sk..........
07 February 2014 at 20:47
in civil suit case is dismissed citing limitation as 3 yrs for mandatory injunction now what is option left.
YAGNESH HASMUKH DAVE
07 February 2014 at 20:47
I AM DIRECTOR IN THE PVT LTD COMPANY DURING THE YEAR AY 2011-12 I HAVE TAKEN RS 10 LAC BEING ADVANCE AGAINST PURCHASE OF PROPERTY FOR PVT LTD THE INCOME TAX OFFICER IS TREATING THE SAME AS DEEMED DIVIDEND U/S 2(22)OF IT ACT EVEN THOUGH LEDGER EXTRACT FROM THE PVT LTD CO IS SUBMITTED STATING THE PURPOSE OF PAYMENT MADE TO HIM . WHETHER INCOME TAX OFFICER IS CORRECT OR NOT PL EXPLAIN BRIEFLY
sk..........
07 February 2014 at 20:43
along chief affidavit i have to file documents what is the order rule and section.
ashu
07 February 2014 at 20:38
my father has agreed in writing(on stamp paper attested by notary) with his brother not to take share in properties left by his mother.he belongs from hindu family
anil kumar agarwal
07 February 2014 at 20:27
i submitted a appeal in state administrative tribunal in the month of sept.2013 but nothing happen expect giving dates so as per advise of my lawyer i submitted withdrawal application and tribunal rejected my appeal as withdrawn .later on i filled appeal in high court on hearning someone filled a application under 1/10 for making party and pleaded that i can not filled writ in highcourt because i had withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a fresh.kindly guide with rulling
respected experts,
the lokadalat case has been compromised on dated 23-nov-2013.
before the lokadalat the parties compromised with the conditions were written on the (100 rs) bond paper.
1.the plaintiffs are agreed to pay 28 lakhs to the defendants for compromise and they initially paid 5 lakhs to the defendants.
remaining amount will be paid after the lokadalat compromise.
2. the defendants are also agreed and they are compromised in the lokadalat on the above said date.
3.the amount perticulars are not mentioned in the lokadalat petition.
4.now the plaintiffs not binding to the agreement condition they are now saying that after the mutation on the revenue records then we will pay the remaining amount to you.
5.original bond paper with the mediators only xerox copy along with me.
6.they (PLAINTIFFS) approached the MRO with the ORDER COPY OF LOKADALAT FOR MUTATION.
Q1.AT PRESENT STAGE CAN WE GIVE LEGAL NOTICE TO THE MRO WITH XEROX COPY OF AGREEMENT FOR NOT TO MUTATE THE RECORDS.
Q2.BASED ON THIS AGREEMENT CAN APPROACH COURT FOR APPEAL.
THANK YOU SIR.
Dear Sir,
I, husband won RCR one year before. also sent a Reg ad letter to wife to join matrimonial. and also filed RD in court against order.
Now at the same time she filed a 125 case in village which Court ordered to pay amt maint. to wife I filed u/s 127 in the same court which is going on still working and also filed appeal in upper court which is also going on still working
My question is that can I file DV case now. Its already past one year and I have a ground for she not yet returned till one year ( year crossed).
Please suggest me should I go for DV or wait result of Appeal and 127 case.
10 years married, two children with her.
Thanks,
sachin
07 February 2014 at 19:52
Dear Sir / Madam,
A real estate company wants to tie up with different consumer brands to give discounts to its customers who have purchased its flats and in return the real estate company shall promote those brands through its websites and advertisements. What should be the clauses that should be captured in the term sheet?
Regards,
Sachin
Amit
07 February 2014 at 19:42
My father's business is that of transportation of goods by road on contract basis, one of our parties has delayed at about more than 6 months to clear our outstanding dues & now, instead of paying interest charge for such delay, rather they are demanding to deduct some percentage of due payment on the point stating that we had charged more than reasonable in the bills, eventhough the same bills had been beforehand verified & passed by there own executive.
Now, the problem is that my father thinks that t takes along period to recover such amount through legal proceedings.
So, my question is that, is there any legal way available to us through which the same due amount could be recovered at its earliest???
Please help me out....
Neighbour occupied land
my neighbour occupied my land 15 yrs back
now i want to file suit.
should i file suit for mandatory injunction
what is the limitation period,
b what way can i recover my land.