santosh kumari
16 January 2014 at 20:52
Dear expertS
Aa u were infirmed by me that i ,with my family members,and inlaws wereto sit for mutual negotiation on divorce .date was fixed on 13.1.2014
Now
On12.1.2014---my father in law called my uncle n said ...forget all things which happened things.send santoah with me.my aon is not therw.is sailing
My uncle---it is now not possible.as we have sent her with u thrice.lets meet 2maro
On 13.1.2014
Father in law called n said--it is not possible,ur daughter is saying that she want to talk to her husband(its rumour spreaded by him).
From my family no body is supporting me.i may come 2maro
On 14.1.2014
We called him..his no was coming switched off.
We called mediator
He said that-----my father in law has told him that he is going bk to manglore.n will not come for talk
On the other hand side
I called managing director of my husband's company asking him to make me communicate to my husband
Md mailed me ---- we have called ur husband twice n he has choosen not to talk to me
I am badly feeling depressed now.what should i do?
Mediator said that husband will return from sailing in march,2014
nobody has assured me,pathetic situation.i feel like filing case,but famuly saying if i waited for 4 yrs then why cannt next 2 months!
What you sugest me .seek your advice
Advocate Umesh
16 January 2014 at 20:39
Dear friends anyone please help me on my below question?
1) In which court appeal or revision lies from the order of an application u/s. 9a maharashtra amendment CPC and order of an application under o.7 R.11. In Highcourt or District court? pl. provide with Section or Order under CPC with Citations. Applicable for Maharashtra State Only.
rajender
16 January 2014 at 20:05
will the grade pay be protected if a person joins in a lower grade pay and was drawing more grade pay in the earlier scale.( earlier in 15600-7600-39100) and now in (15600-5400-39100).this is a direct recruitment through public service commission in a higher responsibility post in the same deptt. applied through proper channel. also will the basic pay being drawn in the earlier post be protected.
tej
16 January 2014 at 19:59
MY CRIMINAL COMPLAINT IS CLEARLY DISCLOSING THE COMMISSION OF COGNIZABLE OFFENCE BY ACCUSED AGAINST COMPLAINANT
OFFENCE HAS TAKEN PLACE.IT IS CONTINUING OFFENCE.
3. MY COMPLAINT IS DISCLOSING THE MOTIVE OF ACCUSED
4. THE ACTS AND SECTIONS MENTIONED IN THE COMPLAINT ARE STRICTLY APPLICABLE.CAN BE PROVED ON FACE OF RECORD I.E. PRIMA FACIE PROVED.
5. I HAVE GIVEN WRITTEN CRIMINAL COMPLAINT DULY UNDERSIGNED BY ME AND SUBMITTED BY VISITING IN PERSON.
I HAVE VERIFIED IN WRITING THE CONTENTS OF MY CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
CLEARLY AND STOUTLY SPELL OUT THE INGREDIENTS OF A CRIMINAL OFFENCE /COGNIZABLE OFFENCE BY THE ACCUSED AND THE INFORMATION IS SUPPORTED NOT ONLY BY DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE BUT ALSO BY CONCURRENT FINDINGS OF COURT AND THE COURT COMMISSIONER REPORT.
EVEN THEN AFTER AVOIDING TO FILE F.I.R. FOR LAST 5 MONTHS EVEN AFTER HANDING OVER THE MANDATORY PROVISIONS OF154 SUPORTED BY HON.BLE SUPREME COURT POLICE DIDNOT FILED F.I.R.
WHEN COMPLAINT WITH COPY OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT SENT TO HON'BLE HIGHCOURT AND SUPREME COURT POLICE DISPOSED OFF MY CRIMINAL COMPLAINT SAYING THAT THEIR LEGAL CELL ADVISED THEM THAT NO COGNIZABLE OFFENCE CAN BE FRAMED AGAINST BUILDER.HENCE YOUR COMPLAINT IS DISPOSED OFF.
I HAVE PRAYED IN MY CRIMINAL ACTIONS AGAINST BUILDER FOR CHEATING,FRAUD, CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST AND FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 3,4,10,11,5 OF MOFA – 1963, U/S 13 AND IPC SECTION 23,24,25,26,28,30,34,43,44,181,182,191,193,199,200,405,415,417,418,420,423,425,427,463
MY QUERIES ARE AS FOLLOWS
1 WHAT REMEDY IS AVAILABLE WITH ME AFTER SUCH A REFUSAL FROM POLICE?
HOW TO CHALLENGE ADVISE OF LEGAL CELL OF POLICE WHICH CAN BE PROVED FALSE ON FACE OF RECORD BECAUSE OF MY EVIDENCE ON RECORD .
PLEASE GUIDE ME
rajender
16 January 2014 at 19:57
Is NPA ( non practicing allowance) part of salary for the purpose of HRA exemption for income tax calculation.
Anurag Mittal
16 January 2014 at 18:56
Can a Same Lawyer be there for the Accused as well as for a Witness that is summoned by the Complainant in a Criminal Complaint Case, Will it not result in Conflict of Interest?
Anurag Mittal
16 January 2014 at 18:53
Whenever an Act - Statute is Notified in Official Gazetthe , it should be Followed by Subordinate Legislation viz Rules for Implementing the Same . Is there any Citation, Ruling, Directions that Rules are to be Mandatorily Framed for any of the Acts Notified by the Govt?....Rgds...
Anurag Mittal
16 January 2014 at 18:51
Can anyone among the Lawyers Club India Expert community - panel , Share any Citations - Rulings - Practice Directions where in it is made Clear that Accused Cannot Enter Appearance and or Interject and or Intervene at Pre- Summoning Stage when the Complainant Evidence is still to be recorded? Rgds...
anupam sharma
16 January 2014 at 17:55
Can I file application U/s 340 Cr.P.C. for taking appropriate action against Sub Divisional Engineer, State Power Corporation Limited, for tendering false affidavit and registering of FIR U/s 193 IPC.
In a matter pending at Permanent Lok Adalat for exorbitant electricity bill when I was not residing in the house at all, SDEr gave false information to Permanent Lok Adalat by way of evidence on affidavit that I have not paid electricity bill while I have done so and a receipt has been issued by his office in this regard.does the permanent lok addalat have any power in respect to inquiry U/s 340 Crpc.what else can I do?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Slp
A SLP in the Supreme Court was filed regarding obtaining a false certificate and getting a Government job by the candidate  as the High court of Karnataka had cleared out the criminal proceedings against the candidate and declared that the candidate belonged to Scheduled Tribe, based on the fake report given by the ADGP to the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Govt of Karnataka, without taking cognisance ofÂ
1. CRE Cell Report given by the Superintendent of Police who conducted the investigation
2. The School records of the candidates father, which clearly sates that they belong to Other Backward caste and not a Scheduled Tribe.
3. Forensic Lab Report that clearly states that the records have been tampered and the caste mentioned in the Service register of the father belongs to Kaniyar OBC and not a Kaniyan a ST , restricted to Kollegal taluk of Chamarajanagar Dist of Karnataka (earlier belonged to Mysore) Â Â
The above mentioned case was filed by the Govt Of Karnataka and finally verdict was given in favour of the fake candidate.Â
The Government did not file an appeal in  the supreme court . Finally the aggrieved  candidate who was fighting for her rights approached the Supreme Court through SLP now after hearing  the judge has persuaded her lawyer to either withdraw the case or that he would dismiss the case . the reason given for such a decision is that a private party cannot approach the supreme court and that the GO karnataka should approach the Supreme Court.
 But the aggrieved person has filled many cases in the High Court of Karnataka and is also a part and parcel in many of the cases.
 Now my question is thatÂ
1. what may be the reason for the SC Judge to persuade the lawyer to withdraw the case.Â
2. How can we approach the SC with regard to this case as the aggrieved candidate has not been a chance to explain the real fraud that has been obscured till date.Â
3. Can we still believe that there is still justice in the law of court for the poorest of the poor in INdia . I really want to help a real Scheduled Tribe candidate how to reveal all the details of the fraud done by the fraud people. Is only bribe, influence the only criteria to win the cases in the highest Courts and justice and just the true records in the dump yard???????