving his husband(Person 'X') and 2 children(Person 'A' and Person 'B') as legal heirs. [Death Certificate and Legal Heir certificate is present]
2008 - Person 'X' also passed away leaving his 2 children(Person 'A' and Person 'B') as legal heirs. ( New legal heir certificate is available)
2010 - Person 'B' gave away her 50% of the share to Person 'A', thus making Person 'A' as sole owner of the property (Registered in registrar office). Person B's husband has also signed as witness for this sale deed.
the property was in posession of Person A for the last 8 years and he has been in living in that house with his family. He has paid property tax and also has Patta and Chitta changed to his name.
In between , he also pledged the house in the finance company and restored it back.
2018 - Person A sold the property to me through bank loan and has vacated the house.
------------------------------------------
Now the problem is, Person 'B' (Sister of Person 'A') claiming that she did not handover the property in a conscious mind. It was done when she was not in good health.
Also saying that HER MOTHER 'PERSON Y'IS NOT DEAD YET and SHE IS ALIVE.and then they have one more brother.
but none of them have come to us yet.
------------------------------------------
Could you please guide me what should i do next? I am so much disappointed, even after getting everything verified with the bank.
Thanks
Anonymous
23 February 2018 at 21:05
Dear Experts,
Me and my brother jointly own a flat in mumbai. As he didn't had enough money to buy his 50% share he applied for a home loan with SBI, Our shares are not defined in sale agreement done between us and the builder, but I am the First owner in the sale agreement. I paid my share by selling my under construction house. Even though he has sufficient income to pay the Emi's, Bank asked for co-applicant as per their rule. So I became the co-applicant in the home loan. Since then the EMi's are paid by him only.
Now due to some family disputes I don't wish to stay with him. I offered him his 50% share with the equivalent appreciation on it, but he refuses to leave. The offer he is giving is too low as per market rate of today. I also offered to sell it to third party and share the consideration in return, that too he refused. He said he wont leave the house nor will sell. I am stuck in between as I am not getting my money or property and also have home loan liability on my head. My income is that much, I can't even go new home loan because of the present loan going on.
In the above situation what legal action I can take to come out of it. Is there anyway to come out the home loan burden at least. I can transfer my share to my wife, if required. Kindly help.
Thanks in advance
DATT K
23 February 2018 at 09:17
On the stamp paper names of first party and second party are to be mentioned. Please advise in case there are 4 joint owners purchasing a property, whether names of all joint owners are required to appear on the stamp paper against the column SECOND PARTY or only name of the first joint owner will appear and there will be no problem. that is WHETHER it is mandatory to show names of all 4 joint owners on the Stamp paper to make it a valid sale deed.
RAJESH CHOPRA
22 February 2018 at 21:55
I had booked an office space for my own use in a commercial project in NOIDA in Nov 2012 thinking that I would do some consultancy post my retirement. I have paid 60% of the cost but construction has not reached even first floor.
I have now filed a complaint in RERA. I would like to know if filing a complaint in RERA is beneficial as compared to consumer forum or NCDRC.
Which forum is fast in resolution.
Thanks
Anonymous
22 February 2018 at 20:37
I have a 1.50 acre Land in AP. I got it from My Father (S.Narayana) as legacy. It is an ancestral property. I have pattadhar passbook.
Its Survey number is 335-10.
Due to childrens education, i shifted to City 5 years back. I left the Land vacant.
By taking this advantage My neighbour Farmer took the possession illegally.
They are Not allowing me to Enter Land With Thier local political Power.
I went to Advocate and filed permanent injuction suit and Court sanctioned temporary injuction order. During Court proceedings opposite Party submitted Sale deed claiming this Land.
Facts of Sale deed:
Year:1974
S. No: 335/2
Claimant: D. Devudu
Executant: S. Ramarao
Out of 9 acres in Survey number 335/2,
1.24 acre Sold by S. Ramarao to D. Devudu.
Facts of Survey number :
As per available revenue records,
1958 revenue record Shows as 335 Survey number is sub divided into 335/1 and 335/2.
335/2 is of 9 acres and owned by 6 members namely,
1.S. Rambabu
2.S. Atchanna
3.S. Venkanna
4.S. Apparao
5.S. Lakshmanrao
6.S. Suryarao
Relationship between 1st person S. Rambabu and 3rd person S.venkanna is Elder son and Father.
S. Venkanna has two sons.
S.Venkanna's younger son is S. Venuswami.
S.Venuswami Has one son, His Name is S. Narayana.
S. Rambabu has one son, His name is S.Ramarao (executant in Sale deed).
Remaining 4 are others.
In that Record each one share is Not mentioned.
But off the Record 6 People Partitioned Land. Partition done orally. No written Document is Not available.
In 1967, 335/2 is re-surveyed and sub divide as 335/5 to 335/12. In 1967 revenue Record , 335/10 is of 1.50 acre is in the name of S.Narayana(son of S. Venuswami). Whereas S.Ramarao Name is Not mentioned in 1967 Record.
Sale deed executed by S.Ramarao in 1974.
In that Sale deed new Survey number for 1.24 extent is Not mentioned. Old Survey number 335/2 is mentioned.
I have submitted These Details to My Advocate. He said there is no Problem With that Sale deed. It is thier Problem to prove Sale deed is related to our Land.
It is very clear That Prior to Sale deed(1974), We have revenue record 1967 clearly showing 335/10 is in the Name of S.Narayana. Where as sale deed is executed by S.Ramarao who is Not the Owner of Survey no:335/10.
They might purchased other Land in 335/2 out of 9 acres. They are claiming your Land by showing other Land Sale deed. No Need to worry, WE will get permanent injuction.
I Need experts view on this case. Please Express Ur opininon.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Reply to interregatories by op
Hi,
I am the complainant for a case filed in consumer count. Case is related to builder(OP) delayed delivery by 3.5 years and misused Force Majure clause to give nominal compensation - my petition is for fair compensation.The OP filed the questioner and I am asked to reply notarised. My question is while replying do i need to put the question line (the actual question) and below that the answer ? Any other thing other than verification/affidavit need to include there in reply?
Thanks,
B Dutta