anupam sharma
10 April 2014 at 19:33
The purchases done by me a bottle of oregano which had paper slip pasted against MRP which depicted Rs. 85/- and another paper slip pasted against Net Wt stated 30 GMS and bill was purportedly issued by departmental store. On returning home when inadvertently the paper slips were removed it was revealed that actual MRP written on the bottle of oregano was Rs. 35/-(inclusive of all taxes) and Net Wt. was actually 10 Grams only while I was charged RS. 75/- for 30 grams of oregano . A legal notice was sent to both departmental store and the manufacturer of oregano but a reply was received by departmental store that such slips were pasted by the manufacturer. Also, the legal notice to manufacturer was returned with remark that the company (manufacturer) does not exist. What remedy do I have? Can I write a complaint to office of S.S.P./ Legal Meteorology department/Food Supplies or Drugs Department?
sachin
10 April 2014 at 19:03
Dear Sir / Madam,
Our company having it's registered office in Mumbai is the receipient of certain services, whereas the service provider of the said services is a company registered in Delhi.
The place of execution of the service providers agreement, the governing laws and jurisdiction shall be Mumbai or Delhi?
Regards,
Sachin
Respected Sir's
We as builders developed our property in 2007 by adding 3 floors to the existing building which was constructed in 1968. There are about 20 residential and commercial tenants in the 2 wings. After construction of 3 additional floors there were 6 new tenaments constructed. All these 6 new tenaments were sold on ownership basis. Also from out of the 20 old tenants 2 residential and 2 commercial tenants were converted to ownership. The conveyance of the Land was given to society after formation of society.
The stamp duty was fully paid on all the tenaments which were sold on ownership. However the rest of the tenaments are still with the builder. They are neither sold nor conveyed to the society.
Collector of stamps has issued a notice to society about 10 times in last one year saying that the stamp duty is not properly paid on the related conveyance document.This notice has been sent to the society asking for a payment of Rs 54 Lacs.
As per a notification issued in Globus Magazine it says that the Inspector General of stamps of Maharashtra will issue a circular saying that NO stamp duty is payable if Landowners/ Builder retains some flats and commercial tenaments after developing their properties.This was also informed to the High court by the Additional government pleader.The lawyer said that retaining some commercial and residential premises cannot be treated as conveyance as envesaged in Bombay Stamp Act 1956 and therefore NO stamp duty can be levied.
All the documents confirming that the unsold premises are with the builder, the share certificates issued by the society in the name of builder, the rent receipts issued by the builder/Owner to the tenants are submitted to the collector of stamps Kurla. But he is still not satisfied with the correspondance and is still issuing notice for payment.
Please advice as to what the society and the builder should do to get the notices cancelled. The Collector is asking the society to come to Pune and clarify the matter but what if even after going to Pune he does not understand the situation
Please advice.
Thanking you in advance
abdul
10 April 2014 at 18:43
Sir,
i have certain questions in my mind
1) Is commissioner of oath a gazatte rank
2) can a commissioner of oath use green ink for signature
3) can a commissioner of oath attest copies such as school certificates and attesting photo in documents such as examination hall ticket etc
thanks
with regards
abdul
10 April 2014 at 18:37
Sir,
i have certain questions in my mind
1) Is commissioner of oath a gazatte rank
2) can a commissioner of oath use green ink for signature
3) can a commissioner of oath attest copies such as school certificates and attesting photo in documents such as examination hall ticket etc
thanks
with regards
Rohan
10 April 2014 at 18:16
This is regarding the L&L Agreement register under MRC. The Licensees is not ready to vacate the premises even after the L&L has been expired. I have given the Application with all documents to the Competent Authority yesterday as well. Now I need to understand how much time it will required to get the possession? & what will be the process follow by Competent Authority?
sanjay
10 April 2014 at 18:15
if deemed conveynce deed is taken by society deleting memebers from society actula memeber of sociery is 16 but at the time of taling deemede conveynce society declre th ddr that thereis only 12 memebers as 3rd floor of society is illegle they r not showing 3rd floor is there in society even they are issued share cerificate and all this thing to third floor flat owner after deemed conveynce order of ddr what wiil be third floor flat owners position ? that society has not disclosed to ddr that there is total 16 members are also society as third floor is illegle please advice
Satish Purushotham
10 April 2014 at 18:04
My grand father and his two younger brothers,while dividing properties in the year 1946,set aside a vacant land in the common schedule belonging to all the three brothers.Later on from the three branches contributed equally and constructed a building in the vacant land in the year 1955.In the year 1956 my grand father expired.My grand father had two daughters with his first wife,with his second wife he had two sons and a daughter.All were married subsequently.My grand father first wife daughters died in the year 2005 and 2010,they are having sons and daughters,all majors and married,will they get share in the above property.
k n nagaraj
10 April 2014 at 17:59
please let me know the references of annulment of marriage on the grounds of mental illness of the spouse.(Supreem Court judgements on the subj)
ase history.
Proposal brought by MIL stating her daughter is normal, and has answered in affirmative for all quiries on the ability of the bride to perform normal duties of a wife.
The bride is divorced was known but it was not known that the first husband also brouht out mental illness and non consumation as the grounds for divorce.
The MIL still insists that her daughter is perfectly normal.
Psychiatrist agree that the bride is not normal and requires treatment but wont put in papers.
Psychologist says IQ o k but behaviour not normal. Unable to conduct tests because of non co-operatin of the patient.
Behaviour totatly abnormal. Fails to react to situation.spouse sent back on the second day after mariiage and referred to psyciatrist and arranged for medicine and consultation.
Police hesitate to take criminal complaint.
Please advise action.
commutation of pension
Medical,examination in case of commutation of pension for person whose inquiry is decided after one year of retiremnt is necessary???state the rule plz