LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Jaswinder Singh   26 December 2013 at 19:45

Women mentally harassment at work place

My Wife working in water supply department on contractual basis. she is a field worker. other 4 field workers are male. all field staff visit in field in official bolero. my wife daily harassed by male field staff, some time they abused her, some time they ignore to go in field with her. some lime they leave her in office to create some problems. they make pressure on her to give signatures on fake bills, they demand money 2000 or 3000 for official expenses. now on dated 5/12/2013 may wife present in office. all staff were on leave. on dated 6/12/2013 SDO cut the attendance and cross on it.in the evening my wife gives a written complaint to Xen with scan copy of attendance. but no step take by xen against them peoples. xen refused my complaints without listen my problem and give me warning for termination. plz help me what I can do

Anita Singh   26 December 2013 at 19:21

Legal document

Dear Expert


My father had purchased two flat actually both the two flat is combine and joint one flat is of my my mothers name and the second one is of my father but my father has been expired in 2005 and my father flat which bears his name he had given to my elder married sister through gift deed now my elder sister wants to give equal share in the same flat to all of us as we have total four sister including my elder sister so i want to know which legal document we can prepare for the same

R.MALLIKARJUN   26 December 2013 at 18:19

Gratuity to contract labour

Sir, Please answer my doubt, sir is a contract labour is eligible for gratuity after completing 5 years of continues service, If contractor and principal employer made an agreement of not paying gratuity then is it ok as per labour act in andhrapradesh or is it compulsory to pay gratuity ?

thanks in advance

kamal arora   26 December 2013 at 18:10

Change of advocate

one advocate defended me in a case then after one year for same plantiff he stood oppositeto me pls advice

sienna   26 December 2013 at 17:36

Live in relation

dear sir

m from delhi living wid amerried man,his wife include my name in voter list as a wife..........now presentg that an evedence...in bi gamy case nd dv case also running in saket court.........plzz help i never married to him.........

sruti gupta   26 December 2013 at 16:34

Abatement of reference before aaifr

Reference of a company before BIFR was abated to which the said company appealed before AAIFR. However in the mean while a secured creditor claiming to hold 3/4th of the debt undertook an action under sec. 13(4) of SARFAESI Act. when the such action of the secured creditor was countered by the Company AAIFR directed the Company to move to DRT saying that it do not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the same. While the Company moved before DRT, can AAIFR legally abate the Company's reference before it. Plz advice.


saju s s   26 December 2013 at 16:17

Abolition of no objection certificate system

all public sector companies( except NTPC) and other central/state govt companies/depts are insisting on producing NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE (noc) from candidates who work in one of these organisations & wish to join other govt organisation. Some companies have formulated their own rules eg. they will issue NOC only after 3/5 years of service.but even after this period , they say it is at the discretion of the mgmt and deny NOC to eligible candidates.
I am a victim of such policy. I have lost better opportunities because of this policy because my company denied me NOC.( They r not ready even to accept the application).
i have come across hundreds of such candidates( engineers/non engineers) who have lost excellent opportunities because of this NOC rule which would have drastically improved their career and personal lives. Instead, they are stuck with a boring/not promising job. it is notable that private sector is not that stringent in case of NOC but INDIA GOVT Companies are hell bent on rules which are ultimately leading to employee dissatisfaction and less productivity.
my question is
1) why govt of india should put a hurdle on the career growth and freedom of an employee to choose his career and job?
2) working in govt company is equivalent to bonded labour? once you join govt company u r locked up?
3) whether govt is promoting people to join private sector than to govt sector?

i would like to challenge this court...i want the system of NOC should be abolished....an individual should be free to change his career and job of his choice while working itself....i need some guidance on this issue...

Pradeep Kumar   26 December 2013 at 16:03

498a

Hello ALl,

My wife has filed 498A 3&4 against me and my family in the month of May.Now Chargesheet has been filed only I have received the summons from Police ,they have said my parents and my sister name has been removed.My first hering date is on 21/04/2014.
Now anyone can tell me that what my wife and my lawyer do right now?
1.can they apply for reinvestigation at this stage if it so ,what are the possibilities?
2.Can they ask police to file amended charagesheet?
3.During trial whether can they ask my parents name has to be included?If they do so,how much strong the case is?
4.As I told in my previous queries ,My wife and her father they have arrested remanded in Jail for 10 days later released on Bail based on cyber crime complaints total 13 nos.For morphing my sister ,mother and mine in to nude body publishing in Facebook and pornograpic websites.
Arrested under IT ACT 66A,67A & sec 4 TNHWA
And am also am having her medical reports which I I have treated her for physcological diseases and her accepted too all the statements am having.

Please tell me how much storng case is from my side once i receive official copy of chargesheet whether I can go for Quasing ?Within How many days Can I go for quasing?

Regards,
Pradeep

Mohamed gayas   26 December 2013 at 15:59

Neighbour constructed building g+4 without setback

I am the resident of Bangalore, my neighbor has constructed apartment building, Still floor + 4 upper floors adjcent to my property without any setback & using my setback space for ventilation, maintaince etc, As he has constructed the building while it was under CMC limlt,But now it is under BBMP limlt. he has already taken BESCO & BWSSB sewage connection & has rented all 3 upper floor & staying in Ground Floor, My question is
1. can I put a case to close all his ventilation towards my property?
2. If the property doesn't have setback of minimum 1 meter setback, will he able to keep ventilation on neighbor's property?
3. will Akrama Sakrama bill will help him, not to close his ventilation?

SUNIL KUMAR.C   26 December 2013 at 15:47

Scope of a civil suit when the criminal case is on its way

Dear Experts,
I had 376 cents (1.52 hectares) of wet land in Kerala which is suitable for prawns cultivation or fish farming. But this wet area having no boundaries physically and the whole property was like a lake. I have sold 219 cents from the above property to one of my natives in 2001 on the oral agreement that he will construct a longitudinal straight line bund as his property boundary so that both parties can do fish farming. But the proposed bund will not match with the existing revenue department records because it is more expensive and also if it is constructing according to the revenue records the bund will not be in a straight line. So this was agreed and the buyer constructed the bund as per the agreement. This bund is the actual boundary of his 219 cents of wet land which I sold to him. The size of this mud bund is 220 meter long, 2 meter wide and 1.5 to 3 meter deep approximately and the buyer planted coconut trees and bamboos in the bund. Now the trees are grown up and aged 8 to 10 years.
At the time of registration of the sale deed ,In order to construct the bund in straight line the buyer had to divide the area of three survey sub divisions, one part is for the buyer and the other part will remain same as my possession and title. This was agreed and then the buyer employed a retired government surveyor to prepare a plan as per the said agreement in line with the government revenue records. Then the buyer and the surveyor together entrusted a document writer to prepare his sale deed as per the newly prepared plan. But the document writer included the entire areas of these three survey sub divisions into the sale deed without considering the agreement between the buyer and seller and he ignored the newly prepared plan .Thus a mistake has happened in this sale deed in survey numbers and extent of the property. As a result of this 34 cents of area mistakenly get included in this sale deed in addition to the agreement. But these 34 cents are not within his bund boundary, anybody can see as the bund still exists. Thus the real intention of the seller is not properly reflected in the documents executed, but I have not been noticed this mistake. The sale consideration received from the buyer is only according to the actual agreement and as per the plan prepared by his surveyor. The buyer never went to village office for pokkuvaravu to get included this property in the revenue records.
After that in 2005, I have sold the remaining portion of the said wet area and my other dry land to another buyer without knowing the mistake happened in first buyer’s deed. I have signed off the sale deed of second buyer prepared by her document writer in good faith. In addition to the above mistake, the second buyer went to village office to do pokkuvaravu for her property. The village officer incorrectly put together the first buyer’s property and the second buyer’s as a whole in the said three survey numbers to the second buyer’s thandapper register and he remitted property tax for the entire area of the said three survey sub divisions. Regarding the possession of the property, there are no any problems and disputes. The dispute is only in the documents.
Then the first buyer filed a complaint against me before the district collector alleging the pokkuvaravu done by the village officer for second buyer while I was working abroad. The district collector directed the police to prosecute me and the police filed FIR and charge sheet in view of the directions given by the district collector.. The collector and the police never gave me an opportunity to enlarge myself on hearing and investigation; even I never received a notice for hearing and neither revenue officers nor police visited the disputed land.
I was not aware about this issue as I have been working abroad. Now I realized that it was a cheating by the first buyer, his surveyor and the document writer to get the whole property at the time of the registration of his sale deed for unlawful gain. I believe that this is a case of criminal conspiracy and breach of trust and is an act done by several persons for common intention. So I filed a case before the court against the first buyer, his surveyor and his document writer (scribe) under sections IPC 120b, 420,406 & 34. Now both criminal cases are on its way.
I am dealing with the effects of this case. I would be more than happy if you could provide me a proper guidance in this regard and I would like to see the issues actually to determine the level of impact and risks. Can someone please guide me how to confront the case before the court of law? What do you think about the scope of a civil suit for the cancellation of the sale deeds of the disputed property? If so I can apply for the complete measurement of the property by a govt. surveyor to determine whether the said 34 cents of wet land is within his possession or not .In addition, I can ask for an advocate commission to determine the genuineness of the first buyer’s complaint. I am expecting a comprehensive reply.
With great admiration and respect, Sunil