tarun
13 May 2011 at 16:19
respected members,
on my complaint a case us 148/149/323/452/506 was registered against accused persons, but on the same day accused persons inflicted some injuries on their body with friendly hands and got showed a fracture on the left hand index finder, got medically examined and a false cross case registered against us u/s 148/149/323/325/506, after about one month of the incidence (DDR was recorded on the complaint of accused persons on the next day of incident but false cross case was registered after about one month), POLICE AND ADDITIONAL S.P IS HELPING THE ACCUSED PERSONS, i on the next day of incident write, s.p of city and C.M.O of civil hospital that injuries are self inflicted, and once again after 15 days demanded for medical board examinations of accused persons, and after 5 months again demanded medical board and forensic expert medical examination of accused persons that injuries are self inflicted, but no action has been taken by S.P, CMO, DGP, IG etc on my application for appointment of medical board and forensic expert. now challan is yet to be presented against both of us parties in the court of JMIC, can i give an application before JMIC, before filing of challan by police for appointment of medical board ???? Can JMIC, give Directions to police before filing Challan for appointment of Medical board ??? is JMIC is competent to order for appointment of medical board for the examinations of accused persons to know that injuries are self inflicted with friendly hands or not ?????? plz guide, challan of police is yet to be presented
B Guru Murthy
13 May 2011 at 13:42
Dear Ld. Members
the below quoted rule is of
DP Rules - Tamil Nadu .
"as per rule 5(X) of the Dowry Prohibition Rules, the Dowry Prohibition officer should ascertain the genuiness of the complaint"
Any such rule for DP Rules in AP
pleases can anyone let me know in this regard as there is now dowry taken in my case.
Anonymous
13 May 2011 at 13:31
This query arose after reading the following thread http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Value-of-anonymity-in-true-democracy-36790.asp
It talks about 1995 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission.
My question is do we have similar rulings from our Supreme Court protecting anonymous free speech and expression?
Anonymous
13 May 2011 at 12:49
Sir,
In a Disciplinary proceedings recommenced after the High Court had quashed the charge sheet and the Order of suspension on the grounds of mala fides and had given the liberty to the Department to objectively examine the allegations of misconduct the principal Witness in the Quashed by Court, a Deputy Director issued and signed the charge sheet for his reinstated Director.
Will the said charge sheet be considered as Legal?
The Witnesses , a complainant in the quashed by Court charge sheet - listed as the first witness in the charge sheet as aforesaid submitted a pre dated Affidavit instead of recording his statement and the same was accepted by the Inquiry Officer in an ex parte Inquiry without first supplying to the Charged Director.
Will it be legally valid?
The Inquiry Officer made all his findings relying only on these Affidavits in the ex parte Inquiry and held the Charges as proved. Will it be legally valid?
Ram Sowrya
13 May 2011 at 11:52
Dear all,
Can any one provide order/Circular/Memo
"Information about 498a-compoundable"
in AP which was released DC Correspodnet passed by POLICE OFFICER UMPATHI
on last year April 2010.
If any one have a copy can also upload it.
Please anyone help in this regard
raam
N.J. MISHRA
13 May 2011 at 11:46
please member kinldy suggest:-
whether the workers who are working as part timers are covered under PAYMENT OF MINIMUM WAGES ACT, MATERNITY BENEFIT ACT, 1961, THE EQUAL REMUNERATION ACT, 1976 and whether such workmen come under the definition of workmen (unskilled workmen).
the educational institution registered under "Mumbai Trust Act" can be considered as Commercial Establisment, if no, then all employment related Acts like PAYMENT OF MINIMUM WAGES ACT, THE EQUAL REMUNERATION ACT, 1976.
valentine thakkar
12 May 2011 at 20:34
Could anyone give me the citation in the famous case MACP of Sarla by the SC. In this judgement, detailed discussion is given on the Rule of Thumb in respect of person's income.
Thanks
Anonymous
12 May 2011 at 18:22
My Grandfather had one son and two daughters. I am the daughter of one of the daughters.
My Grandfather had old property in Bombay. My uncle has died in 1989 and my uncle also died in 2003.
Now, my uncle's only son(my cousin)'s advocate says that this being an inherited property daughters born in 1947 (my mother) have no rights because my grandfather did not make any will.
I want to know the legal position and % share if my mother is eligible for.
What is the method of distribution?
Anonymous
12 May 2011 at 15:17
i m working in MP govt electricity distribution company ,if i will be terminated from service, will i be blacklisted to apply from other mp or out of state govt services. Experience certificate will be given or not.
Actually i m doing job but i m not satisfied with this. now i m working due to bond. my bond duration is 5 years from first appointment after one year training. if i leave this prior to bond i will have to pay the bond, if not they will terminate me but i want to go without termination and without bond. what will i do...?. i had joined this 2007. after one year training appointed as regular AE. what should i do to leave this.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
medical board examination in a false cross case
respected members,
on my complaint a case us 148/149/323/452/506 was registered against accused persons, but on the same day accused persons inflicted some injuries on their body with friendly hands and got showed a fracture on the left hand index finder, got medically examined and a false cross case registered against us u/s 148/149/323/325/506, after about one month of the incidence (DDR was recorded on the complaint of accused persons on the next day of incident but false cross case was registered after about one month), POLICE AND ADDITIONAL S.P IS HELPING THE ACCUSED PERSONS, i on the next day of incident write, s.p of city and C.M.O of civil hospital that injuries are self inflicted, and once again after 15 days demanded for medical board examinations of accused persons, and after 5 months again demanded medical board and forensic expert medical examination of accused persons that injuries are self inflicted, but no action has been taken by S.P, CMO, DGP, IG etc on my application for appointment of medical board and forensic expert. now challan is yet to be presented against both of us parties in the court of JMIC, can i give an application before JMIC, before filing of challan by police for appointment of medical board ???? Can JMIC, give Directions to police before filing Challan for appointment of Medical board ??? is JMIC is competent to order for appointment of medical board for the examinations of accused persons to know that injuries are self inflicted with friendly hands or not ?????? plz guide, challan of police is yet to be presented