Nikhil Agarwal
14 February 2014 at 08:11
sir, what if the licensee does not abide by the clauses of the agreement and misbehaves with the licensor
V.N.K. MENON
14 February 2014 at 08:10
A complaint was filed u/s 405/406/420 IPC for beach of trust in Magistrate’s court which was dismissed by not taking into account vital facts by the magistrate. As such, a revision was preferred before Sessions u/s 397 CrPC. Sessions dismissed the revision petition again without taking vital factors and documents into account. Thus there was travesty of justice. It pertinent to point out that Opposite Party has tainted course and conduct and is money-powered.
The query is:
-------------
In view of bar on a second revision u/s 397(3), is there any remedy available to approach High Court? Has the road came to a dead-end and no remedy is available?
Present Position:
-----------------
In fact, an appeal was preferred u/s 482 CrPC in Delhi High Court where opposite party, i.e. accused, argued that a second revision is not maintainable u/s 397(3) CrPC.
High Court has given time and listed the matter in March 2014. Considered view of experts shall be helpful to enable me to take a prudent and feasible stand.
Naveen
14 February 2014 at 07:00
Hi Experts
Day before yesterday I lost blank estamp papers worth Rs78000/- during transit. Is there any possibality of getting a duplicate of those. I have the challans of purchase with me.
Kapil Tiwari
14 February 2014 at 01:08
An individual, Mr.X, sold a plot of vacant land and in order to claim exemption of long term capital gains tax, invested Rs.50 lakhs in 54EC tax saving bonds of NHAI and REC. The bonds have a lock-in period of 3 years. Within 3 years, the bonds cannot be transferred or converted or sold in order to claim the tax exemption.
Now, if Mr.X expires within one year of investing in the 3-year bonds, will the tax exemption still be available, provided the bonds are not transferred or converted or sold? Should the bonds continue to remain in the name of Mr.X for additional 2 years (even after death) to complete the 3-year lock-in period? Is this legally allowed?
Or, do the bonds have to be transferred/transmitted to the nominee of Mr.X (after his death) and the nominee does not transfer/convert/sell the bonds until the 3-year lock-in period is complete?
The worry is that transfer/transmission of the 3-year 54EC bonds to the nominee within one year may amount to not holding the bonds for the compulsory 3 years and hence capital gains tax will have to be paid.
Kindly advise what is the best course of action. Thanks.
Member (Account Deleted)
14 February 2014 at 01:03
Dear Sirs
I am planning to buy a property form X- person who had received this property form her Husband in the form of " Release deed without consideration "
also I understood from source that Person X- is the second wife of the re leaser
My question is that : is it OK and safe to buy such Property ? if not then what are the consequences will be there probably ?
Please advice and suggest.
My Name is Patve, I stay in Thane,
My contact no. is 9892528263
Din Dayal
13 February 2014 at 21:28
A recent contract, by oversight states that dispute under the contract will be resolved under old Act of 1940 , though it should have referred to 1996 Act . I hope that 1996 Act should apply in this contract automatically . Will there be any problem? I am a novice and therefore seek guidance . pl help.Regards.
Raghu
13 February 2014 at 21:26
Hi,
My wife has been selected as a Civil Asst Surgeon and just delivered a baby before the orders are issued with Govt of AP. We heard that she is not eligible for the maternity leave as the baby was born before the appointment order was given. She is facing lot of problem as she has to travel with one week baby and she also had casaerian due to which she is facing lot of stress. Please help us to avail this maternity benefit.
Thank you,
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Stay petition
I have to file petition [in person]to stay proceedings till pendency of appeal ,
what is the u/o rule ,section to be mentioned pl advice.