LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

AK New Delhi   25 October 2013 at 18:47

Mutation of property

My friend died and left an unregistered will in favour of his wife. He owns a flat in south delhi which is officially valued at 2 cr.

My friend also has two daughters who are ready to relinquish their rights in the said property. This property comes under MCD.

1. How can this property be transferred in the wife's name?
2. Can she go to the registrar directly along with the daughters and their relinquishment deeds and request for mutation? or
3, She has to get the will 'probate' from the court and then get it transferred?

4. Which will be cheaper in terms of the fee/courtfee etc?

VISHNU   25 October 2013 at 18:42

Maintainability of criminal appeal before session court after acquital of accused inpvt complaint

Sir

1. Complainant filed pvt complaint before JMIC AND ACCUSED ACQUITTED. AFTER COMPLAINANT FILED LEAVE TO APPEAL BEFORE HIGH COURT WHO DISPOSED BY SAYING THAT DUE TO AMENDED PROV OF 372 Cr pc appellant has LIBERTY TO APPROACH TO SESSION COURT first. Complaint filed appeal in Session court and court framed issue of limitation because petition filed before is time bare 300 days above. evidence on application by both side on con-donation of delay is over. Session court is not inclinded to hear argument on condonation of delay by saying that due to full bench judgment the appeal is not maintainable as lies to high court. Query are
1. whether it is necessary to ask to court by putting application to decided limitation before final disposal of case . Appeal was also time bar at High court which is not decided by high court while disposing the appeal by order.
2. Petition maintainability is before limitation or after deciding limitation. Time bar appeal is no appeal in eyes of law unless decided.
submitted for early reply

MandyPunjab   25 October 2013 at 18:37

Regarding employment details in attestation form

Dear sir,

I have been selected for a central govt. job. Prior to this I had worked in a private company for 3 months and was retrenched from that company for unauthorized absence for one month. After that I paid the bond amount and settled the full and final payment with the company. Now I have to fill attestation form.
Kindly suggest me shall I fill the job details in the form or not?
Please tell me if I fill this job details, will this have any negative consequences ?
And what if I dont fill these details because it was a private company ?

AK New Delhi   25 October 2013 at 18:37

Limitation period for filing civil appeal

My relative filed a suit for possession by partition against me at faridabad court in lower court. I lost the case and appealed to the Sessions court, faridabad. I again lost it in the sessions court. Now I shall file a Leave to Appeal in the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Can you tell me the limitation period (no. of days) I have in hand to file the appeal in High Court?

AK New Delhi   25 October 2013 at 18:32

Limitation period for filing appeal

I filed a case u/s 138/141 NI Act in faridabad(haryana) court.

The accused was acquitted by the court. I have to file an appeal in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. What is the maximum limitation period (no. of days) I have, to file the appeal against acquittal?

J SRINIVASAN   25 October 2013 at 18:23

R t i request

Dear Sir
I am working in National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC Limited) a PSU under Ministries of Power. Can any one help me please , can I submit RTI online request to Ministries of Power seeking data from NTPC Limited . The data is required to me to prepare defense for my criminal case.

Shekhar sriman   25 October 2013 at 18:14

Is buying an irrevokable notarised gpa property valid?

Hi,

I have identified a plot in Bangalore. The price of the property is quite reasonable since I'm buying it from my father's friend.

Issue is:
My father's friend is the GPA holder of this property. He holds an irrevokable notarised (not registered) GPA from the original owner. He had bought this property from the first person in 1985 & then there were no registrations happening & hence he obtained a notarised GPA which was never registered. This is also mentioned in the GPA. It was an ancestral proerty of the first owner and both father & son have given consent to the property in the GPA. Now one of them have expired.

However, few years ago it seems they had made a claim on this property & the matter was taken to a nearby police station where the issue was settled by the inspector by advicing the claimant not to make false claims as the property has been handed over 25 years ago & the matter has subsided. But I'm concerned if they would again make a claim in the future after I buy the property.

As I have mentioned earlier, since i'm getting it for a reasonable price, I'm estimating the risks. If it's too risky, I'm ready to drop the plan of buying it.

Regards,
Anonymous.

hiren   25 October 2013 at 18:11

Section 6 of cst

Dear Sir,
Party A(Gujarat) Sales to party B(Gujarat) and then party B(Gujarat) sales to party C(Hariyana). Now, Party B(Gujarat) instructed to party A(Gujarat) to deliver the goods directly to party C(Hariyana) under "sales in trasit " under section 6 of CST Act.

Now, my question is whether "A" will charge CST or "B" will charge.....?

Again my question is who will issue form C to whom...?

rds   25 October 2013 at 17:35

U/s. 138 of n.i act

Respected Sir,
I am from complainant side.

Our case U/s 138 of N.I act

Our case states is 313 statements is over and defendant came for defense witness is also over.

Now accused delay the matter with the help of cheque handwriting expert.

On his D.W-1 he says that I give cheque and on the cheque signature is also my and now he delay this matter with the help of handwriting experts.

Please give me judgment on accused cannot delay this matter with the help of handwriting experts.

Thank You.

mukesh jain   25 October 2013 at 17:32

Release of commercial property sec 4/17 land acq.act.

dear sir,
a commercial property acqusition notic under sec 4/17 land acq.act in 2008.by uttar pradesh govt.
the owner filed a writ in the high cout to quash the acqusition, and it was accepted to maintain the status. owner still hold the possesion and doing his business.
In the year 2012 govt of uttar prdesh issued a G.O to release all properties, and given order to D.M,and Lucknow development authority to release the above propertis.and to inform the govt.but they did not take any action on the above matter,till now.
one of the owner is interested in selling his property but he has no clear document from the govt. except the photo copy of the G.O. issued by the state secratery.
please give your kind advice.
thanks