Dhirender Wadhwa
11 July 2014 at 01:18
the concerned property is in Ghaziabad u.p. the said property was bought by the seller in 1957, the original sale deed is missing. now the grandson and his widow mother are selling the property. they only have house tax receipts and gda approved map (map contains the name of original buyer.. the h.tax receipts were transferred in the name of buyers son and now in the name of his widow.... there are 5 other legal alive heirs to the property...
1. can the originals be traced from registry office??
2. are house tax and gda map enough proof of ownership??
3. If all seven alive heirs sign the sale deed, claiming that there is no one else.. is it advisable to buy the property..
kindly help
Dhirender Wadhwa
10 July 2014 at 23:44
my bank has been deducting tds on the fd and other interest in my saving account but no intimation or certificate was issued.. also no entry of such deduction reflects in passbook..
now I came to know of the deductions for the past 4 years.. can I claim these tds in my current itr. kindly help
KULKARNI KAUSTUBH PRAVIN
10 July 2014 at 23:26
one of my friend made delay to file application before S.D.O for objection on mutation entry the application is rejected the delay is more than 7 yr.Any idea about what is the maximum period for delay condonation.
Jasim
10 July 2014 at 23:18
I appeared in the recruitment test of a maharatna psu. I qualified the written test and appeared for interview. According to the recruitment advertisement I was eligible for multiple disciplines and by virtue of my performance in written test I was deemed eligible to be interviewed for 4 disciplines. there were 2 interview boards, first one interviewed me for only 1 discipline (Production) and awarded me 8 marks out of 15. second one interviewed me for the remaining three disciplines (Mechanical, Drilling & Cementing) and awarded me 10 marks out of 15. in the second board seperate marks for seperate disciplines were not awarded, they awarded a single interview score which was to be used for all the three disciplines. other than that, 25 marks were for qualifying exam. if a candidate had the requisite qualification he was awarded 20 marks out of 25 and if he had the next in line qualification(PG) he was awarded 25 marks out of 25. I came to know all these via RTI applications. I was not selected after interview. I filed an RTI application to know my marks. I got 88 out of 150 in written, 8 marks in first interview and 10 marks in second interview and i got 20 marks for my qualifying degree. As explained in the reply to the RTI application marks scored in written test were first converted to out of 60 and then added to interview marks and qualifying exam marks to arrive at the final merit list. moreover, 9 marks were fixed to be minimum qualifying marks in the interview. according to this information I was ineligible to be considered for the discipline covered by first interview board and I was eligible for the remaining three disciplines covered by second interview board. my total score for the disciplines covered by second interview board comes out to be (88*60/150)+10+20 = 65.2 out of hundred. and the cutoff marks for final selection for my category were 64.8, 64.8 & 66.6 for Mechanical, Drilling & Cementing disciplines respectively. according to this information I got marks that were more than the cutoff marks in Mechanical and Drilling disciplines. but the reply to my RTI application states that "board 2 found him fit for Cementing discipline only". I filed another RTI application, asking them, among other things, to list various criteria that were considered while deeming a candidate fit for a certain discipline, as any such clause wasn't mentioned in the original recruitment advertisement. moreover I asked them whether they took into account the candidate's preferences (that were asked in while applying to the recruitment) while deeming a candidate fit for a ceratin discipline. my preferences were in the order Mechanical, Production, Cementing, Drilling. I recieved a response from the CPIO to my application but he didn't answer my question in which I asked to list the criteria that were considered while deeming a candidate fit for a certain discipline, neither did he explained whether a candidate's preferences were taken into account while doing so. in fact he didn't even mention the question in his response. my question is how should I proceed further. I am not well versed in what the law says on such instances, but what I understand from common sense is that when a single interview score was awarded for all three disciplines then both merit and preferences should have been taken into account to prepare the final merit list (like UPSC does). And if such a rule (which allows an interviewer to randomly find a candidate fit for a discipline) random existed they should have mentioned in the recruitment advertisement. instead of doing that, the interviewers found me fit only for Cementing without any particular reason and when I enquired for the same they didn't provide me with an answer. not only that, they completely ignored my preferences of disciplines. I can understand the fact that there is some subjectivity as far as interviews are concerned, but that subjectivity ceases to exist after the marks for interview are awarded. after that only the total score and the preferences of candidates are used to prepare merit lists. so please help me figure out what I shall do next. thank you
niky......
10 July 2014 at 23:16
Hello,
I am a tenant(defendant) and the owner(plaintiff) has filed a evac case. My query is not exactly related to that case but to know if i can file a Municipality complaint towards the slabs that are falling from terrace of building and a iron gate at lobby constructed at staircase by owner which can case a major hurdle in case of emergency situations to carry a patient. I requested the owner to remove that gate but he is not listening, hence wanted to complaint in Municipality. But since a court case is going on, is there any restriction that i cannot raise this complaint or can i do it?
Please advise. Thank you.
Avishek
10 July 2014 at 22:57
i want to know from the esteemed expert regarding an issue relating to one of my client, being the father of an errant son and want a solution . The father has been facing torture by his well-to-do son from a considerable time and being disgusted with the behavior of his son, he now takes a decision that he will make a declaration snapping all his relationship with his errant son .He also want that such declaration should have a lawful effect so that the father can say by means of that declaration that he (the errant son ) is no more his son from the date of declaration.
now my query before the expert is
1. whether the father can make such declaration by way of an affidavit before the lD. judicial magistrate?
2. if so what will be its effect in law especially with regard to the movable and immovable property of the father?
3 Whether the father can debar the son from inheriting the movable and immovable property of his title on the basis of such declaration on affidavit before the Ld. judicial magistrate?
WHATSAPP 91-8075113965
10 July 2014 at 22:35
sirs,
i would like to know whether lease agreement has to be registered as per some new amendmend ?
whether a third party can obtain the certified copy of the regd lease agreement from the registrar, with out the knowledge of either party, on payment of fixed copy expenses ?
what informations are required to file a copy application in the registrar"s office ?
thanking you, sirs ...
Rajesh N
10 July 2014 at 22:11
My neighbor has started Hotel in his residence.
The entire lane is residential zone and I wish to know what legal actions can be taken against the development.
Also suggest is it permissible to start hotel trade in residential zone.
Waiting for your valid reply
Thanks,
Raj.
Anonymous
10 July 2014 at 21:50
I appeared in the recruitment test of a maharatna psu. I qualified the written test and appeared for interview. According to the recruitment advertisement I was eligible for multiple disciplines and by virtue of my performance in written test I was deemed eligible to be interviewed for 4 disciplines.
there were 2 interview boards, first one interviewed me for only 1 discipline (Production) and awarded me 8 marks out of 15. second one interviewed me for the remaining three disciplines (Mechanical, Drilling & Cementing) and awarded me 10 marks out of 15. in the second board seperate marks for seperate disciplines were not awarded, they awarded a single interview score which was to be used for all the three disciplines.
other than that, 25 marks were for qualifying exam. if a candidate had the requisite qualification he was awarded 20 marks out of 25 and if he had the next in line qualification(PG) he was awarded 25 marks out of 25. I came to know all these via RTI applications.
I was not selected after interview. I filed an RTI application to know my marks. I got 88 out of 150 in written, 8 marks in first interview and 10 marks in second interview and i got 20 marks for my qualifying degree.
As explained in the reply to the RTI application marks scored in written test were first converted to out of 60 and then added to interview marks and qualifying exam marks to arrive at the final merit list.
moreover, 9 marks were fixed to be minimum qualifying marks in the interview.
according to this information I was ineligible to be considered for the discipline covered by first interview board and I was eligible for the remaining three disciplines covered by second interview board.
my total score for the disciplines covered by second interview board comes out to be (88*60�150)+10+20 = 65.2 out of hundred.
and the cutoff marks for final selection for my category were 64.8, 64.8 & 66.6 for Mechanical, Drilling & Cementing disciplines respectively.
according to this information I got marks that were more than the cutoff marks in Mechanical and Drilling disciplines. but the reply to my RTI application states that "board 2 found him fit for Cementing discipline only".
I filed another RTI application, asking them, among other things, to list various criteria that were considered while deeming a candidate fit for a certain discipline, as any such clause wasn't mentioned in the original recruitment advertisement. moreover I asked them whether they took into account the candidate's preferences (that were asked in while applying to the recruitment) while deeming a candidate fit for a ceratin discipline.
my preferences were in the order Mechanical, Production, Cementing, Drilling.
I recieved a response from the CPIO to my application but he didn't answer my question in which I asked to list the criteria that were considered while deeming a candidate fit for a certain discipline, neither did he explained whether a candidate's preferences were taken into account while doing so. in fact he didn't even mention the question in his response.
my question is how should I proceed further. I am not well versed in what the law says on such instances, but what I understand from common sense is that when a single interview score was awarded for all three disciplines then both merit and preferences should have been taken into account to prepare the final merit list (like UPSC does). And if such a rule (which allows an interviewer to randomly find a candidate fit for a discipline) random existed they should have mentioned in the recruitment advertisement.
instead of doing that, the interviewers found me fit only for Cementing without any particular reason and when I enquired for the same they didn't provide me with an answer.
not only that, they completely ignored my preferences of disciplines. I can understand the fact that there is some subjectivity as far as interviews are concerned, but that subjectivity ceases to exist after the marks for interview are awarded. after that only the total score and the preferences of candidates are used to prepare merit lists.
so please help me figure out what I shall do next. thank you
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Validity of gift deed
A got into agreement with B to sell his property. The agreement states if B does not pay in time, A is at liberty to deal with his property as he wishes. Can A do a valid Gift deed when B is not coming forward to pay the sale consideration by offering return of earnest amount.