DINAKARAN
10 May 2014 at 10:41
X a patient approaches an optometrist for determining the percentage of vision in his eyes.
The optometrist after examination says that X has seventy percent of vision in both the eyes.
X takes a second opinion with another optometrist and learns that he has only sixty percent of vision in both the eyes and therefore he is considered as a person with disability under the persons with disabilities act. X files a case against the first optometrist with the help of your learning analyse this problem legally.
Regards
J.Dinakaran
9444151658
lsingh
10 May 2014 at 10:32
I am purchasing an under construction flat in noida. and one of the documents asked is agreemet to sell. do I need to make this agreement from noida only?? and who can I go to ask for the help on this.
Thanks
lucky
Member (Account Deleted)
10 May 2014 at 07:09
My brother got married 4 months back. Gril's mother, often threatens my brother saying she will take back her daughter to her house and uses filthy language for small issues. Girl doesnt want to live with my mom (our mom is widowed and sick, cant live alone. I am married and living out of country).
A month back, girl left his house with her mother, taking all her things. My brother was also upset and didnt stop her. Her mom called and asked why the marriage was not consummated and my brother replied that wife didn't stay continuously even for 1 month in the house and there were issues in-between because of her and her mom. Another issue they raised is her daughter will not stay with my mom and they want divorce.
Now received legal notice stating that
1. my brother left her at her house saying he will pick her up after 2 days. (which is a lie)
2. marriage is not consummated and he has to resume his duty as husband immediately. (they didnt talk to family members but said they want only divorce. their agenda is to threaten my brother for a separate family without my mom)
My question is
Should we reply to legal notice
1. denying 1st and for second saying that girl can come any time to her matrimonial home, but my mom will also stay with her son. Also her mom should not interfere or control/influence her daughter (which my brother says is a mental torture to him and thats his actual problem).
2. If they dont accept for this, can we ask whether they agree for mcd because my brother says it cannot go on like this. Again, for small issues, he fears girl might leave listening to her mom.
The lawyer he consulted advised that If he doesnt want to stay together, its better to file for divorce first from his side because girl now stays in different state and if she files there, we have go for hearing to other state. Also lawyer suggests that filing divorce will help against any criminal case if they file in future.
Please help. We thought it would be better to ask them for mutual divorce if they dont agree to his terms.
jibin
10 May 2014 at 00:30
sir we would like to start a nurses union (registered under trade union),our staff strength is 500 , we are working in an autonomous organisation under national importance (jipmer puducherry)so please advice us how to get affliation and recognition under trade union act 1926 and please tell the things to be done for formulating a union
raghavendra
09 May 2014 at 22:26
sir,
suit for partition has been filed,along with the plaint we have filed application to appoint the plaintiff No-1 as a guardian of plaintiff No-2 ,here plaintiff No-2 is mentally retired lady and plaintiff No- 1 is aunty of plaintiff No-2, now my question- is court dispose off the appointment of guaradian application first or along with the otherwise issue case will go one.
thanking you
jagjit
09 May 2014 at 20:31
SIR,
MY WIFE HAS FILED CrPC 125 CASE AGAINST ME IN WHICH COURT HAS ORDER 2500/- INTERIM MY WIFE HAS FILED THE REVISION FOR THAT IN RESPECT OF THAT I WANT TO KNOW THE FOLLOWING,
1. SUMMONING SERVICE HAS NOT BEEN DONE BUT HER COUNCIL INFORMED THE COURT THAT I KNOW ABOUT THE CASE AND COURT HAS ACCEPTED THE SERVICE OF SUMMON, THOUGH I AM A DEFENSE EMPLOYEE NO SUMMON HAS BEEN SENT TO MY COMMANDING OFFICER, IS IT CORRECT.
2. SHE FILED LOT OF LITIGATION AND I AM IN A FINANCIAL DEBT CAN I APPEAR IN PERSON.I KNOW THAT I AM NOT A LAWYER BUT I CAN REPRESENT MY SELF AGAINST HER FALSE ALLEGATION.
3. WHO IS HAVING BURDEN OF PROOF OF MY SALARY, MY WIFE OR ME.
4. WHAT HAPPEN IF CRIMINAL REVISION
DISMISSED AND IN MY FAVOR. THE INTERIM WILL STOP OR CONTINUE.
5. KINDLY GUIDE ME.IF YOU CAN TELL ME SOME REFERENCE CASE I WILL BE THANK FUL TO U. WITH REGARDS.
5.
JAGANNATH RAO PARINAM
09 May 2014 at 20:29
My MIL had been geting family pension since last 20 years and the same has been credited to her bank a/c with SBI NEW NALLAKUNTA(HYD)For last three months she has received family pension of Rs 13182/=plus DAR Rs 678/=but in the month of April the bank credited only Rs 5636/=On enquiry from the bank they simply said the calculation id correct.We have referred the matter to the bank but no positive response.Under these conditions ,who are the persons to whom we can refer our grievance and get the correct family pension at the earliest.
Regards,
pjrao
VINEET KUMAR
09 May 2014 at 20:04
RESPECTED MEMBERS/EXPERTS
After lodgeing three false criminal cases against me and all my family member under sections 498 A, 506, 420, 409, again 420 etc. my wife who is under influence of her press reporter uncle who is very influential person and literally a dalal of hiegher police officials i.e S.P and D.S.P made One more false complaint to police on 28/12/2013 alleging that my brother who is working in chandigarh along with five other persons tried to kill her brother (my brother in law/sala) and also tried to kidnap isika (my seven year daughter who is in custody of my In-Laws). The time and date of the incident as given by them is 3.20 pm. The fact that the same time my brother was in chandigarh which is 150 km away from my hometown i.e the place of incident and at 2.45 he has withdrwan the money from ATM in chandigarh. Hence police had to cancel the above said complaint as the ATM footage and cell locations were in our favor. Now, my mother in Law who is a widow along with the said press reporter has complaint to Human rights commission , women commission that police has done wrong by cancelling the complaint and she even provided six false affedavits of various persons which says that thogh they dont recognise the assailiants but confirms the occurance of the said event.
Further, they have filed one criminal complaint against my brother, my father, and police in the local court for the same complaint which is cancelled by the police. In mediation of High court chandigarh my In Laws are asking for Rs.35 Lacs for settlement and divorce otherwise they will keep on giving false complaints.
please advise
1. Whether FIR can be lodged by police now under pressure from human rights commission/woman rights commission?
2. Whether court can order the lodge police to file FIR in the criminal complaint filed by them.
3. Can we do something against my in laws for giveing false complaints again and again?
4. Can we file criminal complaint/defamation at chandigarh where my brother resides or the same should be filed where the complaint has been given?
5. Please advise how to deal with such miscreanent i.e the press reporter as whole police and civil administration is under his influence. please give your valuable advise. we shall ever remain in debt for your valuable advise. please help us.
prakash
09 May 2014 at 17:24
Dear sir
girl studying in final yr Engineering She belongs to S.T NAYAKA,boy belongs to Brahmin,one month back they got registered marriage,now both the family have agreed and arranged the marriage,boy is working tin MNC company.after the marriage the girl will get govt benefits in job or not what is the law says for inter-caste marriage,kindly do the needful.
regards
prakash
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Section 13(1)(d)(ii)(iii) of pc act 1988
R sir i put a complaint against a clerk for demanding of bribe. Due to pending Inquiry the department withheld the clerk promotion but now i got the information through RTI that school Principal issue a false certificate of regarding
" no inquiry pending" . School principle knows the matter that inquiry is pending against this clerk but Principal is in the favor of clerk so he issue him a false certificate that no inquiry is lying pending against that clerk . so with the help of this false certificate department gave him promotion .
So please tell me that this is the offence falls under section 13(i)(d)(ii)(iii) of PC Act 1988 because the school principal abuse his position to reward the benefit of promotion to that clerk by giving him false certificate.