sathya
09 October 2014 at 15:31
Sir, my husband owns a flat for which he is paying loan every month and two land properties in Chennai. I know the area names but don't knw exact address if property. I filed dvc mc and hmop for his adultery. Can u pls guide me how to get the property details and help me in getting my share in this property.
Member (Account Deleted)
09 October 2014 at 14:42
hello experts....would u send me name or citation of relevant case law for where father's consent under sec.361 of ipc obtained by misrepresentation and by fraud......
vijay
09 October 2014 at 14:18
R/sir,
My neighbour had fild a civil case against me on the basis of a sale deed executed on behalf of a fabricated and false gpa to grab my plot (in above sale deed he has mentioned my plot as rasta while his rasta on other road) but I have won the case because I have registry of my said plot and no rasta in aksh sizra etc.
Actual owner of his plot has also filed a civil case against him for cancellation of his sale deed and possession. (owner living in other state)
Sir, can I file an application u/s 156 (3)for registration of case u/s 420, 466, 467 etc. that on behalf of fabricated GPA he executed sale deed for this cheating. I have also got a letter from the Tehsildar mentioning that no such GPA is registered on which behalf he executed the sale deed in which mentioned my plot is as rasta.
Member (Account Deleted)
09 October 2014 at 14:02
I have a question.
E.g: Nisha met someone on a matrimonial website- he is a Belgian citizen. Says he is a businessman etc...
They start chatting and make future plans, but over the course of a year and a half, she realizes,
1. He is jobless,
2. He has just a registered name for a business, there is actually no business at all.
3. He's been working on an ecommerce store for months (he is a network engineer), but keeps making excuses to start.
He had employed the girl to get in touch with vendors and has paid her for the work, for which she has some invoices. These invoices are created by the Belgian man, so there are many spelling mistakes etc.
Well the girl didn't suspect that things are going to go sour later. Over time, the girl has been trying to get papers done- passport etc... but it is taking longer than expected, due to some mismatch in eligibility criteria.
When the Belgian saw that it is taking long, he started emotionally abusing the girl, calling her a cheater and a liar and a thief.
Now the girl does not want to go to him. She is afraid. Also, to leave everything familiar and to live in another country on social security payments isn't what she had thought about.
Now he is saying that he will contact Indian police and file a complain against the girl citing ROMANCE SCAMMING as the reason. She came to me- extremely scared.
She didn't scam him at all... in fact, she was cheated because he said he was employed and he is not. Also, his behaviour changed, drastically. Can he trouble her this way? Can he get her arrested?
Mohamed Ali
09 October 2014 at 12:53
Sir.
We are sunnihanafi family..in our family our grandmother was survived by only 2 daughters and her only son had predeceased her leaving behind a son and a daughter.
There was a suit for partition between heirs of grand mothers which was decreed in 1952, there were 2 types of properties town and revenue for part of decree regarding town properties final decree concluded in 1993, and execution of town properties is also completed and the properties are in joint possesion but for revenue part of the decree final decree is completed in 2011 and is pending Regular appeal no 48/2011 only for other part of decree concerned with revenue properties only..
our grandmother along with her sister is in joint possesion of town properties.
First we filed an interlocutory application in FDP court to delete these grandchildren from record but the FDP court dismissed our IA stating whether the LRs of decree holders will get share or not will not be determined by FDP court then we approached high court it is also upheld the view expressed by FDP court then only we filed declaratory suit.
Then 2 daughters filed a declaratory suit against predeceased sons children seeking declaration that only 2 daughters are entitled to inherit the left over property of their mother,but court dismissed suit saying 2 daughters are entitled for 2/3rd share only rest 1/3rd will go to residuaries in this case predeceased son and daughter... hence we filed a new partition suit for seperate possesion of our 2/3 share in town properties of our mother which are in joint possession with predeceased sons children from past 20 years.
Question: Now the court has dismissed our suit under order 2 rule 2 of cpc citing Regualr appeal is still pending u seek ur remedy there not in seperate suit. Judege has confused with the appeal pending for revenue properties but the FDP court has already rejected our claim to determine our shares in case if town properties then where we have to go to divide our joint town properties. It is not like we directly filed partition suit.
Can we file a review petition to clear the misunderstanding of the judghe insteading of directly going to appeal..
thanks
Ali
Deepak Kapadia
09 October 2014 at 12:52
1. Last promotion received (A to B Grade) Apr-2004
2. Case Period (Supplies to the customers) During 2004-05 (last supplies in Dec' 04)
3. B to C grade promotion under sealed cover (learnt) in Apr-2008
4. Charge-sheet issued on 04.10.12
5. Departmental Inquiry hearing proceedings (6 sittings) during Dec'12 to Jul'13
6.Final order on disciplinary case for “Censure Punishment” dated 19.09.2014 and acknowledged on 07.10.2014
DoPT OM ref. No. 22012/1/99-Estt(A) dated 14.09.1992 and subsequent clarifications says that promotion can not be restricted in sealed cover unless:
(i) Government servants under suspension.
(ii) Government servants in respect of whom a Charge-sheet has been issued and disciplinary proceeding are pending.
(iii) Government servants in respect of whom prosecution for a criminal charge is pending.
Can I fight in court for my promotion as DoPT guidelines not followed in my case.
What is the likely time period in which result can be expected?
dhanu
09 October 2014 at 11:51
dear sirs/experts,
I am the Plaintiff in person I have filed the suit with other applications.I will grateful if any one provide me the suggestion regarding written argument verses oral argument of my defendant lawyer, I need to know that can I say to the Judge to consider my applications and rejoinders as the written arguments please tell me the civil procedure code for the same and can i give citation with written argument.
regards,
Dhananjay
saj
09 October 2014 at 11:48
in Muslim marriage, while women asking khula(divorce), she has to return the mahr, if husband ask more than mahr to give consent to khula, is it permissible by law.(need detail inf)
sudhakar
09 October 2014 at 11:20
question is one person gowraiah married second wife after his fist wife death,fist wife has two children one boy12yrs the other is daughter 14yrs at the time second marriage.at he time second marriage mr gowraiah has debt of 100,000 ,after two years he has done marriage of his daughter with again debt of 100,000,then that boy(fist wife's son) realised i can not pay that debts so he left out form the house.son staying alone and doing job. the second wife intelligent she paid all the debts with support of her mother and father.with her family support and hardwork she maintained family well and in between she is helping financially fist wife's daughter. after that second wife has one son name mr madav and daughter name rekah ,after 20 yrs second wife son ,has bought land of 6 acres and he has done his sister marriage with his own salary and cash and given 2 acres to his sister rekha ,then the fist wife's son came he is asking of land share .the second son is saying it is my land i bought .fist wife son saying you have not got marriage so it comes joint propety.
so second wife's son refusing to give land share to fist wife's son,is it right or worng?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Updated order 2 rule 2 of cpc
Dear all,
As some important facts were missed,in earlier query
This is not a repeated query...
We are sunnihanafi family..in our family our grandmother was survived by only 2 daughters and her only son had predeceased her leaving behind a son and a daughter.
There was a suit for partition between among family of great grand mother which was decreed in 1952, there were 2 types of properties town and revenue for part of decree regarding town properties final decree concluded and attained finality in 1993, later RFA was filed in high by the parties aggrieved by the fdp allottment and finally it is concluded and also execution of town properties is also completed and now our properties are in joint possesion but for revenue part of the preliminary decree final decree is completed in 2011 and is pending Regular filed by the aggrieved parties only for other part of decree concerned with revenue properties only..
our grandmother along with her sister is in joint possesion of town properties from past 20 years, we want the properties to be partitioned among ourselves and the children of our predeceased brother .
First we filed an interlocutory application in FDP court in 2008 to delete these orphaned grandchildren from record but the FDP court dismissed our IA stating whether the LRs of decree holders will get share or not will not be determined by FDP court then we approached high court in writ petition it is also upheld the view expressed by FDP court,
then we 2 daughters filed a declaratory suit against children of predeceased son., seeking declaratiion tthat only 2 daughters are entitled to inherit the left over property of their mother,but court dismissed suit in 2013 saying 2 daughters are entitled for 2/3rd share only rest 1/3rd will go to residuaries in this case predeceased son and daughter...
hence we filed a new partition suit in 2013 for seperate possesion of our 2/3 share in town properties which have attained finality in 1993 of our mother which are in joint possession with us along with predeceased sons children from past 20 years.
Question: Now the court has dismissed our suit under order 2 rule 2 of cpc citing Regualr appeal is still pending u seek ur remedy there not in seperate suit. Judge has confused with the appeal pending , as it is pending only for the part of the decree concerned with revenue properties not town properties.
Where to seek the remedy as we started from FDP court..then high court and then declaratory suit in trial court and now partition suit also dismissed in trial court.
Can we file a review petition to clear the misunderstanding of the judge regarding finality of town properties and as we have already questioned about this in FDP court and we got negative response, insteading of directly going to appeal..
thanks
Ali