ajit
02 April 2014 at 09:49
Respected Sirs,
I have sold my used car through an advertisement in Feb.2014 to an individual. I have signed Form No.28,29 and 30 and handed over to him. Also I have obtained his assurance on Rs.100 stamp paper that he will transfter the car in his name and that he will be responsible for all the dues,taxes and other legal obligations from the date of purchase. Now two months are over and he is still not giving me the copy of his RC book as a proof that he has transferred the car in his name. In this senario,I
always worry that in case, if any thing wrong happens to the car, can it affect me ? What more can i do rather than keep on requesting the purchaser to show me the copy of his new RC book ? Your expert answer from legal point will help to releive my tension to great extent. Thanks in advance. Regards.
INDIAN LADY
02 April 2014 at 06:41
Respected Experts , I hv engaged lawyer for 125 andv 498a for which I hv paid full fee to him even 498a is yetnot started and waiting for charge sheet. His pending amt with me is Rs 7000 against the total amt of Rs 33000 for both the cases and he will take rest of 7000 as the chargesheet will be submitted in 498a an then he wull present in the court from my side after taking his full fee . So for these two cases I can not change this lawyer as full fee is paid. With ur advise I have engaged a new lawyer for execution of interim in 125. Now my two more cases r pending revision of interim and Hma13 filed by my husband for which I still I hv not engaged any lawyer as my earlier lawyer is asking very heavy fee and allI in advance and for which I m not in position to pay all at once . Now my query is if I engaged a other lawyer for 2 new suits who can cooperate me in taking the less fee in installments then will it effect on my earlier cases of 125 and 498a as both the lawyers will work with different thoughts . In 498a first one have written the complaint and written the application in 125 . Can the new layer catch the idea of first lawyer from copies of 498a and 125. Can I appear in the court in HMA13 and CRR without the councel on first hearing so that I wilp get the time to decide the lawyer for new cases. One more thing Hma 24 and 26 are sepatate cases or is it the part of reply of HMA 13. Kindly advise.
Regards to all
Member (Account Deleted)
02 April 2014 at 01:51
Sir,
With due honour this is to inform that the T.A.Bills of mine of the year 2010, while I served as DI/S(PE),Siliguri , yet to be released. It was informed to me that the Bills were resubmitted to the Office of the Commissioner of School Education, W.B. as per Memo of DI/S(PE),Siliguri , No. 57/PE/G ; dt - 07/02/2012.
Now, when I requested the present Official, he clearly told me that he has nothing to do regarding that matter.
Pls, advise me what should I do to get my long pending TA Bills.
With regards,
Ashesh Bhowmik
9475902801
DIPTIRANJAN PATRA
02 April 2014 at 01:28
in election different things like boat,animal,vehicles etc are requisition by order of Collector & DM as per power conferred on them U/S 160 of RP ACT 1951. in the said act in section 167 it provides that whoever disobey the order issued U/S 160 of RP Act shall liable to be punished for imprisonment of up to one year. so in case of any violation detected who shall issue the warrant of arrest under the said penal provision.
armaan kapoor
02 April 2014 at 00:45
Dear sir,
The original agreement that I am relying upon in a civil court wherein I am plaintiff. is misplaced. I hav only one witness to prove my agreement. Pls guide me as to what I can do to prove my case.
DINESH KUMAR
02 April 2014 at 00:41
once return filed before passing the final assessment order in persuance of notice under section 142(1) & 148 can A.O IVOKE SECTION 144 R.W.S 147 OF IT ACT, 1961 TELLING HE HAS NO TIME TO VERIFY THE CLAIM OF LOSS CLAIMED IN ROI FILED ALRAEDY.
IF HE IVOKE 144 & PASS THE ASSESSMENT ORDER WITH OUT CONSIDERING ROI FILED IS WRIT IS MAINTABLE IN HIGH COURT. THE ASSESSMENT YEAR IN QUESTION IS 2009-10.
EVEN AFTER FILING RETURN HE PASS THE FINAL ORDER U/S 144 THAT TOO WITH OUT GIVING SHOW CAUSE NOTICE AND OPPURTUNITY TO EXPLAIN. HE ALSO NOT CONSIDERED ALL THE EVIDENCE , SUBMISSIONS GIVEN TO HIM.
IS WRIT IN HIGH COURT IS MAINTABLE. PLS GIVE ME OPINION.
Manmohan singh
01 April 2014 at 23:40
Dear sir,
Will is written in favor of A B and C
Absolute property is bequeathed to A (mother). After her death it is bequeathed absolutely to B and C. As per the will B and C will be absolute owner of the property after the death of A.(END of Will)
Background information
B died in the life time of A but survived Testater.
This may or may not case of Joint tenancy each one has 100 % share in the property and after the the death of B, C gets the 100% .
Heirs of B does not get the property as nothing is mentioned about them in the will.
Law of death in instacy (death without will) is not applicable here where property is passed on to widow of deceased.
Question: Does C takes whole of the property after the death of A. Any reasons.
Thank you in advance
Mihir Kumar Maitra
01 April 2014 at 23:03
Dear Sir,
I (age 66 years) live in Dwarka, New Delhi with my wife in my own flat. My son lives in NOIDA with his wife in a rented accommodation with their permanent address as shown ours (Dwarka). I am fearing that my son's Father in Law is toying with the idea of filing a 498a with other DV charges against us in Asansol, West Bengal. My question is can he file charges in Asansol when we all are living in Delhi and if so can the case be transferred to Delhi.
Kindly give your advice on what preventive measures we can take and please keep this confidential.
I remain
Mihir Kumar Maitra
rimi
01 April 2014 at 22:49
r they no longer admissable as evidence. the recordings r quite long bt i hv not changed thm in any way...
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Cancellation of the anticipatory bail
Accused of under Section 498A IPC file a false affidavit before a high court along with his false and incorrect application for anticipatory bail which was granted to him.
After some time in the course of investigations, it has transpired that was found to be untrue. Now court trial get started. The prosecution is now likely to inform the court about this revelation, seeking cancellation of the bail granted to accused in the 498A case.
( also he hide from High court that his first & second anticipatory bail was rejected by session court )
what is the procedure to cancel bail ???