Member (Account Deleted)
30 December 2013 at 12:10
My wri wp 21313 /2013 filed on 16/7 in AP HC.It was transferred to another Judge as soon as admitted on 18/7/13 stated to be wrongly posted by the Registrar.
It was taken up up 8 Aug in court no 5 when the GP home was given two weeks time to file their counter.None is filed as on date.In Oct 2013 my case was transfered to another court court No 10 with another judge. My case has been listed in the cause list at least 4 times in one month at the tail end or on onward list and never ever taken up by the respective judges despite several pleas by my advocate verbal as well as written.Fed up I had taken the NOC in the month of Nov and submited an appeal to the hon'ble CJ to hear me in person and to expedite..it has not happened.Now I find that the said Judge is missing from the list of Judge in court's site. Court No 10 is also not found included..What could be the reason? What happened to my case ? Who decides to whom it will go? And what is the next step if hon'ble CJ finds no time for me to even make a reply.its a life and death situation for my daughter whose admission to MBBS via EAMCET CAP quota is affected by such in action?
sudhi raj f
30 December 2013 at 11:33
Dear Sir,
Land Occupant had sold the land to Third party without intimating the "Other Rights holders of the said property. Now the Third party name appears in Form I&XIV.
Mutation of the land also completed without intimating the Other rights owners.
Please advise what action to be taken.
Regards,
Suraj
Rajaramana RV
30 December 2013 at 10:54
Dear Experts,
This is a section 326 case where the accused has been found to be suffering from schizophrenia by the government hospital and in his state has been accused of attacking the opposite party. How can he be released from this case? Can such a case be quashed under any special provision. The victim has also alleged that the person was suffering from mental illness at time of incident. Need help in solving this case for a friend.
adv.durgadas k.kulkarni
30 December 2013 at 10:53
Respected,
Which step should take when notice has returned unserved with remarks "Addressee left"?
Can cheque be presented again and then issue notice if said cheque dishonoured?
Drawee is credit society and the drawer is the borrower?
youngbro
30 December 2013 at 10:49
Respected lawyers,
My brother 's wife used to ignore him completely and go to her work/team outings which pissed off my brother and he sent some emails and chats in harsh /nasty way is it serious evidence in 498a ???
btech graduate
30 December 2013 at 08:47
respected sir,
what does it meant by acquittal on merits on procedural/ technical grounds?
does quashing of an FIR come under the above?
krg
30 December 2013 at 07:24
sir i am only daughter for my parents aged 22 my mothers father and mother are alive my mother has two elder brothers my grand father is an agriculturist
he has got the property from his father he sold some part of land and build a house the two brothers made my mother and her father and mother to sine a family property settlement giving only 10%of the total property
where as my mother has a wright equal to male children
the settlement is registered is it possible for my mother hes equal share
manjupatil
30 December 2013 at 05:13
Hi There
I'm an NRI, I have 2 questions 1. I have grandfather's property in India, my father registered 12 acres land to my mother and 20 acres land still on my fathers name both are my Grandfathers property. Now they are threatening that property belong to us we will give it to daughters(my sisters). If the property is given to my sisters,do I have right to go to the court please advice how to stop this. 2. My Aunty(My fathers sister) given some property to my father as a gift property. Do I have a right on this property please let me know.
Thanks !
ravi
30 December 2013 at 00:48
Hi
I am from chennai and living in my current residence from 1982.
I am a member of Lawyers club for ~3 years
I am having a pet dog, I am taking it for a walk daily for the past 2 years in the road backside to my house which is just 30 secs away from my house. 2 days before few men living in that road called me and said I should take my dog for a walk only in the main road and I dont have any right to come to the road behind my house as these houses (all separate individual houses and not flats)have an association and will not allow any outsider to come there and that too take a dog for a walk as it is a nuisance. I was really surprised and said that the road is a goverment road which is under the local municipal control and it is not their private area or apartment complex with a compound, and said that the road leads and connects various localities behind and is being used by people for years, but they shouted at me and said that they will handover me to the police station (by saying that I am a thief)if I come there again, I finally said to them that they cannot stop me by such threats and said I will use the road do whatever you can and came home
The next day I went but didnt see those men.
I want to know, whether, what these men did is right as per law, can they obstruct any common people from using a government road in the name of associations and can they threaten me that they will handover me to the police station for using the road by framing me that i am a thief
Is what I spoke is right, or what I should have done and what should I do in future if these men again stop me from using the road
Regards
Ravindran
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Will
Hi,
A will was made by father in the year 2013 and divided it amongst his 2 sons and one daughter now he want to revoke it.
But the property which he divided through is will is on the name of his wife and wife is no more.
Now the father want to sale that property but as he created a will her daughter is not giving a NOC to sale it.
So what is the option.
Does after the expiration of wife property automatically goes to kids ? or husband is entitle after the death of wife.
It is not a ancestor property it is made by the husband itself only.