Banuvara Raja
03 September 2019 at 04:14
We are 6 decree holders in the same suit. We have filed execution petition against defaulters who are 20 persons.
On the crpc 200 application sworn in statement judge took oath of only one of us in the box. And took same persons sign but not all our signature.
Can you guess why judge did like that?
Anonymous
02 September 2019 at 23:21
Whether the complainant under NI case can drop one of the accused person from the case, stating the person has nothing to do with issuance cheque. Any decided case law please.
Anonymous
02 September 2019 at 23:09
What is the procedure, when the accused person does not deliberately appear in NI case/trail despite issuance of several bailable warrant against him. Interestingly, though he executes bailable warrant issued against him. Any decided case laws.
srinivas
02 September 2019 at 20:31
Sir,
I am from Telangana, I have made plots and sold some plots in my Agricultural land without conversion of NALA(Non agriculture land assessment).
But, after some days He cancelled his registered sale deed of that plots. Now I have removed all plots and only doing Agriculture in that land at present. Please kindly guide me I have not made any conversion to NALA and not paid any NALA tax and at present I am doing Agriculture in my land , as per LAW now is my land comes Under Agriculture Land or Non- Agriculture Land?
Anonymous
02 September 2019 at 17:07
Respected Sirs, Note : Complainant is a joint purchaser (second name in Agreement) and also holds a Share Certificate as the Second member of the CHS. Entrance fees and Share Application money for both owners/members have been paid long back when the property was purchased in 2008. Due Documentary evidence was also produced both before the MC and during the proceedings. In September,2014 MC wrote to the First Member ( complainant’s wife) that the complainant is not a member. 1. A complaint under section 23 of MCS Act was filed with DY. Registrar of co-op. societies in March, 2015. 2. The Dy. Registrar issued an order rejecting complaint in Oct. 2015. 3. A Revision Application was filed with Honb’le Divisional Joint Registrar in Nov. 2015. 4. After prolonged delay Hon’ble DJR passed an order in July, 2018, setting aside the order of the Dy. Registrar and remanded the matter back to the Dy. Registrar for fresh hearing. 5. Honb’le DJR held that:  Respondent Dy. Registrar had not considered documentary evidence produced by the Applicant.  Respondent Dy. Registrar has not considered facts and has not followed due process of law while deciding the case.  Impugned order suffers from the violation of Principle of Natural Justice.  Therefore, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Respondent Dy. Reg. for afresh consideration and decision on its own merits. 6. In Aug. 2018, Dy. Reg. was approached for conducting afresh hearings. There were 6 hearings on different dates and the matter was closed for order in Jan. 2019. 7. Despite persistent follow-up, NO Order has been passed so far. 8. Recently, when enquiry was made, it was orally informed that it is decided to conduct re-hearing and a date in Sept. was conveyed. 9. When asked about the reason for the re-hearing no direct or satisfactory reply is forthcoming. But it is understood and it is likely that process under section 91 instead of section 23 will be insisted. MY QUERY : a) Although the initial order passed by DY.Reg. in Oct. 2015, went against the complainant, the matter was obviously heard and disposed off under section 23 as the order itself bears an inscripttion to the effect that it is an Order under section 23 of MCS Act, 1960. b) Hon’ble DJR , while bringing out various infirmities in the order of Oct. 2015, has not questioned the applicability of section 23, but has set aside the said order on account of illegalities mentioned in para no. 5 above. In the aforesaid circumstance, and especially since the matter has been remanded back for the limited purpose of AFRESH HEARING, can the present Dy. Reg. send complainant to co-op. court at this late stage? This will not only force the complainant to start the whole process de-novo but will also be vexatious for him. How can this be avoided? Can estoppel or res-judicata be invoked saying that the earlier decisions of the two authorities to consider and hear the matter under section 23, being a judicial decision, is correct and it should be followed for the AFRESH HEARING as well. I await your guidance.
sandhya
02 September 2019 at 16:20
Sir, I am a 36yrs old working women married 10yrs back.Now having two my husband is using abused language nd threating to go away from home nd stay with parents or Orphanage.I really got frustrated for his relatives to nd fro to our home.For that he is behaving like this.At present my mother is also hospitalised with major surgery.Plz suggest me how to solve this issue.
Aleken
02 September 2019 at 13:42
My name is John D'souza. My fathers name is Savio D'souza. The name on my share certificate is John D'souza. While the name on the pan card and aadhar card is John Savio D'souza. I have been asked to submit an affidavit of mismatch in name. Do i have to give an affidavit for :
One And The Same Person
OR
Change in Name
Anonymous
02 September 2019 at 12:45
Sir
Maine 24-05-2015 ko UP VAT me as a regular dealer registration karaya jise fir 14-07-2015 ko composition dealer me convert kara diya. ab 15-16 ke assessment ki notice prapt huyi jis sandarbh me jb CTO se mila to unhone kaha ki apka 2 assessment order hoga aur as a regular dealor jo stock apke pass bacha hai usper apko tax with interest deposit krna padega jo ki approx 18-19000 hoga. Jbki as a regular dealer meri total purchase approx 2.50 lac and sale approx 60000= hi huyi thi so mere pass approx 10000 ki itc bachi huyi thi. jise composition dealer hone ke karan aage carry forward nhi kiya ja skta tha. So Please guide me ki main kya karu Its urgent.
Ashish Dave
02 September 2019 at 11:48
Hello, i have a one court matter running under IPC 408, 420, 468, 471, 114 and IT 65, 66, 72. i am the main accused and other two accused. Opponent party is my cousin brother and we had settle the matter outside of the court by our family. Opponent Party did not settled the matter with other two accused and they are denying to do a settlement. But my cousin brother is ready to settle with me from court. So How we can settle the case from court between us only. Can we have an option from high court to settle this matter between us only and with other two accused, matter can continue.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Deed of Assignment Registration at Sub Registrar Office
I have purchased flat in Pune in 2012. Agreement to sale was registered in Dec 2012 and possession was accepted in 2014. But since then builder has not provided us completion certificate. I have requested him to register Deed of Assignment just to confirm all transaction completed smoothly. Draft of the same was submitted to builder's lawer for review and now his builder is saying according to MOFA you can not register such document rather form a co.op. Soc..
Does formation of society and deed of assignment are linked?