friend
30 March 2014 at 22:19
Sir,
my wife has filed for divorce in her city, mediation failed,i have to file objections.i will be filing rcr in my place. i know that she is working in one of the top 3 Indian IT mnc's in Bangalore. i do not have the salary slip.
but every month the companies upload the EPF contribution made by that company along with the names of the employee in the EPF website which is a public document and can be downloaded from EPF website section called Establishment search(remittance).
i have that(latest) document with her name in it and have a video of her entering the company(i can have more videos as well).
i want to prove that she is working.
with the above info how can i prove it.what else is required.can i file RTI to the company and get her salary slip ,which is a listed company.
with above epf document can i ask the court to send a notice to the company or epf organization to get her salary details.
kindly help me in this.
sasha
30 March 2014 at 22:17
Hi!
Thanx everybody!
Won 127crpc.
our stage has reached mediation.
but here also I am facing problem .
my husband wants all my property but if I am asking security for me n my children in shape of money he is refusing .
and he wants FIR to b quashed I.e 498a
If I say that tell me how much monthly allowance he will give he is not ready to disclose it . And does not want anything in writing .
its just that he wants cases to b closed property on his name n I fear tmmrow he might run away. Like he did bfore but this time his handsfull.
wat shud I do?
Want cases to b closed .
Vijay Kumar
30 March 2014 at 22:16
Just read Mr.Sureshbabu's article, wherein it has been suggested
"A official circular should be issued to all police stations directing the personnel to give due respect to the Advocates who come to police station for professional work."
1. What kind of work an Advocate could have at a Police Station?
2. Here, in our State Punjab, we Advocate never go to police Station.It is the duty of the client to provide to the Advocate copy of FIR or other documents.
DHIRENDRA KUMAR
30 March 2014 at 21:24
Sir,
I am working as an Assistant in AFHQ in PB-2. I have got my first increment but the further increment are withheld as I have not qualified the typing test. Sir, I have 'Digital Tremor' i.e. 'shaking of hand' which is a hereditary disease so I am unable to qualify the test at the requisite speed. I have earlier also been disqualified in the medical examination of the Air Force due to my disease of Digital Tremor. Can I get exemption or more time to complete the test on medical ground. Sir please help me.
heena
30 March 2014 at 19:54
Fact of the case an Fir is registered u/s 385,506 of ipc in Bangalore Karnataka chargesheet also submitted the same.in Bangalore.As per prosecution story offence firstly committed in out of India (Nepal)and was continue in Nagpur Maharashtra.CAUSE OF ACTION (all evidence)are available out of India and in India (Nagpur)prosecution has also submitted political certificate U/s 188 cr.p.c and Bangalore court has took cognizance of chargesheet trial is still pending.
In case of ajay agarwal VS union of India Apex court said "if part of offence commited in India then we can not say offence commited out of India and section 188 CrPC not applicable"
My question Is
1- prosecution is right to choose Bangalore instead of Nagpur...?
2-Can lower court transfer case from Bangalore to Nagpur court
3-if yes then police report(chargesheet) would be valid in Nagpur court means Bangalore police investigation report
or magistrate will conduct a fresh investigation from Nagpur Police
5- Bangalore court will discharge the accused
plz send me any judgment regarding the same.
thank you
sujeet patil
30 March 2014 at 19:51
THE CHEQUE HAS BEEN DEPOSITED BY COMPLAINANT AFTER 20 YEARS OF CLOSING OF ACCOUNT.WHETHER THE AGE OF CHEQUE CAN BE TAKEN AS DEFENCE? ANY CASE LAWS?
s c Mann
30 March 2014 at 19:51
25 plaintiffs of a residential complex and developer (defendant)finalized consent terms through the mediator and it attained finality by a consent decree. Plaintiffs were paid 50% hardship compensation (for delay in execution of the project by the developer) at the time of signing of consent terms and 50% was to be released by the mediator after 01 year without recourse to defendant but provided clauses under consent terms were not breached by either party.Plaintiffs did not form the ad-hoc committee for one year and were inquired by mediator about the reasons thereof, pending balance compensation to be disbursed to plaintiffs. While 13 plaintiffs have given an undertaking that they indemnify the developer and will continue to pay legitimate maintenance charges (their balance compensation has been released with consent of developer given to the mediator; other 12 plaintiffs along with with cleared 13 plaintiffs have now together formed the ad-hoc committee under the aegis of bungalow owners'association, without intimation to the developer and the mediator, and that too after 15 months from the date of consent terms, and have expressed in writing to the mediator and developer that they have now established the ad-hoc committee and thus achieved full compliance and balance compensation should be releases within 10 days. May I request your opinion if the adhoc committee so constituted is void and inconsistent? Can this ad-hoc committee be recognized by the developer and mediator? Should the mediator refer the matter to court for proper constitution/composition of ad-hoc committee? Should the duties and responsibilities of ad-hoc committee be spelt out by the mediator or the court as per established norms? Plaintiffs over the last 15 months have shown no responsibilities towards smooth running of the complex - do not pay maintenance on time and do not abide by safety & security laid down procedures. Developer is running the complex and developing the balance area and troubled by above nuisance by plaintiffs. Is the bungalow owners association required to be registered by them? Request advise course of action by the developer. Thank you.
subhash chandra
30 March 2014 at 18:20
Sir
I have requested for posting at Jaipur
accordingly DOPT O.M. but my department has refused to implement it. Application & O.M.
attached. Please guide me what wold me next step so Department follow it.
To,
The Director General of Meteorology
India Meteorological Department
Mausam Bhawan Loadi Road
New Delhi -11003
Subject:- Request for Posting at Jaipur as AM-II
(Reference: - O.M. F.NO. 28034/9/2009-Estt. (A) Govt. of India Ministry of personnel, Public Grievances & pensions ( DOP &T ) North Block, New Delhi. Dated 30th Sept. 2009. Subject: - Posting of husband & wife at the same station.)
Sir,
With reference to the office order cited above subject, I have been promoted to the post of AM-II and posted at DGM'S office, New Delhi.
In this connection I am to state that my wife is working in Rajasthan Govt. in Education Department as a teacher and posted near Sanganer Jaipur (Govt.Upper Primary School,Thala.) Posting certificate enclosed as Annexure -I.
My teenaged children are studying at Jaipur and needs my patronage; therefore my posting at Jaipur may kindly be considered sympathetically.
Furthermore, DOPT O.M. F.NO.28034/9/2009 Esst. (A)dated 30th Sept. 2009. Para 4 section(vii) which envisage that-
4(vii) Where one spouse is employed under Central Govt. and other spouse is enployed under the state Govt.:-
"The spouse employed under the Central Govt. may apply to the competent authority and the competent authority may post the said officer to the station OR if there is no post in the station to the state where the other spouse is posted." Enclosed as Annexure- II.
Under the above provision your requested kindly consider my case of posting at Jaipur.
Thanking you.
Yours Faithfully.
Date:-
(Subhash Chandra)
(SA)
MC Jaipur (Rajasthan)
Annexure: As Stated
Annexure- II
Posting of husband and wife – Same station – DOPT Order
F.NO.28034/9/2009-Estt.(A)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions
(Department of Personnel and Training)
North Block, New Delhi, Dated the 30th Sept2009.
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject: Posting of husband and wife at the same station
In view of the utmost importance attached to the enhancement of women’s status in all walks of life and to enable them to lead a normal family life as also to ensure the education and welfare of the children, guidelines were issued by DOP&T in O.M No. 28034/7/86-Estt.(A) dated 3.4.86 and No.28034/2/97-Estt.(A) dated 12.6.97 for posting of husband and wife who are in Government service, at the same station. Department had on 23.8.2004 issued instructions to all Mins. / Deptts. to follow the above guidelines in letter and spirit.
2. In the context of the need to make concerted efforts to increase representation of women in Central Government jobs, these guidelines have been reviewed to see whether the instructions could be made mandatory. It has been decided that when both spouses are in same Central Service or working in same Deptt. and if posts are available, they may mandatorily be posted at the same station. It is also necessary to make the provisions at Paras 3(iv) and (vi) of the O.M. dated 3.4.86 stronger as it is not always necessary that the service to which the spouse with longer service belongs has adequate number of posts and posting to the nearest station by either of the Department may become necessary.
3. On the basis of the 6th CPC Report, Govt. servants have already been allowed the facility of Child Care Leave which is admissible till the children attain 18 years of age. On similar lines, provisions of O.M. dated 12.6.97 have been amended.
4. The consolidated guidelines will now be as follows:
(i) Where the spouses belong to the same All India Service or two of the All India Services, namely lAS, IPS and Indian Forest Service (Group ‘A’);
The spouse may be transferred to the same cadre by providing for a cadre transfer of one spouse to the Cadre of the other spouse, on the request of the member of service subject to the member of service not being posted under this process to his/her home cadre. Postings within the Cadre will, of course, fall within the purview of the State Govt.
(ii) Where one spouse belongs to one of the All India Services and the other spouse belongs’ to one of the Central Services:-
The cadre controlling authority of the Central Service may post the officer to the station or if there is no post in that station, to the State where the other spouse belonging to the All India service is posted.
(iii) Where the spouses belong to the same Central Service:
The Cadre controlling authority may post the spouses to the same station.
(iv) Where the spouse belongs to one Central Service and the other spouse belongs to another Central Service:-
The spouse with the longer service at a station may apply to his/her appropriate cadre controlling authority and the said authority may post the said officer to the station or if there is no post in that station to the nearest station where the post exists. In case that authority, after consideration of the request, is not in a position to accede to the request, on the basis of non-availability of vacant post, the spouse with lesser service may apply to the appropriate cadre authority accordingly, and that authority will consider such requests for posting the said officer to the station or if there is no post in that station to the nearest station where the post exists.
(v) Where one spouse belongs to an All India Service and the other spouse belongs to a Public Sector Undertaking:
The spouse employed under the Public Sector Undertaking may apply to the competent authority and said authority may post the said officer to the station, or if there is no post under the PSU in that station, to the State where the other spouse is posted.
(vi) Where one spouse belongs to a Central Service and the other spouse belongs to a PSU:-
The spouse employed under the PSU ‘may apply to the competent authority and the said authority may post the officer to the station or if there is no post under the PSU in that station, to the station nearest to the station where the other spouse is posted. If, however, the request cannot be granted because the PSU has no post in the said station, then the spouse belonging to the Central Service may apply to the appropriate cadre controlling authority and the said authority may post the said officer to the station or if there is no post in that station, to the station nearest to the station where the spouse employed under PSU is posted.
(vii) Where one spouse is employed under the Central Govt. and the other spouse is employed under the state Govt.:-
The spouse employed under the Central Govt. may apply to the competent authority and the competent authority may post the said officer to the station or if there is no post in that station to the State where the other spouse is posted.
(viii) ”The husband & wife, if working in the same Department and if the required level of post is available, should invariably be posted together in order to enable them to lead a normal family life and look after the welfare of their children especially till the children attain 18 years of age. This will not apply on appointment under the central Staffing Scheme. Where only wife is a Govt. servant, the above concessions would be applicable to the Govt. servant.
5. Complaints are sometimes received that even if posts are available in the station of posting of the spouse, the administrative authorities do not accommodate the employees citing administrative reasons. In all such cases, the cadre controlling authority should strive to post the employee at the station of the spouse and in case of inability to do so, specific reasons, therefor, may be communicated to the employee.
6. Although, normal channels of representations/complaints redressal mechanism exist in the Min. / Deptts., added safeguards to prevent noncompliance may be provided by ensuring that the complaints against nonadherence to the instructions are be decided by the authorities at least one level above the authorities which took the original decision when they are below the level of secretary to the Govt. of India/Head of the PSU concerned and all such representations are considered and disposed off in time bound manner.
7. Hindi version will follow.
(C.B.Paliwal)
Joint Secretary to the Govt. of India
MUKUL SHARMA
30 March 2014 at 18:17
I want to start a boys hostel.Is there any Law regarding it's registration?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Ll.b. + ?
Sir,
I would like to know, after doing LL.B. ,doing M.B.A. in which field branch is having more demand?
Human Resource (HR) or Marketing or information Technology (IT) or Any other Field?
Regards