ishwar
13 October 2013 at 10:40
Dear Sir,
In 2011 december Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission released a notification for Group - 1 services exam. I am an aspirant of group - 1 services of Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission(APPSC). In May - 2011, APPSC conducted preliminary exmination (objective in nature) for group-1 services exam in which a total of 16000 members filtered for Mains exam out of 1,80,000 of total aspirants appeared for the exam.
After preliminary filteration some candidates went to APAT saying that there are 13 wrong answers in the preliminary examination key published by Appsc. When it went to APPSC notice, it appointed an expert commitee to revise the key objections filed by those aspirants. After careful analysis Expert commitee advised appsc to correct 7 answers out of 13 mentioned by those aspirants. Appsc accepted the suggestions made by expert commitee and altered the Mains selection list(Preliminary cleared aspirants list) as per the new key.
With this revised new list AP Public service commission went ahead and conducted Mains (Descripttive) exam for those 16000(Approximately) and shortlisted 606 candidates for interview. In February and March 2013 APPSC conducted interviews for those 606 candidates and ready to release the final merit list for the 314 posts.
In the mean time the aspirants who were filed the petition earlier went to Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal ( APAT ) and asked it to direct APPSC to revise the remaining 6 bits (13 - 7 mentioned above) also and stop the process. But APAT refused to direct Appsc to stop the process. Instead APAT directed APPSC to continue the selection process but should not release final merit list until the final judgement.
After some hearings APAT ordered APPSC to appoint another expert commitee to look into the 6bits. After indepth anlysis The expert commitee advised Appsc to remove 2 bits to avoid ambiguity as they have more than one correct answers and no objections for 4bits.
But the aspirants went to High court saying that they cant believe the expert commitee report as it was appointed by APPSC itself. Then highcourt ordered UPSC to look into this matter and submit its report within one month.
As they questioned the genunity of Appsc and its expert commitee and delaying the selection process, Appsc filed Special Leave Petition in Supreme Court to vacate the stay order given by AP High Court.
After careful analysis The Honerable Supreme court Bench comprised of Honerable Justices Mr. Chalameswar Sir and Mr. Gokale Sir announced the judgement by ordering APPSC to delete all the six bits which are ambigious and reprepare the mains selection list and reconduct the entire mains exam once again to all 16000aspirants.
But the fact is, even after repreparing the list after deleting the 6 bits also....99% of the candidates who wrote earlier will be also in the new list and have to write Mains exam (Total of 6 discripttive papers) once again.
[As I am one of the 606 candidates who sucussfully cleared Preliminary - Mains - Interview stages.....i know how hard it is to prepare for these stages. If remains conducted all of us loose almost 2 years of time which was dedicated for this preparation and confidence also. In the entire process we did not have neither a role nor did a mistake. Why because the entire selection process is under the control of APPSC. But still we were the loosers and has to write the exam once again and nothing will happen to those professor who prepared the wrong key and Appsc officials who conducted the exams based on such a key]
As per some legal experts APPSC did some blunders and missed some key points in filing its counter.
They are......
1). Expert comittee suggested only 2 bits out of 6 are ambigious and can be deleated. If Appsc deletes those only 3 members out of 16000 will be effected.
2). If it deletes all the 6 bits then a total of 200-300 candidates will be effected out of 16000 candidates who already wrote mains exam.
3). Apart from these technicalities, the present AP law and order situation does not permit any state level exam conduction (AP TET, DSC, ALL University entrance Tests...etc were cancelled already) because of ANDHRA - Telamgana Bifurcation issue. So APPSC cannot conduct Re Mains to all the candidates.
respected Sirs,
My questions are....
1). Can we file a review petition again in SC by taking all this issues to Honerable Justice's Mr. Chalameswar sir and Mr. Gokale sirs....
2). is there any chance to accept this review petition on the above said grounds.....
3). If accepted, in which way can we argue to avoid remains as there is no single mistake on our part....
4). If possible please guess the possible out come judgement ......
Thank you sirs...please give your valuable advice as early as possible....
Chandy Thomas
13 October 2013 at 10:19
IS IT POSSIBLE TO REGISTER A PVT LTD COMPANY FOR PLANTATION/FARMING PURPOSE IN THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ?
Srimadhavi
13 October 2013 at 09:27
I was told by some one that girls born after 1981 only are eligible for fathers property. Is it correct?
Is there any time limit to claim my share after my fathers death?
Regards
Madhavi
Nagendra
13 October 2013 at 08:41
I am not able to use my HDFC debit card on merchant websites like PayPal, Amazon etc. HDFC Bank said they only allow usage of their debit cards on "Verified by VISA' merchant websites. Also, I am not able to use my HDFC card at a "verified by Visa' website i.e.EntroPay.com
Can a bank restrict usage of their cards on some specific sites?
Should I go to a district consumer forum?
BIPIN MEHTA
13 October 2013 at 08:03
I WANT FULL JUDGEMENT DECIDED BY MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM IN CASE OF COMPLAIN MADE BY KANYO MERANI AGAINST BUILDER PEDIYAR ASSOCIATES
NEWS OF JUDGEMENT PUBLISH IN TIMES OF INDIA DT 08/10/2013
rajeshwar
13 October 2013 at 02:29
dear sir
My father property is a ground plus two floor building. we are 3 children and he has given us settlement deeds for each floor ( one floor to each child ). Now I want to convert the ground floor from residential use to commercial use . Is the consent of others needed for the change ? can they go to court and prevent me from making the change. I am from tamilnadu Please advice
rajeshwar
13 October 2013 at 02:27
dear sir
My father property is a ground plus two floor building. we are 3 children and he has given us settlement deeds for each floor ( one floor to each child ). Now I want to convert the ground floor from residential use to commercial use . Is the consent of others needed for the change ? can they go to court and prevent me from making the change. Please advice
gajendra singh
13 October 2013 at 00:51
Dear sir/madam,
My case is related to the medical negligence and i want to that the limitation of this case has ended or not. on 14 July 2012, a doctor has penetrated injunction on wrong place of leg, due to this the leg has paralyzed and had host their power.
Thanks.
Member (Account Deleted)
12 October 2013 at 23:40
Respected Adv,
What to do when very important true ceritified copy ( as proof ) lost just before submission of Proofs in court on date. I have photocopy of true certified copy.
RAMJI
12 October 2013 at 23:14
Dear experts
This is an RTI case. Filed CC in DCDRF claiming compensation. Opposite party (public info officer) filed a CMP for "rejection of complaint" . I filed counter, judge wanted me to file citations in support of my case, i filed. Later OP was asked to reply but GP appeared on behalf of OP and filed a citation of High court judgement against my complaint and finally DCDRF allowed CMP and rejected my complaint. The most interesting thing is that the referred cited orders have been overlooked by high bench at madurai in another rti case...this was not known to the learned president of dcdrf who passed orders....after pronouncing orders he asked me whether i read the cited judgment.. i said i read that too and also i read the other one which overlooked the same at bench.... learned president was shocked...i was so cool... and said i have next remedy your honour!
my questions are:
1. What is the next step for me ( either to file appeal or review?)If it is revision should i file it in State commission ?
2. order was pronounced on 3.10.13 but still order not ready in printed form... what is the maximum time limit for the dcdrf to issue orders in writing?
3. Is this order copy mandatory for me to file appeal or revision in next level i.e state commission?
4. Is there any court fee to be paid for appeal or revision if so
5. Is there any template / format for appeal in consumer complaint cases.. kindly give web site address if any
6.any other views?
regards
ramji
Recruitment matters
Dear Sir,
In 2011 december Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission released a notification for Group - 1 services exam. I am an aspirant of group - 1 services of Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission(APPSC). In May - 2011, APPSC conducted preliminary exmination (objective in nature) for group-1 services exam in which a total of 16000 members filtered for Mains exam out of 1,80,000 of total aspirants appeared for the exam.
After preliminary filteration some candidates went to APAT saying that there are 13 wrong answers in the preliminary examination key published by Appsc. When it went to APPSC notice, it appointed an expert commitee to revise the key objections filed by those aspirants. After careful analysis Expert commitee advised appsc to correct 7 answers out of 13 mentioned by those aspirants. Appsc accepted the suggestions made by expert commitee and altered the Mains selection list(Preliminary cleared aspirants list) as per the new key.
With this revised new list AP Public service commission went ahead and conducted Mains (Descripttive) exam for those 16000(Approximately) and shortlisted 606 candidates for interview. In February and March 2013 APPSC conducted interviews for those 606 candidates and ready to release the final merit list for the 314 posts.
In the mean time the aspirants who were filed the petition earlier went to Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal ( APAT ) and asked it to direct APPSC to revise the remaining 6 bits (13 - 7 mentioned above) also and stop the process. But APAT refused to direct Appsc to stop the process. Instead APAT directed APPSC to continue the selection process but should not release final merit list until the final judgement.
After some hearings APAT ordered APPSC to appoint another expert commitee to look into the 6bits. After indepth anlysis The expert commitee advised Appsc to remove 2 bits to avoid ambiguity as they have more than one correct answers and no objections for 4bits.
But the aspirants went to High court saying that they cant believe the expert commitee report as it was appointed by APPSC itself. Then highcourt ordered UPSC to look into this matter and submit its report within one month.
As they questioned the genunity of Appsc and its expert commitee and delaying the selection process, Appsc filed Special Leave Petition in Supreme Court to vacate the stay order given by AP High Court.
After careful analysis The Honerable Supreme court Bench comprised of Honerable Justices Mr. Chalameswar Sir and Mr. Gokale Sir announced the judgement by ordering APPSC to delete all the six bits which are ambigious and reprepare the mains selection list and reconduct the entire mains exam once again to all 16000aspirants.
But the fact is, even after repreparing the list after deleting the 6 bits also....99% of the candidates who wrote earlier will be also in the new list and have to write Mains exam (Total of 6 discripttive papers) once again.
[As I am one of the 606 candidates who sucussfully cleared Preliminary - Mains - Interview stages.....i know how hard it is to prepare for these stages. If remains conducted all of us loose almost 2 years of time which was dedicated for this preparation and confidence also. In the entire process we did not have neither a role nor did a mistake. Why because the entire selection process is under the control of APPSC. But still we were the loosers and has to write the exam once again and nothing will happen to those professor who prepared the wrong key and Appsc officials who conducted the exams based on such a key]
As per some legal experts APPSC did some blunders and missed some key points in filing its counter.
They are......
1). Expert comittee suggested only 2 bits out of 6 are ambigious and can be deleated. If Appsc deletes those only 3 members out of 16000 will be effected.
2). If it deletes all the 6 bits then a total of 200-300 candidates will be effected out of 16000 candidates who already wrote mains exam.
3). Apart from these technicalities, the present AP law and order situation does not permit any state level exam conduction (AP TET, DSC, ALL University entrance Tests...etc were cancelled already) because of ANDHRA - Telamgana Bifurcation issue. So APPSC cannot conduct Re Mains to all the candidates.
respected Sirs,
My questions are....
1). Can we file a review petition again in SC by taking all this issues to Honerable Justice's Mr. Chalameswar sir and Mr. Gokale sirs....
2). is there any chance to accept this review petition on the above said grounds.....
3). If accepted, in which way can we argue to avoid remains as there is no single mistake on our part....
4). If possible please guess the possible out come judgement ......
Thank you sirs...please give your valuable advice as early as possible....