Mohammed Vaid
10 November 2013 at 12:58
Hi,
Our society has installed 2 telecom towers on our society terrace. Our tax consultant has informed us that income from telecom towers are flatly taxable after 30% of standard deduction.
Is there anyway to save tax on this income? Please advice.
Vijay
10 November 2013 at 08:40
Dear Sir,
I bought 1 property in Jan,2007 as 3rd purchaser.I took a loan and all the papers were in place.Since then i am leaving peacefully in same property with clean possession
Assigned
09 November 2013 at 23:49
Hello
We are living in porombok land which has been issued 3 assigned house pattas(Mother, one Daughter unmarried while patta has been issued and another daughter married) from the MRO(Mandal Revenue Officer).
Is it legally eligible or not eligible?
Can assigned house pattas issued to 3 family members which is a single building as 3 portions?
Vyas Desai
09 November 2013 at 23:42
I am from karnataka and governed by Hindu Mithakshara Law
1965- Partition between my great grand father, grand father and my father. My father was minor and seperate share was alloted to him and this is upheld by our High Court.
1985-My great grand father wills his share of property to his wife before his death.
1997- Suit for partition filed against all the properties by my major brother, mother and me being minor represented by my mother in OS 60/1997.
1998- My great grand mother died intestate leaving all the properties to her only son Ramrao
2008- High Court partly allows by giving my brother, mother and me equal share in our father's properties but rejects in properties standing in name of my grand father as these properties were given to him during partition. For 2 other properties of my father remanded back to trial court.
2010- I attain Majority
2011- FDP filed for properties in which we were given share in OS 60/1997.
August 2013- My grand father dies testate willing his properties to his daughter i.e. my aunt.
September 2013- It comes to our knowledge that some of properties which my grand father willed to his daughter are not the ones he got in partition but inherited from his mother who died intestate. These properties were actually alloted to the share of my great grand father which he willed to his wife who died intestate.
As the suit OS 60/1997 is remanded regarding additional evidence to some of my fathers properties and FDP pending.
Can I ask for share in properties inherited by my grand father from his mother who died intestate?
I want to ask for share in property as my father also has share. These properties in total were willed to my aunt.
And FDP is pending with regards to some properties. And OS is also remanded for other properties.
Naresh kumar Gowd
09 November 2013 at 20:34
What is meant by posting stage=For orders in high court
yashpal
09 November 2013 at 20:17
please inform under which act's which section /statue / powers bank holidays are declared by state government, if possible pl quote the text of that section.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
09 November 2013 at 19:03
To Advocate Mr. Rajad Bindal,
You may contact Advocate Mr. Suresh Kumar of Bangalore whose phone no. is 09341231835, a senior counsel, he may be of use to you for your purpose, you can refer my name: Advocate Kalaiselvan, Vellore, my ph No. is 09443441062.
Riya Sharma
09 November 2013 at 18:14
Hello,
I need expert opinion regarding time barred claim.
We took an educational loan in 2007. Till 2009, we paid all the EMIs regularly. Later the bank misplaced/mishandled the loan details and refused to accept the EMI. By mistake they saved it as a Housing Loan instead of Educational Loan. Even after repeatedly asking for the EMI details, they didn't give us any details of outstanding loan amount. Therefore we stopped paying installments. There was no notice sent by the bank till 3 years.
After 3 years, in 2013, they called my father and asked for the payment. My father knew about the Time Barred limitation and hence he didn't give any acknowledgement to the bank. My father asked them to send a legal notice but the bank manger didn't send us any notice (as he knows that they can't get the claim legally after 3 years).
One month back, some amount was debited to the account for Income Tax rebate. The Bank is not allowing us to take the money from the account anymore saying that it is a "Freeze Account" in lien of the unpaid educational loan. The amount is shown as a ledger transaction not available for withdrawal. The available balance is shown as negative amount.
Is it legal for the bank to lien a account for a Time Barred loan? What can we do to withdraw the money from this account? Please advice us regarding this.
Thanking you in anticipation.
Best Regards,
Priya.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Propar method to show respondent
I am drafting a PIL for the rights of Innovator and Researcher of India.
The respondent of my case is
Department of Science & Technology
Now give me clarification which method is proper between following two ways to show as respondent in my PIL
Method No 1
Secretary, Department of Science & Technology,
Technology Bhavan, New Mehrauli Road,
New Delhi – 110016
Method No 2.
Union of India,
Through Secretary, Department of Science & Technology,
Technology Bhavan, New Mehrauli Road,
New Delhi – 110016
There are some questions in my mind,
1) What is the difference between that above two methods to show as respondent?
2) Which method is proper and why?
3) Give me some more general information about this issue please.