URCs are Private Ventures.CSD is a solely owned govt enterprise but govt of India though bleeds to provide this extraordinary facilities to the private ventures a meagre 50 % only passed onto CFI. Look at the post below:-
:Turnover of Defence Canteens
Turnover, Profit and Profit distributed to beneficiaries after depositing 50% in Consolidated Fund of India (CFI) of Canteen Stores Department (CSD) during the last three years, year-wise, is as under:-
(Rupees in Crore)
Profit distributed to beneficiaries
2007-08 84.44
2008-09 6955.11, 203.69 101.84
2009-10 8689.80, 226.53,113.26
2010-11 9534.29
Annual accounts for this period are under finalization.
"As per laid down policy, 50% of the total profits earned by CSD is being deposited into Consolidated Fund of India (CFI). The remaining 50% is distributed to various beneficiaries as determined by the Competent Authority. As per policy in vogue, after deduction of regular and adhoc allocations of 4.91 % of this amount, the balance is allocated to Army, Air Force and Navy in the ratio of 85:10:5.
This information was given by Defence Minister Shri AK Antony in written reply to Shri Ram Krjpal Yadav and Shri Shadi Lal Batra in Rajya Sabha today."
Would somebody except those who thinks they are for the poor and needy people only please help me to get a copy of the " As per laid down policy 50 % of the total profits-----" as quoted by the Def Min of India. I have tried through RTI route but denied invoking JAG Army letter which has inferred that URCs are private ventures , not instrumentality of States and hence not covered by RTI Act 2005. That huge sums of money ( ours and yours money) for the past fifty years is going into pockets of some private individuals who are not accountable to either OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE/CAG , Defence Audit . It is a serious matter. And I need help.
Anonymous
09 December 2011 at 10:22
Respected Sir,
My family resides in a 2 storey house.Both floors are internally connected through stairs.Above floor is in the name of my father and below is in the name of my mother.Recently we filed a domestic violence case against my father(who does not live with us).Now we fear that he will sell the above floor to someone else who might force us out of the home.
We are in a dilemma.Please give us a way to secure our house.
varma
07 December 2011 at 09:15
1)can rental agreement made b/w me & tenant for my non agriculture land that was registered one month before in sub register office can show in court for valuation of my property inorder to pay court fee i.e 10 times annual rental i.e Rs1,20,000 in which court fee is Rs. 3600 for filing suit for declaration of Title on my non agriculture land property against defendant i.e cousin(Not Tenant) who is denying my Title & ownership
2)Whether this registered rental agreement comes under rental of non agriculture land(residential land) recorded in government body can be used as proof for valuation of my said property
3)If not I have to pay court fee as per market value.i.e property cast is 32 lakhs & court fee is accordingly Rs34,000
NOTE:In order to show rental,then condition in AP court fee & suit valuation act is the rental value of building should be recorded in ant government body if not it should be according to market value fot Title declaration suit
Anonymous
05 December 2011 at 14:50
SIR,
I AM STAYING IN PAGDI SYSTEM IN KANDIVLI MUMBAI, WE WANT TO FORM A TENANT ASSOCIATION,
SO WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE AND WHERE IT CAN BE
REGISTERED ? PLEASE GUIDE.
Anonymous
02 December 2011 at 21:49
Dear Experts,
If there are 02 registered union in Company ( Manufacturing Company ) having nearly equal membership then with which union the Management will discuss & negotiate the Wage Settlement..?
Thanks in advance.
Dear Sir,
I have lend money of Rs.1 Lakh on promissory note my Qstion is.
1)what the stamp to be affixed in Maharashtra State ?
2)whether the amount of Rs.1 Lakh can be lent in cash on the basis of promissory note?
3)Are Witnesses are required in P.Note?
4)How much money can be lent on the promissory note?
I have taken Cheque of Rs.1 Lakh as additional security now he is defaulter can the above documents would be sufficient.there is also above entry in my books of account.
An overseas company wants to finance the procurement of raw material listed on the NCDEX ( National Commodities Exchnage) for processing and exports through their Indian Associates. But they want to have Clear Title to the raw material till it is processed. Is it allowed under Indian Law and what are the modalities?
Sumit
01 December 2011 at 11:18
Dear Friends,
Is it possible for an appellant to pray for a rejoinder in an appeal court while the appellant's appeal petition is pending?.
In our case we won. The other side has went for appeal against dismissal of suit. Now, suddenly the appellant has made a petition praying for rejoinder of a necessary party. Can a rejoinder be allowed at appeal stage?
Sumit
jeetendra patel
01 December 2011 at 11:09
Dear Colleagues,earlier advocate on record filed the Misc Civil Appeal challenging the order of status quo in which there is delay of 400 days.The delay is because of negligence of earlier advocate but in appeal memo he has mentioned that he could not get knowledge of status quo order and got the same at late stage.Appeal memo and delay application is already filed. At this juncture i have filed my v.p. by taking noc from earlier advocate.NOW I have following querry.PL. ENLIGHEN ME ON.
1)Whether i have to stick up with stand taken by earlier advocte?
2)Change in stand will practically amount to replacing earlier application, which court may/may not allow.
3) Any citation in the present facts?
4)Any citation for condoning delay of 400 days in filing Misc. Civil Appeal?
Property law
My client inherited a piece of land with building constructed thereon alongwith his two brothers. The share in the building was specifically demarcated. One brother gifted his share in the building to my client & the other one sold his share. Now my client wants to demolish the old building and construct a new one. The gift deed to my client mentioned the portion of the building gifted but the deed erronously omitted gifting of proportionate share of land oON WHICH THE BUILDING STANDS, i.e. land beneath the building. There are judgements which says that such omission does not confer any residuary rights in favour of the seller/donor in respect of land underneath the building. However, I am unable to find such judgements. Matter is urgent. Please give me some judgements/citations