Lawabiding
05 February 2014 at 16:38
I had bought a property from a reputed builder in 2012,the possession of which was given to me in July last week. I received a property tax on someone else's name and it was from Nov 2011. When I asked the builder he says it was to save my service tax. Now he's forcing me to pay the tax of 9 months(Nov 2011-Jul 2012) for which I had not even stayed/or got possession post which he would get my name changed on the property tax. While buying I was told that am buying a flat in package deal which includes service tax, vat and registration charges. What should I do as am unnecessarily being asked to pay something for which am not responsible.Also the amount is huge which I have to manage with my current emis. There are more than 5 to 6 people who have faced the same situation in my block .Kindly suggest.
rahul lc2
05 February 2014 at 16:31
respected sir or madam.
I am a student of company secretaryship final and also pursuing LLB from Delhi university lc-2 centre.currently i am searching for 15 month cs training .Our CS institute now have permitted the CS student to do there training from law firm also . so now i am confused to weather to do training from a company or from law firm and i also don't now that am i eligible for imparting training from law firms according to there rules because i am in 2nd semester.please help me .
thank you
Atul Kumar
05 February 2014 at 16:12
Dear Sir
When I was unemployed, I appeared in the interview of two central govt. PSUs {let the name of PSU be ‘X’(Miniratna Company) and ‘Y’(Maharatna Company)} and got selected in ‘X’. I had joined ‘X’ with all the basic formalities by signing the bond for serving at least 4 years and if failed to serve, I have to return 03 month salary and many other conditions. ‘X’ has issued my joining letter after some days of joining, but after 20 days of joining I had also got selected in ‘Y’ also. I had decided to join ‘Y’ and resigned from ‘X’. Since without NoC from previous employer I was not supposed to join ‘Y’, so I had decided not to disclosed my previous employer detail in attestation form because I am not having NoC from ‘X’. I had completed one month in ‘Y’. My query is that, if by any means ‘Y’ came to know about my previous employment with ‘X’, can any action against me will be initiated?? Or could I submit NoC of ‘X’ after few months, because ‘X’ will issue NoC when I will pay 03 month salary as per T&C of bond. What will happen if I will submit NoC after any action against me???
SANKET UPADHYAY
05 February 2014 at 15:49
dear sir,
can jmfc entertain the matter regarding to 125(5) ? if yes why? if no why?
Dear All
Please guide the practical procedure and the escape root if any of my question regarding WC policy in GUJRAT
My client is having WC Policy which covered the employee of sub contractors also. A casual worker age 38 years who was drawing wages which comes more than Rs 4,000/- per month died during the work due to the hit of pipe by a vehicle. Client filed the documents and reports to Labour Commissioner. Now the question is
1. Should Company deposit the compensation amount before labour officer as per act with in one month or wait for any communication /
2. Should us wait for insurance company and ask them to pay the money?
3. Any other procedure or escape root which we can do?
Thanks in advance, Please advice on urgent basis.
JMFC ordered to pay or jail to accused offence under section 138 Nego. Ins. Act.. the appellate court decided not to interfere in subordinate court's order. the respondent still have not paid amount in favour of complainant or arrested....which steps will be advisable for complainant ? How to execute the order of subordinate court, which provision in CRPC for execution ?
details of order
Order of JMFC
(1) Respondent to be held as Accused for offense under 138 of NI Act and to be punished with penlty of rs. 5,000/- under provision of section 264 of CR.P.C.
(2) it is ordered to Accused to pay rs. 60,000/- to complainant...and imprisonment for six months if fail to make payment.
Order of Addl. Dist. Judge
1. Appeal of Appellant is rejected
2. order of JMFC held proper
3. no order to cost
Jayant Yadav
05 February 2014 at 15:17
Dear Experts,
My sister is fighting domestic violence case against her husband. In the reply of our petition her husband referred to some transactions into my sister's a/c from his sisters saying that those transactions were loans taken jointly by him and my sister from his sisters. We refuted it during the rejoinder, as the money was in fact return of a previously taken loan. Before the interim argument, the judge asked both the parties to submit a detailed affidavit on earnings, expenditures, assets and liabilities. Now in this affidavit, her husband has mentioned that he has no liability of any kind (secured/unsecured etc.). He has also submitted his bank statement where there has been no transaction to his sisters or large cash withdrawl.
We now have interim arguments coming up.
Can we claim that her husband has committed perjury in claiming the joint loan from his sisters, since he has now mentioned that he has no liabilities. If the loan was taken jointly and has not been paid, it should have been shown in his liability?
Also he has submitted that his parents are dependent on him and he has no brother, while in reality he has a brother and his parents withdraw old age pension by claiming that their sons are not supporting them.
Does this become a ground to initiate a perjury application?
Regards,
Jayant
Now Charge Sheet has been committed to the Session Court, Complainant filed an application 173(8) for further investigation over some issue which was not taken in FIR/Complaint, Can a Session Judge upon her application direct further investigation.
SANKET UPADHYAY
05 February 2014 at 14:44
Dear sir,
In the case of maintenance under 125 of crpc, the JMFC had ordered rs 5000 p.m maintenance. i want to cancel the order under the section of 125(5).I have file the application under 125(5) in jmfc court,who ordered the maintenance.At the time of produce the application before the court, the court wants to judgements of higher courts regarding to jurisdiction of magistrate to hear the application under 125(5). kindly give the citation.
The wording of 125(5) is below.
"On proof that any wife in whose favour an order has been made under
this section is living in
adultery, or that without sufficient reason she refuses to live wit
h her husband, or that they are
living separately by mutual consent, the Magistrate shall cancel the order "
Llb tranining
respected sir or madam.
I am a student of company secretaryship final and also pursuing LLB from Delhi university lc-2 centre.currently i am searching for 15 month cs training .Our CS institute now have permitted the CS student to do there training from law firm also . so now i am confused to weather to do training from a company or from law firm and i also don't now that am i eligible for imparting training from law firms according to there rules because i am in 2nd semester.please help me .
thank you