rajesh
30 August 2014 at 07:20
I am a non agriculturist and bought a plot say 400 squ mtr. for residential purpose. a landowner prepared layout for his agricultural land wherein the said piece of plot is located and got sanctioned lay out from town planning authority, Maharashtra. The said Agricultural Land is Located in residential zone in Development Plan of Corporation. Without seeking non-agriculture permission from collector, he sold one of the plot to me after infrastructural development (internal, roads, boundary marks, open space etc. ).Whether provisions of sect 63 will be attracted and whether collector can act under sect.84c for forfeiting the land. If I do approach collector he may imposed conditions which would be difficult to fulfill.
I wish to seek your expertise opinion to protect my interest and authority.
Ganapth
29 August 2014 at 23:43
Dear Sir
I am 65 year old women, i got a house through registered will from my father both my parents are dead, i am sole beneficiary of the property located at valavanur village, villupuram district tamilnadu
i had applied to valavanur panchayat office, Executive officer and president to change my name in property Tax along with application and required fees i had attched my both parents death certificate, registered will copy, Encubrence certificate,and a legal opinion from Notary public lawyer ( legal opinion states i am the sole benificiary of the property )
All documents for property tax name change is very clear
but the panchayat office president & E.O not changing the name in property tax and Tax payment not paid for three years since my parents death,
through third party i came to know, person in panchayat office want to buy the property at very low cost, hence they are not allowing to name change in property tax
please advie me
1) to which higher official i should report district collector,Thasldar etc, about these corrupt people
2) what other possible option i had to solve this problem with less time frame.
thank you
Visalakshi
Bapugouda
29 August 2014 at 22:41
Sec 125 of Crpc.
‘A’ and ‘B’ got married as per muslim customs , and they had three female children , after some years the “A” husband dead living behind his wife “B” and his children . until his death ,”A” himself and his wife and children were residing with his joint family (father, mother, brothers). After death of his son “A”, the parents of the “A” throughout the “B” and her children without providing any means or maintenance , Under these circumstances,
*What are the legal benefits available to “B” widow and her children?
* Whether “B” widow and her children can claim maintenance against her father in law and grand father?
* Can they seek relief of partition in the joint family property?
Kindly answer with authorities if possible.
Vijay
29 August 2014 at 22:15
Dear Members,
I would like to know if The Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2013 which was passed by the Rajya Sabha on 26/08/2013 the law of the land.
Can the said Insertion of new sections 13C under The Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2013 be used as a ground for dissolution of marriage and obtain a divorce decree.
Thanking You,
Vijay
Anand Anand
29 August 2014 at 22:15
Dear experts,my friend fathers has two wives.after the death of 1st wife he married second wife.1st wife has 4 female and 1 male and secondd wife has one male i.e my friend.my query is can my friend claim or is he entitle for the ancestral property as he being the son of second wife???as per hindu law of succession act.
Bapugouda
29 August 2014 at 22:12
Respected sir/madam
Please find solutions to the following questions.
“A” and “B” are muslims by birth , both them married ,lived as a husband and wife for one year , mean while husband “A” went to America , after promising that he will get his wife “B” too America after settling over their . After some months the father of “A” has sent registered post and paper publication to wife ”B” that his son has given TALAK to her by internet.
This wife “B” challenged this issuance of TALAK by filing Original suit in Family court as TALAK was not communicated her by her husband “A” any time.
During the pendency of the original suit “A” husband came to India and not appeared before family court but married another woman “C” and went back to America.
Then wife ”B” filed original suit before same family court praying to declare the second marriage of “A” husband with “C” is void or irregular till pending disposal of first original suit and “B” wife obtained stay for travelling of second wife “C” as a wife of “A” to consume the marriage till disposal of first suit.
Please note and reply
* Whether suit in such nature is maintainable?
* What are the ingredients of second marriage?
*Whether TI is to be continued?
*What will be the fate of first of wife if suit is not maintainable? And second wife “C” joined “A” in America?
Please answer with authority if possible.
Amit
29 August 2014 at 21:08
a Ltd company deducted Rs. 3.5 lacs from my client (being a transporter), on account of goods lost in transit(diff of actual claim and amount recd. from the insurers). The deduction was agreed and accepted by my client in writing.
The business afterward continued between my client & the said Ltd company. After almost 6 months, the Ltd company handed over three consignments of diff. location to my client for delivery. My client detained two consignments and sent a letter demanding interest of Rs. 5 lacs on delayed payments of earlier period and release of Rs. 3.5 lacs deducted on account of insurance, though my client has already accepted in writing. But now my client says that the letter was given by him under pressure to get the overdue payment released from the said Ltd company.
The Ltd company makes up mind to lodge an FIR u/s 407 IPC.
Can anyone suggest the merits and demerits of my client & the said Ltd company in the present case.
My client on the back of its L.R. printed certain terms & conditions of their transport contract, which includes that they are entitled to lien on the goods to recover the outstanding payments/dues. Does this clause legally entitle my client to detain the goods.
So, Please Please Please....help me & guide me with prompt responses;
Thanks in Advance....
MUKUL SHARMA
29 August 2014 at 20:36
Kay warranty used goods purchase karne par bhi lagu hoti ha.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Section 63 of bombay tenancy and agricultural act
I converted my only Agricultural Land situated in Maharashtra into Non-Agricultural and sold the all the plots. I do not have any Agricultural Land in my name or in name of my siblings, now I want to buy Agricultural Land in Maharashtra.
My query is:-
Can I buy Agricultural Land?
can I buy within 2-3 years?
is section 63 of Bombay Tenancy and Agriculture Act will barred me from buying it.
Please guide me with your expertise opinion.