NEERAJ SHARMA
13 March 2014 at 07:09
i donno why complainant has made me witness in a case where i dont know either the complainant or accused , now court issued a summon directing me to bring documents of my property on the date of hearing. ..
what option i do have? can summoning order be challenged , can i file an appeal against the summoning order by magistral court ?
sanjeev kumar
13 March 2014 at 05:13
Sir,
I have filed a case of permanent and mandatory injunction. After a year I withdraw it with the permission to file a fresh case of same cause of action under order23 rule1.
Defendant contention is that the case is still hit by order 2 rule 2.
What is correct situation.
prem ranjan
13 March 2014 at 01:23
Respected Sir,
Sub:-Request for clarification regarding Joining time pay and Transfer allowance-regarding.
With due respect, it is submitted that I , the undersigned, Joined in Central Excise Department on 03/06/2013 as a Inspector of Central Excise, Tirupati, Andhara Pradesh and at present, I am continuing in this department. My case is as under.
Before joining Central Excise Department, I have already rendered about five years continuous Govt. service in two other different departments i.e. (1) in Income Tax Department as a Tax Assistant with grade pay of Rs.2400/- from 18/01/2008 to September 2011( almost 3 years and eight months completed) and (2) in Railway Board (Ministry of Railway) as a Assistant with Grade Pay of Rs. 4600/- from September 2011 to 29/05/2013 ( almost 1 year 9 months completed). In both these departments, I have been selected through SSC CGL and both the Departments have accepted my Technical Resignation and relieved accordingly.
Further, it is submitted that I have applied for joining time pay as I have relieved from Railway Board on 29.05.2013 and joined the Central Excise Department on 03/06/2013. During this transit period (i.e. four days from 30/05/2013 to 02/06/2013) I have not got salary from Railway Board.
In connection with the above, Central Excise Department (Administrative Officer) told me that as I have not completed two years continuous service in the previous department (i.e Raiway Board (Ministry of Railway), hence I am not eligible for joining time pay.
Further, it is also submitted that I have also applied for Transfer TA from Delhi to Tirupati on relieving from the Railway Board (Ministry of Railways). But again the Department has rejected my Transfer TA claim on the ground that I have not completed two years of continuous Service in the earlier Department. Hence, as per rules read with SR.114 under GIM .FOM. No. F3(3) Estt. IV/56 dated 3rd March,1958 and their corrigendum of even number dated 23.05.1958, I have not been declared quasi permanent/ permanent. Hence , the Transfer TA claim is rejected.
Now my humble request for clarification is on the following points.
1. Whether am I eligible for Joining time and joining time pay in the present Department?
2. Whether am I eligible for Transfer TA claim?
Kindly give me your valuable views and clarification on the above matter. In this regard, I am very upset with my department decision. Somebody told me about your esteemed publication that on seeking help from Swamy publications necessary clarification shall be given promptly.
Kindly consider my plea for your valuable views and clarification.
Thanking you.
Yours faithfully
(Prem Ranjan)
Inspector, Central Excise
O/O the Commissioner of Central Excise,
Tirupati Commissionerate, West Church Compound,
Amaravati Nagar, Tirupati-517502
Ph. No. 08886145848/07428962005
Email:- premranjan1982@gmail.com
uday galbale
13 March 2014 at 01:10
Respected expert, my friend has a pan shop beside a road and behind that shop the gram panchayat constructed shopping complexes. My friend has applied to seek the complex on rent to him but the panchayat did acted that upon or not given a single letter to him therefore he issued legal notices for twice by his counsel but the panchayat did not pay heed towards them. And now the panchayat going to allot that complex to the rich person as per their accord. Therefore please suggest me what should i do now? And what legal remedy is available with him?
Amrutha
12 March 2014 at 23:15
Hello,
Can we take legal action against family (father's mother)if they are denying us property?
This property was given to my grandmother by my late grandfather and it's now on her name. Do we have a right to claim?
Will a legal notice move things forward?
yuviraj singh
12 March 2014 at 22:13
Respected sir...complainant ne apne ghar par hui chori ki complaint police ke pass likhvai orr fIR main directly ak person par chori ka iljam lgaea. uss person ne police ko recovery ke roop main curency de di orr baki ak orr third person ko apna partner bta kar usko bhi case main fsa dia jabh ke nah toh complaintant ne uske khilaf report likhvai thi orr na hi koi uskr khilaf evidence thi. sirf police ne uski family ko dra dhamka ke unse paise lie orr unh paise ko recovery ke roop main dikha dia jabh ke complaintant ki chori clothes ki hui thi.court main police ne dono ke khilaf court main charge sheet pesh ki hai....kya dusre person ke khilaf court main charges lagne par rok lag sakti hai..
niky......
12 March 2014 at 22:11
This is a rent evac case and i am the tenants son. The case is going between my widow mother and landlord.
The gas connection is in name of my late father, and i want to change it to my name.
Is there an issue in doing so or is it not allowed when a court case is going on for the rented room?
Puneet
12 March 2014 at 20:55
Respected Sir/Madam,
Requesting you to suggest on below points.
1) In pagdi system, can a tenant give the flat on rent to a 3rd party?
2) If yes, can the land lord claim his share in this rent? if yes then how much amount needs to be shared with land lord & will tenant get proper receipt for this payment done to landlord.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Atm debit card
Is it right to use of atm debit card by wife after death of husband which was handed over by her husband during heart attack.
There was no nominee(wife name also) in his bank account.
But they were operating the bank locker as a joint account.