M.K.Ganatra
06 March 2014 at 17:16
Claim settled by insurance co, but amt. is low to the tune of 5 crores approx. What is time limit for approaching the case under Arbitration and conciliation Act.
rajnish tiwari
06 March 2014 at 16:19
Dear Mr Kalaiselvan........
Sir
You are an experienced lawyer and are talking sense. Donot you think consent for compounding by fraud is not a valid consent in law. During composition of 494 wife clearly deposed before court she is not guilty. she has stated on oath before family judge that the child was born dead and was born from legal husband. New development shows she lied. Donot you think in your opinion, the compounding was null and void ab initio? This will be very helpful.
GREENKAIJ
06 March 2014 at 16:11
Case file against the Retired Government Servants.
please suggest it's procedure.
Gopal Ranjan Panigrahi
06 March 2014 at 16:01
Respected Sir,
A person has a landed property in his individual name.Construct office premises over the same and leases it to Bank through his individual name.
Now later he gets an PAN Card in name of HUF and submits it to lessee bank saying the TAX be deducted on HUF PAN CARD.
Property is in Individual name .Registered lease deed of such premises has already been leased by such individual with Bank.
Now can Bank make payment on the newly given HUF PAN Card . Individual says his individual PAN through other sources has already crossed the tax exemption limit. Can the Bank deduct thru HUF pan .
If Yes, what are the means. If no the reasons for the same.
Thanks & Regards
e form
06 March 2014 at 15:53
Res
I Want to Case file Against the Government Servant? Criminal Case
It is compulsory take prior permission of District Magistrate, for It?
The government servant's post is Medical OFficer.
Nandkishor Maroti Ambade
06 March 2014 at 15:50
Whether agricultural land in Maharashtra belonging to ST community owner can be exchanged with the land owned by other person (non tribal) from the perspective of land consolidation. The land proposed to be exchanged is 2 fields away from the land owned by tribal owner.
Tusker man
06 March 2014 at 15:43
I recently bought an apartment and have registered it. My builder had sent a demand letter for service tax on one time maintenance advance.
Recently, I read an article http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-12-10/mumbai/45033316_1_service-tax-flat-buyers-home-buyers which says that the service tax has been removed.
Guidance please if I have to pay my builder or not?
abcdefg
06 March 2014 at 15:38
A hindu widow XYZ has two sons ajay and vijay.XYZ has some property alloted to her by final decree of court.XYZ is illiterate. XYZ is living with ajay.On one day,in night,when XYZ was sleeping,ajay has taken XYZ's left hand thumb impressions on blank bond paper.After two years of this incident,XYZ died.Now,ajay has written text matter on blank bond paper that "After XYZ's death, XYZ is willing to give her entire property to Ajay and nothing to vijay".Also by offering some money(bribe) to notary and two witnesses,Ajay has notarized the above prepared bond.Now ajay has produced this bond(as XYZ's will) in court claiming XYZ's entire property.Apart from this bond,there is no will of XYZ made in sub registrar office or made in court.Will bond produced by Ajay be treated as valid will by court? Or is there any legal way to prove that bond is invalid or illegal?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
About the contempt
sir,
Suit for deceleration and possession filed by the plaintiff against the defendant. Defendant appeared in the said suit and filed w.s. than after matter was posted for arguments. After hearing both the parties at length. court rejected the injunction application of the plaintiff and held that there is no document produced by the plaintiff to show the title and possession over the property. Actually defendant constructing the house over disputed property so the court held in its order. there is no adverse evidence to show to the court that the defendant constructing the house on the land of plaintiff, therefore the application of injunction was came to be rejected. being aggrieved by that order he preferred an appeal. session court granted ad interim injunction to the plaintiff/appellant because at that day defendant were unable to appear before the session court. While giving the ad interim injunction session court imposed certain condition that, appellant never asked adjournment for the hearing of appeal or never delay the matter. after the said order, defendants appeared before the session court and were ready for the hearing but at that day appellant did not want to argue the matter so that he filed an application under o.26,r.9 of c.p.c. for the appoint of the commissioner. defendants were ready for the hearing of that application on same day but appellant filed a report that, they want do hearing in the light of some judgments. so that court granted the adjournment of the very next day, at that day application was heard and decided by the session court on same day, than after court asked for the hearing of the injunction application but he submitted that he want to challenge the said order before the high court so adjournment was granted, matter was adjourned. appellant filed an S.C.A. before the high court, mean while he produced a report for the adjournment in the session court, saying that, he has preferred an appeal before the high court against the order of the session court. than after matter was adjourned so that defendants advocate was unable to appear before the session court because his family member was no more. so court has fixed another date in which defendants adv and the adv were present but intentionally he did not come at right time so that court has decided to hear another matter. meanwhile there was not much time for the hearing so court has adjourn the court without asking the report. but defendant adv urged before the court that sir, please hear me so defendant concluded his argument and argument of the appellant is still left. Now i want to ask that, after reading the event of the case before the session court weather ad interim relief which was granted in favor of the appellant is still survive or vacated? moreover if status quo is granted regarding the property than, defendant can move certain things from the suit property if such things caused lost to the such as "Senting" which is used to to fill the slab on house. or if it is done than it amount to contempt or not? just give me brief detail.