Anonymous
12 December 2021 at 14:31
sir
If civil suit submissions such as plaint, affidavits, are contrary to their own exhibits, does this attracts perjury?
sandesh
12 December 2021 at 12:08
my father and his brother has farm 11 bigahs which their father gave them out of this 3 bigha are on name of my father but we dont know which are this farm we want to sell them but are not able to what is the procedure to divide 3 bigas from the 11 bigahs .we have case on this farms we won the case but not collect the original jugment from court there is small kalam on this farms wat to do
ganesh soni
12 December 2021 at 10:37
Respected All,
I have worked in a private limited company for almost 15 years. During pandemic time I have lost my job with the same company. Although there was no PF in the company. So I have claimed gratuity from the company. In that context I have sent a registered letter to the company and they have received it. But company haven't done anything. So I have sent reminder letter to the company. Now they had refused it.
Since I am not eligible for PF and gratuity amount is my only hope.
Please suggest if there is any way to get gratuity as I am a layman.
Regards
Ganesh Singh
Anonymous
11 December 2021 at 21:53
Hello Friends,
Is it possible that section 9 will convert in to section 13 because if i will withdraw section 9 and file section 13 it will be time consuming, please suggest.
Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
11 December 2021 at 18:48
Hi,
I am illegitimate child , our father's ancestral property partion was done in 1981,when my father was unwell due to liver issues.He expired in 1982.I was minor at that time.In the partition deed all my father's sister,1st wife and his children's are given shares in the partition.My brother & me are not given shares in partition.we came to know about the partition deed few days back.pls guide for legal options,
Regards
Thrishika Kumar
11 December 2021 at 17:41
1. Republic of vindhya is an Asian subcontinent which is in India
2.The airport authority of vindya AAV is statutory authority and they want to create and upgrade it
3.kobayachi construction is a statutory body established In 1975 which is in singapore and one of the top construction company
4.In November AAV called a tender for construction of a new airport in Gotham city several projects were give to kobayachi company from vindhya which is in india
5.Later this project of AAV was given to the kobayachi company and kobayachi and AAV company entered into contract and Kobayachi company agreed to finish that project by December 2020 and they started the project on July 2016
6. On March 3rd 2019 kobayachi acquired Lim green energy it is renewable company energy in singapore generating power using solar and wind energy lim green energy is a wholly owned subsidiary of kobayachi and it also powers all of kobayachi projects
7.later kobayachi subcontracted lim green energy to supply electricity for construction of the new air port in Gotham city the entire project is ruined by power generated through these solar panels by subsidiary company
8.by end of December kobayachi had only completed 70 percent of construction contrary what was decided in agreement AAV decided to terminate the contract for breach in the following month AAV had still not cleared all the dues for construction that was already completed since the final payment was to be done after the construction of the project The government also called for a new tender for compulsion of the said project
9.The AAV despite several requests from kobayachi failed to make the payment aggrieved by this kobayachi along with LIM green approached honorable Supreme Court of vindya for the appointment of arbitration wherein they had to select two arbitrators from a panel of 5 recommended by the avv AAV even argued that this Court cannot appoint arbitrators since the arbitration is foreign seated kobayachi is also seeking an interim relief
Krishna Swamy
11 December 2021 at 15:09
I lost money through fake employment agency offering Job in Singapore paid money to Rameez Raja of Sumarkand Tours and Travel Calcutta. I am not getting job and not returned back money sir. Please get back money from him.
Manish Tripathi
11 December 2021 at 12:08
Whether HITPA is a PSU or a Private Company?
HITPA is a JV of 4 PSU, each PSU having 23.67% stake and 5% in GIC.
It is an Associate Company of National Insurance, New India Assurance, Oriental Insurance, United India insurance and GIC.
It's audit is conducted by statutory auditors apponits by CAG.
Anon P.
11 December 2021 at 09:21
DV Act case was filed in Andhra Pradesh. We live in Telangana. My parents are very old and cannot travel to defend.
Does High Court of AP has power to transfer case to Telangana?
Which Court do I have to go to transfer the case to Telangana?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Execution petition
The Plaintiff have filed a suit for (O.S.No.381/1969) Specific performance of the above agreement before the Vth Additional Judge,City Civil Court, Hyderabad parties have entered into a compromise (1st compromise) and wherein, the Respondents herein have offered to give 20 acres and 39 guntas to the Appellant/plaintiff.when the Respondents have failed to honour their commitment as per the above 1 st compromise decree, the DHR/Plaintiff filed the present E.P.No. 58/1984 before the executing court for execution.In this E.P. also, again both the parties have entered into another compromise and as per the 2 nd compromise, the DHR/Plaintiff was allotted 12 acres, after foregoing 8.39 acr. as they have declared excess land given to government
(2nd Compromise decree) DHR/Plaintiff was allotted 12 acres, and physical possession has been given JDR.
MY QUESTION.
DOCKET ORDER DATED 21.02.1985 IN EPno 58/1984 is as under
"compromise checked. the same is in order. compromise recorded EP is CLOSED.
AS THEIR WAS NO FINAL ADJUDICATION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE PARTIES ON MERITS. SO THAT I WILL NOT HIT BY LIMITATION
1. How you could say that E.P No58/1984 was closed by the court for "statistical purpose."
2. How this present (EA No 745/2015) petition is maintainable for reopening of EP NO. 58/1984 , as there was no EP filed, after recording compromise in the above Ep On 21.02.1985.