Deepak Kapoor
25 October 2017 at 11:19
Dear Experts
Myself Deepak Kapoor resident of west patel nager, New Delhi . I am currently reside on first floor a 200 sq yd plot builder floor.
I purchased this floor in 2010 and my purchase agreement states that i have one parking in the plot.
Now the owner on ground floor has sold to another person who is creating problems for me to park my car.
The logic given by the new ground floor owner is that he has the right to park the car in front of his house inside the 200 sq yd plot.
I also showed him my purchase agreement where it is mentioned that the first floor owner shall get one parking inside the compound.
But the ground floor owner has got his lawyer into this and the ground floor owner has stated that since there is no specific amount spent or mentioned in the my purchase agreement the parking is at the discretion of the ground floor owner who has all rights to park his cars in front of his house in the compound.
When i explained him that it is common area the lawyer mentioned that it is common only for people to walk and enter not park their cars
Plz guide me if there is any guidelines in Indian law that can be of help to me.
Thanks
Deepak
Anonymous
23 October 2017 at 17:26
Dear Sir,
My teacher wrote some b.c caste name in my T.C without my intervention while i was joining at 6th class( 30 years back) and that caste is continued thru my education. Actually i didn't belongs to that caste, now i am doing some private job, but i didn't get any benefits by using that b.c caste. At present i realized that i would like to mention my original caste name in my child T.C(my child is going to join 6th class. Is it possible now. I believe so many persons facing the same issue. Pleas advice. thanks in advance.
Darius Engineer
22 October 2017 at 23:19
I've filed a RCS as a POA holder of my aunt who's old and physically fragile against a fraudster claiming that he has purchased her property in Vasai vide a forged Agreement for Sale. Can the court ask me to deposit with the court the original documents that I'm in possession of to prove my bonafides when I've already filed copies of the same as exhibits to the RCS. I requested the court to have the originals examined by a court personnel and return the same as I have serious apprehension that these documents can go missing from the court considering the devious conduct of the respondent during thee last few years. I am willing to produce the same during the trial and cross examination as and when required. The opposite advocate has objected to this and the judge is inclined towards his view point.
Darius Engineer
puspendra bhadoriya
22 October 2017 at 00:26
If a person have the criminal record likely theft and the case is undergoing during this period a person wants an noc just for a job will that possible if its what is the criteria
shahid
21 October 2017 at 15:52
what does it means : petitioner present examined as PW1 Ex. P 1 and 2 marked PW1 bound over
Niraj
20 October 2017 at 21:34
Respected Experts,
Please guide and educate me on whether I will get my basic pay protected or not if the conditions are as follows -
I am serving in a U. P. govt aided Intermediate College under the department of Secondary Edu. drawing a basic pay of 66000 approx.( 7th pay revised). I applied for the post of Assistant Professor advertised by the U. P. Higher Education Service Commission, Allahabad, the body responsible for the selection of Assistant Professor for U.P. govt aided Degree (UG/PG) colleges under the department of Higher Education of U. P. Govt, after taking permission and NOC from the authority/employer. After going through a written test and and interview conducted by the UPHESC, Allahabad I got selected for the Asst. Prof. post. The entry pay scale being P.B. 15600-39100, AGP 6000 (pre-revised) corresponding to Basic pay of 57700 (ugc 7th pay revised), I am at loss of the basic pay of salary.
Please let me know if pay-protection is admissible to me. Please quote the relevant information and rules for taking my future decision and betterment of my career.
Thanks and regards.
Sudhir Rao
20 October 2017 at 13:35
Respected sirs,
I here by take previlege to ask u suggestion regarding a case..I won a case in cat cout Kolkata in the year 2015 citing the judgement of Patna CAT court of similar matter which was later upheld by Delhi High Court ..Afterwards the aggreived party (staff selection commison) challenged the same decision in Supreme court and that appeal was also dismissed ..Meanwhile our judgement was again challenged by SSC during the pendency of orginal judgemtn in Supreme court but we backed out of the case due to inevitable reasons ..Now I got to know about the sc's Judgement that the order of Patna cat court is upheld...So ,i m in dilemma whether i would get justice or not as i backed out of the case when it was challenged by SSC...pls suggest what cource of action is availble to me to get back my job on the basis of that judgement..
crpc
18 October 2017 at 02:20
Hi All,
Thanks in advance to all LCI Learned Members!!
I want a suggestion for a issue-
Statement of facts
1. Girl married in 1976 by hiding previous marriage by man, stating no dowry required.
2. Husband after couple of year after having two children ( boy and girl ), they dropped wife in father house till 1978.
3. With the fake case of loose character , and daughter ran with girl father and brother they dropped at father house.
4. Girl child has been expired due to lack or resources in illness.
5. After having multiple fake cases from husband side.
6. Wife side responded and made safe by putting a maintenance case of crpc 125.
7. Initially court fixed RS 300 pm, but putting efforts and some bribe in between husband convert RS 300 into Rs 150.
8. The things were moving and husband given RS 150, till 2007.
9. In between as Rs 150 is not enough to survive, she caught temporary school teacher job ranging from Rs 500 - 10000 pm in the period of 1995 to 2015.
10. After crossing age 60, they payment reduced in the range of Rs 3000 to 4000.
11. In between husband at 2007 filed petition under section 127 of crpc to stop the maintenance of Rs 150.
12. Rs 150 has been fixed by high court during the judicial process / fight .
13. In response to section 127 of crpc to stop maintenance wife side file the application for getting the difference between 2007-2017.
14. In between due to complication of judicial process, like changing judges, bribe corruption and other husband doesnt provided even a single rupee, but he moved to high court for deciding his 127 case fastly for the family court and produced some rti answer which were saying the temporary job of wife for 3-4 thousand.
15. Family court had arguments from husband and take the statements in which multiple facts has been proven fake.
16. Family court send the case for mediation for ADJ 12 Judge.
17. ADJ Judge with mixing pressure of both advocates has blocked wife for not putting ans future claim.
18. The lady were old, ill, and alone therefore they took signature with the help of multiple pressure and make her helpless indirectly.
19. In this long duration of all cases wife father and brother were in support till 2015, after which they both expired.
20.Husband took advantage of all these factor to make his ill objectives converting into reality blocking wife for future for any right and claim.
21. Mediation process has been done just today i.e 17-10-2017.
At the other side -
22. In father home of wife, both father and a brother who were helping expired in 2015.
23. After same the remaining brother and there wife and widow wife of expired brother want to kick out from family property and assets.
24. Even in august a strong misbehave, abusing with hitting has been taking place, after locking wife belonging and asking her to bring a truck and vacant the expired son house handover to his widow wife after death of brother who were helping by widow son wife.
25. In between the remained brother, his wife and widow wife torture the affected daughter of family to make the vacant the house..
26. In the process till yet no divorce has happened.
Now my question is-
In whole process
1. Advocate we hired charged money and didn't make any serious efforts in case to fight. He always push the affected wife by stating it is just for Rs 150 make a compromise. So he saved his work and charged money,.
2. The family court judge save her reading of file and labor of judgment.
3. Opposite party ( cunning and fake husband ) kicks her wife without giving anything and making himself save from future claiming of affected and left wife making her rights zero.
4. At father side brother and both widow and other brother wife captured all father side assets.
5. Father expired without any vasiyat.
But the affected lady has been killed by everyone either judiciary or father side family and husband side family.
My question is , is their any remedy after ADJ12 things, to provide her at least livable and maintainable life resources at old age with illness and all tough life troubles of life ?? The cunning person fakly marriage wife,generated two childs, in between he asked lots of dowry demands in fulfilling which wife family were failed, after which when demands were not fulfilled, he left his wife by dropping at father house and initiating few fake cases.
Kindly do let me know, if any of remedy possible ?
I feel the her right in father assets and even the husband things must not be veined by just ADJ12, What you people suggest here as the best remedy to give affected , ill, old age lady to have at least livable resources with proper respect and happiness ??
Thanks--
Ravindra Tribhuvan
17 October 2017 at 19:51
Respected Members,
kindly give your opinion on following case:
In the there are four land owners (i.e. A,B, C, & D) and sale agreement, conveyance deed is to be register but out of four land owner one land owner is not came for registration i.e. "D" will sub-registrar will be able to register the above mentioned documents with remark of "pending signature of "D" .
Please Advice
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Land sale deed
My father had a agricultural land sale agreement with brother for 6 lakhs in 1994. Family issues had held him from filing a suit within the stipulated period. Now,after retirement, he asked his brother for registration but he declined.
He thus sent an advocate notice DT 5th October 2017 to brother asking for registration or else he would have to file a non performance suit with the court.
His brother has today 25.10.17 sent his reply saying that all alligations are false and the sale deed was a trick. We should not be stepping on this land or pick any contractual money or he will suit us.
How legitimate is this answer and do we loose our rights?
Do note that the sale deed was on a 100 rupee stamp with notary and witness signatures. My father himself is contractually handing the land to tillers annually and has all proofs on stamp and in black and white.