sk..........
27 October 2013 at 09:20
In revision petition court sent notice before admisssion to why petition should not be admitted now what should i do.
RITESH RANJAN
27 October 2013 at 07:19
INCREMENT DURING PROBATION
Respected Madam/s & Sir/s,
With much hope, I humbly pray for clarification on the subject cited above. The brief of facts and circumstances for your kind perusal is appended below:
1) I joined Govt. of India service on 30th January, 2004 at the Integrated Test Range, DRDO, Ministry of Defence as Assitant (Hindi) in the Pay Scale of 5000 - 150 - 8000 /-. There I completed my probation period of two years as was prescribed in my offer of appointment. Then after, the Competent Authority therein closed my probation and confirmed my services on with retrospective effect.
2) In the year 2006, I applied for the post of Junior Hindi Translator in my present Deptt. of Atomic Energy through Proper Channel which carried the Pay Scale of 5500 - 175 - 9000 /- as then advertised. There, I got selected and the offer of appointment was served to me on which, I accepted and joined my present work place on 25th January, 2010.
3) At my previous workplace I was placed in PB-2 with G.P. 4,200 /- by virtue of 6th Pay Commission and on the date of my relieve in consequent to Technical Resignation from there i.e.,12th January, 2010 my Pay in the Pay Band was 11,650 /- and G.P. was 4200 /-.
4) It is admitted that the Offer of Appointment from my present Deptt. included a provision of 01 (ONE) year PROBATION and nature of my service as TEMPORARY.
Regarding the same, in my application addressed to my present Deptt. I sought some clarity regarding PAY PROTECTION and LIEN with concerns of my service security. In response to the same, they answered “in order to avail past service benefits, I must submit TECHNICAL RESIGNATION and then join” which I adhered to.
5) But, to my utter surprise on JULY, 2010 I was not given any increment. When I sought clarification regarding the same, I was told that my PROBATIONARY PERIOD has not been closed as it is in RULES that A PERSONNEL UNDER PROBATION WILL NOT BE PROVIDED INCREMENT.
6) Here a noteworthy fact is that, in my Previous Deptt. (DRDO/Min of Defence) I was given increment in January, 2005 under then prevalent Increment conditions.
7) In the meantime, due to some unfortunate happenings my wife deserted me in JUNE, 2009. After many futile attempts of reunion, I filed a DIVORCE CASE U/s - 13 of the Hindus Marriage Act, 1955 against her in the month of JULY, 2009. In an immediate counter blast, I along with my family members was roped in a 498 A case (Dowry Harassment) and the Cr.P.C. 125 (Interim Maintenance) by my wife in the month of AUGUST, 2009 & OCTOBER, 2009 respectively. Afterwards, she even wrote a letter to the Head of my previous Deptt. regarding the cases upon which I submitted my humble written clarification when my previous office asked me to.
8) Before your Learned and empathetic self, I submit that after getting information that I along with my old parents and unmarried sisters have been named in a 498 A case, I started to run from post to pillar for getting relief in form of Anticipatory Bail. (Till then the Hon’ble Court hadn’t taken COGNIZANCE upon the same and the case was in enquiry status).
9) In the month of April, 2010 only the Hon’ble Court took Cognizance after
which I fell under tremendous mental, physical and economical pressure of saving my Parents’ dignity and future of my sisters. After ultra-minute hardship, by the Grace of God, I along with my family members was granted Anticipatory Bail by the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Patna in the month of August, 2010 (for my parents) & December, 2010 (for self).
10) In between, somewhere during the month of October, 2010 my wife wrote on other letter to my present Head of the Office regarding the cases. After that, I again submitted my humble clarification when asked to, with a prayer to not take any coercive action against me till the Hon’ble Court’s order.
11) That, during this whole period from the 25th January, 2010 (my date of joining the present Deptt.) to till date, I have not been issued any letter mentioning EXTENSION OF MY PROBATION PERIOD, INITIATION OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION, IMPOSITION OF PENALTY etc. by my office.
12)Respected Sir/Madam, till today I have been kept deprived of my Increments, Performance Related Incentive and any Advance other than Festival Advance.
REQUEST
a) Please clarify, whether it was right to keep me under Probation as I was already Confirmed in the same Grade Pay of 4,200/- by my previous office and both my previous and present posts carry same job profile and responsibilities. Can I get my increments ?
b) Please clarify, whether it is right to not grant me Increments.
c) What remedial measures are open for me and the chances of getting orders from the Hon'ble Judiciary as desired ?
For the act of which kindness, I shall be ever grateful to you.
Thanking you, for your valuable time,
Yours faithfully,
Place : Shillong.
Date : 27th Oct, 2013.
(RITESH RANJAN)
GIRISH AGRAWAL
26 October 2013 at 23:41
मामले का संछिप्त विवरण
==================
1.मई-2009 को पांच आरोपियों नें मिलकर वायदा बाज़ार (एम.सी.एक्स/एनसीडीएक्स) की आड़ में जिला दुर्ग के 24 लोगों से एक करोड़ रूपये की ठगी की है।
2.25 मई को मुख्य आरोपी फरार हो गया।
3.दिनांक 27 जुलाई 2009 से 28 अगस्त 2009 के बीच 10 पीड़ितों ने पुलिस थाने में अपनी अपनी लिखित शिकायत सबूतों के साथ दर्ज कर सभी पांचों आरोपियों पर आपराध दर्ज करनें की मांग की ।
4.पुलिस ने आरोपियों के प्रभाववश पूर्व में दिए 10 पीड़ितों के आवेदनों को नज़रअंदाज़ कर बाद में दिए एक पीड़ित के कमजोर आवॆदन पर एक मात्र मुख्य आरोपी पर धारा 420 का प्रकरण दर्ज कर दी ।
5.आज चार साल बाद पुलिस आरोपी के नहीं मिलने पर धारा 299 CRPC के तहत चालान पेश कर मामले को रफा दफा करना चाह रही है.
6.पुलिस फरारी चालन पेश करने के लिए हमसे धारा 160 CRPC के तहत नोटिस भेजकर हमारी फोटो मांग रही है । हमने सभी आरोपियों पर कार्यवाही की मांग करते हुए फोटो देने से इंकार कर दिए हैं.
हम पीड़ितों को उचित सलाह देने कि कृपा करें।
....धन्यवाद !
वायदा बाज़ार पीड़ित मोर्चा
जिला दुर्ग छत्तीसगढ़
Short description of the case
============================
1.In May 2009 five accused under the guise of formal forward market(MCX/NCDX) district fortification consisting of 24 people cheated of more than Rs one crore.
2.On May 25 main accused Absconding.
3.Between July 27 to 28 August 2009, 10 victims filed a written complaint with evidence in police station and demanding legal action against the all five accused.
4.Police ignored earlier applications of the 10 victims were later a vulnerable application on a file FIR us 420 IPC against only main accused.
5.Four years later, the police charged us 299 CRPC upon the present case the invoice is trying to dismiss.
6.Police sending us a notice under Section 160 of the CRPC is asking for our photos. We demand action against all five accused and we denied the photo.
What can we do..?
Thanks for Advice
All Victims,Vayda Bazar Pidit Morcha
Durg(Chhattisgarh)
adv.durgadas k.kulkarni
26 October 2013 at 23:17
R/sir,
X issued cheque in favour of Y on 26/09/2013,presented on 28/09/2013 returned on same day with reason "account closed".
Today Y approached me and asked to issue legal notice u/s. 138.Limitation for issuence of notice comes to an end tomorrow. Tomorrow is holiday.
Can I issue notice on Monday (28/10/2013)?
Whether the date on which the returned memo has received include in the 30 days of limitation?
hrishikesh
26 October 2013 at 22:48
There are 5 directors in a private ltd company.all having equal share holding of
AJ Agarwal
26 October 2013 at 21:59
I had taken a Development Authority (KDA) plot/house of 350 sq yds., and have also got it freehold done now, by paying the KDA their requisite charges. Can I freely sell the half-portion of the land 175 sq yds., by didviding it myself ? or do I need to approach some authority to get the division done ??
Subhash Chandra Sharma
26 October 2013 at 20:36
Sir I want to know sort of crimes or offences for which we can ask or request a bail in police station.
Thanks in the meantime.
Yours Subhash chandra sharma
SANJAY
26 October 2013 at 18:54
My home loan account was with NBFC, which closed the business and was not available for collecting dues.
Suddenly after 2 years a Bank has contacted me to pay the Principle + Int as one shot payment. They have also served me notice under section 13 (2) of surfaesi Act, please guide the remeady avialble to me, as per Banker they have purchased the Portfolio for 50% and are claiming 100%+ int from me, other wise they would take possession of my Housing property. Please guide and help.
Rajesh
26 October 2013 at 18:16
1 - What documents are required for the mutation of a flat in Mumbai to a legal heir?
2 - What is the cost of completing mutation to a legal heir?
3- How much time does the process take?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Decree
Can Person Get Decree on the basis of Hibanama.
property possession in Person.