Achhru Kumar Singla
18 July 2014 at 23:12
Bank has charged excess interest than the contracted rate. on submission of claim of excess interest charged, bank replied that panel interest is charged in the account but no statement of the account indicates that any panel interest charged in the account. As per the guidelines of the RBI, penal interest to be shown separately in the statement of accounts if charged.
Kindly advice to get the refund of the excess interest charged by the Bank
subhash yadav
18 July 2014 at 23:07
sir iam a delhi govt hospital staff nurse.suppose iam doing duty in casualty and there is any qurel between staff and patients attendents.and patients relatives beat us on duty ..this situation who lodge the fir individual ya hospital authority....because a chief doctor is alwayas on duty as CMO.
Achhru Kumar Singla
18 July 2014 at 22:49
Dear Sir,
A partnership firm of 3 partners (me, now expired partner and third partner) account was declared NPA by Bank and outstanding was 20 lacs. The business of the partnership was shut down due to dispute with the third partner. The bank auctioned the property of the son of the third partner who was guarantor in the account for Rs. 10 lacs in July 2011 and the sales proceeds of the property kept in sundry account because confirmation of sale was stayed by the DRT. Even we move to DRT for stay against our properties mortgaged in the Bank and deposited 10 lacs in Sundry Account in June 2011 as per the directions of the DRT.
As per the directions of DRT on 18/03/2013, me and son of the expired partner signed the MOU with Bank for settlement of the account 2/3rd of the total agreed amount of Rs. 30 lacs. A minute of meetings are drafted and signed by the Bank and us for our share and Bank agreed to settle the account individually and the only condition of the OTS was to deposit Rs. 10 lacs before 26/03/2014 which we have fulfilled and deposited accordingly nothing was mentioned about the share of the third partner as already Rs. 10 lacs was lying in sundry account with Bank. Now the Bank said that the OTS is rescinded as the third partner has not agreed to deposit his share. On the basis of the Bank's refusal, DRT dismissed our SA and also confirm the sale of the property of the son of the third partner i.e. dismissed the SA of the son of the third partner. Now the bank has filled the case of recovery of Rs. 40 lacs. kindly advise on the matter copy of the minutes of meetings is attached
mohan sehgal
18 July 2014 at 22:47
we are shifting our place of final removal of finished goods(Premises)to our other registered premises.....what is the procedure to follow for transfering the stock of finished goods to the new premises ??
mohan sehgal
18 July 2014 at 22:03
we have got three premises registered under
central excise due to working space problems....however,we remove the final finished goods from one unit only after paying full appropriate excise duty....whether we have to mention R.C. no. of all the three units or the R.C.No.of the removal unit only on the sale -invoice....
Member (Account Deleted)
18 July 2014 at 21:57
i have to join a public sector org.....my both parent are deceased and old house is in custody of the bank for non payment of the home loan.........org ask for permanent address but i have only current address
asylumdropout
18 July 2014 at 20:53
Greetings everybody !
Please suggest the best possible course of action for "A" considering the following FIR's and timeline of events.
PEOPLE INVOLVED:
A : 30 years old doctor,businessman, owner of colleges and only son.
B: 42 years, Ex-Librarian of A's college.
C: 39 years, Ex-Office staff of A's college. Where B & C are very old friends.
TIMELINE OF FIRs
31-8-2013 : FIR Lodged : By A's mother against C : Location A's residence: charges 381, 384, 504, 506 : Reason: C threatened A's mother of dire consequences and was trying to extort hefty sum of money. He also vandalized her office and stole money from there.
2-9-2013: FIR Lodged: By Mr.B against A : charges 307, 504 and 201 : Location A's residence: Reason explained: B went to ask for salary at A's home and A shot B under irritation with his licensed revolver hitting him on the shoulder & waist. He claimed that he was saved by the people present, while A absconded.
25-9-2013: FIR Lodged u/s 156(3): By A's wife against B & C and their aides: Charges: 323, 506, 384 : Location A's residence: Reason: on 2-9-2013 B & C attacked A at A's residence and also attacked his mother and his wife while she was pregnant. reason : money extortion and they were irked due to the FIR lodged by A's mother on 31-8-2013
23-2-2014: FIR Lodged : By A's mother against B & C : Charges: 395, 391 : Location A's college premises: Reason: B & C with 5 or 6 aides attacked her and destroyed the files and looted the premises. Initially the FIR was sponged under the political influence of B & C but it got restored by the order of DIG and B & C are now absconding.
ACTUAL STORY IN BRIEF:
1- A lives alone with his mother and wife. His parents (Father senior officer, posted in a different state of India) received money extortion calls by anonymous people. Upon suspecting B & C's hands who were working at A's own college, A paid the salary and dismissed them from the job. irked upon the disclosure of their money extortion plans C surfaced fearlessly, vandalizing the residence, stealing money and threatening A's mother in his absence. First FIR was lodged against C on 31-8-2013. (See timeline of FIR)
2- Being provoked by the FIR B & C attacked the residence of A again, injuring A, A's wife and mother.(Medical reports available). "A" sustained fracture in fingers and muscle rupture of serious nature. But when B was going to shoot A in head, A grabbed the gun of B, twisting his hand, shooting B on his waist and shoulder. C,his aides again attacked A and took B to the hospital. (The person admitting B in hospital is B's childhood friend, name available on hospital admittance slip). FIR lodged on 2-9-2013. (Investigations going on, no chargesheet submitted)
3- Police was supporting B & C so they denied lodging cross FIR. but it was lodged u/s 156(3) later by the wife of A. A went to the doctors and got partial treatment but the surgery was denied by the doctors as A was absconding arrest.
4- B & C along with their aides now attacked the college premises firing shots at the furniture etc again looting money from there and destroying the files. FIR lodged on 23-2-2014. Investigation going on, no chargesheet submitted)
PLEASE SUGGEST THE BEST COURSE OF ACTION ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS.
1- If A surrenders so that the doctors may perform the surgery. Then on what grounds could he get a Bail, and what could be the estimated time frame? (the case is of UP)
2-Could the case lodged by "B" be quashed on the basis of loopholes and contradictory statements in the FIR of B and pre-existence of an FIR against B's friend expecting such events? (see below for loopholes)
3-Could A deny the shooting in bail and raise a question about the sustainability of the case by B who had exploited 307 for monetary gains, on the grounds such as-* A never had any licensed weapon * No arms, blood or any evidence were recovered by the police suggesting such events * No presence of witnesses other than B himself * No depth of the wounds were measured in the medical report of B suggesting the bullets could have be planted surgically * A doesn't have any motive to fight with B as such would blemish his reputed image in the society * B planted the case to suppress the existing FIR against C as C was booked under money extortion 381, 384, 504, 506 ?
4- B & C have demanded a sum of more than 50 lakhs to compromise and dissolve the case via I.O.. Therefore, A doesn't want to compromise as such criminals as B & C would surface up again in future with bigger demands and what A had lost in this incidence is greater than any money.
INCONSISTENCY, LOOPHOLES AND CONTRADICTORY STATEMENTS IN THE FIR LODGED BY "B"on 2-9-2013 are as follows:
1- A is aggrieved because A's mother lodged the FIR first against C (Friend of B) suspecting exactly what happened.
2- B said that A shot at him with his licensed revolver while A never had any license or firearm. (easily verifiable by court, police or anybody)
3- B claimed that he went alone and bystanders helped him - The event happened inside A's house, so who were the bystanders? If he went alone without any ill-intentions then how come his childhood friend got him admitted in hospital? (Name present on admittance slip)
4- Police never recovered any blood, firearm, shells or any witness supporting B's claim other than B himself.
5- B had already collected his salary and signed the salary slip.
6- Suppose A really wanted to kill B: Then A is a doctor who knows the fatal parts. A had a 315 bore rifle in his father's room. A was a national level shooter. B was inside the house of A all alone(As per B). What are the chances of survival in such scenario? A single head shot and the job is done..
Medical report says the wounds of B are of 0.3 X 0.3 cm suggesting 0.22 bore bullets. (The depth was never measured by probing).
SUGGESTIONS ARE WELCOME.
Rupinderpal Singh
18 July 2014 at 20:50
Respected forum experts,
Myself Rupinderpal and have passed +2 this year with non med stream. I wanted to ask that i am from punjab and does it matter to study law from a private university or college ? Please help me , and let me know is it beneficial to study law from a private university or college or a from a govt. college of law . I am thinking about to get admission in LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY ,JALANDHAR and this private university is introducing law this year only . I am from punjab and please refer me some best colleges to study law.
Thank you
Reply soon
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Bank officers misrepresentation and inhumane activity
can FIR to be lodged against the bankers for misrepresentation and inhumane activities done by them. Due to their activity my father is serious and permanent on bed
kindly advice