Babu
02 February 2014 at 18:32
Hi Sir,
we have private limited company, we are 4 directors.me and my brother holding 60% of the company and other 2 directors had 20 & 20 %. So now one of director has getting projects from behalf our company and he didn't give any money to a company.instead he is getting own profits, he was not supporting the company.
Now I would like remove one director.. Another director was supporting him. What are options does I have to remove him. And what are the options oppose the board. Can we remove him with my 60% holding share(2 directors)..
Nilesh Jadhav
02 February 2014 at 16:54
Dear Sir,
I have a flat in Mumbai at Charkop Kandivali west which I used to rent. One of the member of Society Committee has called me and demanded 1 months rent I am getting from Tenant for each year starting from 2012. He has also threatened me that they will not issue NOC and will not allow a new tenant to step in the society.
When I demanded the copy of resolution they are saying that it was passed during one of AGM. The member has asked me to take appointment of the committee to discuss however not giving any appointment. Due to this I am unable to rent my flat to a new tenant and loosing rent. I don't want to pay as already paying 10% non occupancy charges. Can you please advise future steps to avoid harassment by the committee in this regard.
Nilesh Jadhav 9552545169
james
02 February 2014 at 16:37
Hi
I was involed in a criminal case which is over now but the case details are reflecting in a google search engine which is hampering my life now the website people are saying that they will remove or block it only if I get court order to do so now I want to know if I put a case in court is it easy to get court order to do so what are chance in these types of case
nishant arya
02 February 2014 at 16:25
My father and mother owns a flat jointly.now they purchased this flat by gpa and spa from the allotee.
Now my father died a year back.
Does my mother become the sole owner automatically or do the sons have a right in the property?
If the sons have the right then how to make our mother the sole owner?
jitender
02 February 2014 at 14:46
dear members need ur advise on following matter
IS 138 maintainable if the cheque has been issued after closure of account that is the account was already closed in march but the cheque was issued in july ..is it 420 only or 138 is also maintainable"?
any citations would be helpful..
regards
jitender
02 February 2014 at 14:40
dear members i need ur expert advise on a 138 matter my quer is:
that "is 138 case maintainable if cheque has been issued after closure of the account that is the account was already closed in say march and the cheque was issued from that account in july"
any citations would be helpful....
will it be a 420 case only or 138 also can be filed?
Regards
shivanand
02 February 2014 at 14:14
dear sir/madam,
i am shivanand desai my query is above mentioned subject,
The constitution (scheduled tribe) order(second amendment)bill,1991 (karnataka)
in there mentioned given below
A bill to provide for the inclusion of certain tribes in the list of scheduled tribes specified in relation to the state of karnataka
BE it enacted by Parliament in the forty-second year of the Republic of india as follows:
1. (1) This Act may be called the constitution (scheduled tribe) order(second amendment)bill,1991.
(2) It shall be deemed to have come into force on the 19th day of april,1991.
Amendment of the constitution(
scheduled tribes) order,1950.
2. In the scheduled to the constitution (scheduled tribes) order,1950 in "PART VI.--karnataka" in item 38, the following shall be inserted at the end, namely:--
" Naik,Nayak,Beda,Bedar and valmiki".
all these above mater is mentioned in this amendment so please advice me these are all caste are considered as PROSPECTIVE or RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT? in this bill put not also mentioned as a w.e.f 19/04/1991
please sir its very urgent for me
because of in our PTCL case judgment the Hon'ble judge of high court of karnataka telling its retrospective effect its revert back to presidential order 1950.
so as soon as possible give me reply,,please
regards
shivanand
antokingston2005
02 February 2014 at 14:08
Sir, i wrote a exam on 9/12/2012 for Cooperative bank assistants post (3500 post). Everything they conducted the exam with genuine manner. but due to some political pressure they file a case in high court and canceled that recruitment. Now i want to file case against that judgement. is it possible to file writ petition against that judgement?
Annapurna Ramanathan
02 February 2014 at 13:57
Our residential association registered under the "Travancore - Cochin Literary Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955" bans letting flats for "business/ commercial" purposes. See Please see the relevant clause below:
"The apartments are not to be used or caused to be used, either in expressed form or in any disguised form as business/ commercial/ entertainment place and should only be used for residential purpose. And apartment owners are not permitted to let out their premises wholly or partly for short stay to any person/ authority."
Does letting one's flat for Guest House purpose for a company/ organization constitute a 'Business/ commercial' purpose?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Settlement deed
Dear Sir,
I a have a question.
When A (Father) & B (Son) Jointly purchased a property. Subsequently A (Father) made a Settlement Deed in the name of B (Son) giving away his (Father's) Share with a life interest of A's Wife and A's Daughter. A had no ancestral property during his life term.
After A's Death, A's First Son's Son is contemplating to demand a share in the A's Share given to B. A had Four Sons & Two Daughter. All the sons are separate. B was staying with A. First Daughter is married.
Before A expired, he had took on a stamp paper NOC from all his sons and daughters for the Settlement Deed.
Now what is the Position of B? Can a grand son challenge the said Settlement Deed in question ? Whether such claim is sustainable in a court of LAW ?