jagjit
31 October 2014 at 22:00
SIR , MY QUARRY IS THAT IF A LADY WIFE FILE DOWRY CASE AGAINST HUSBAND AND HIS FAMILY AND THE CASE IS REGISTERED U/S 498A,406,3/4 DP ACT. AND LATER AFTER THE INVESTIGATION INVESTIGATING OFFICER FILE THE CHARGE SHEET UNDER SECTION 498A,3/4 DP ACT. IF IO REDUCE THE SECTION 406 THEN MY QUARRY IS THAT, THAT WHAT IS THE VALIDITY OF 3/4 DP ACT. AS 3/4 DP ACT IS THE SECTION 3 AND 4 OF DP ACT AND ACCORDING TO THAT IT IS THE PUNISHMENT FOR TAKING DOWRY. ONCE IO OMITTED THE 406 THEN HOW THE 3/4 DP ACT VALID IN CHARGE SHEET.
narindersagar
31 October 2014 at 21:59
sir,my father was totally illiterate(angutha chaap) property was mortgage with possession by my father for 35000/- in year of 1971 which was mortgage registered this is usufructry as mortgage property was attached money decree passed property put on auction mortgagee purchased the property by permission of the court himself for 82000/- all the orders passed the court without notice after that compromise was done in court in which mortgager have to give the possession the keys of demised property after getting the possession by the mortgagee 35000/ will be paid to the mortgager the confirmation of sale was confirmerd by the court on the basis of compromised lateron the comrpromised was back out warrant of possession was issued in execution all legal objection is dissmissed upto supermecourt without merrits only on long littigation of 35 year hitory and money decree converted in to mortgage decree in execution we tendred decreetal amount as per transfer of property act 60 with jugements of supermecourt of india on this act 1 air 1997 superme court 456 tited parichan mistry v/s acchibar mistry and air1963 sc 1041 prithi nath singh v/s suraj ahir but execution was under pressure of apex court orders no where said about redemption matter and executing said the mortgage is extinguished by money decree and compromise in tpt act compromised should be registered instrument as per law and decree should debar the mortgager but nothing such thing has happened the possession of property has taken by the mortgagee the suit redemtion is pending in court was filed in limitation of 30 years is that suit will be effected by the judgement of sc (I am on road lost house as well rozi roti i am seniour citizen lost every thing for money only and tell me extungishment of redemtion is right is extinguished or not
narindersagar
31 October 2014 at 21:55
sir,my father was totally illiterate(angutha chaap) property was mortgage with possession by my father for 35000/- in year of 1971 which was mortgage registered this is usufructry as mortgage property was attached money decree passed property put on auction mortgagee purchased the property by permission of the court himself for 82000/- all the orders passed the court without notice after that compromise was done in court in which mortgager have to give the possession the keys of demised property after getting the possession by the mortgagee 35000/ will be paid to the mortgager the confirmation of sale was confirmerd by the court on the basis of compromised lateron the comrpromised was back out warrant of possession was issued in execution all legal objection is dissmissed upto supermecourt without merrits only on long littigation of 35 year hitory and money decree converted in to mortgage decree in execution we tendred decreetal amount as per transfer of property act 60 with jugements of supermecourt of india on this act 1 air 1997 superme court 456 tited parichan mistry v/s acchibar mistry and air1963 sc 1041 prithi nath singh v/s suraj ahir but execution was under pressure of apex court orders no where said about redemption matter and executing said the mortgage is extinguished by money decree and compromise in tpt act compromised should be registered instrument as per law and decree should debar the mortgager but nothing such thing has happened the possession of property has taken by the mortgagee the suit redemtion is pending in court was filed in limitation of 30 years is that suit will be effected by the judgement of sc (I am on road lost house as well rozi roti i am seniour citizen lost every thing for money only and tell me extungishment of redemtion is right is extinguished or not
anil
31 October 2014 at 21:22
Mere dada ji k 3 bete the
A B C
Dada ji ki property ka
Teeno beto m aapas m 2004 m court se sulahanaame k sath property Ka alag alag batwara ho gaya
C mere father the,
hum 4 bhai or 3 bahan h, jisme se humari 1 sabse badi bahan ki death 2008 m ho gyi thi,
mother ki death 2009 m hui thi
or father ki death 1-09-2014 m hui h,unhone koi vasiyat bhi nhi ki h
Hum unki sabse choti beti h or married h,meri marriage 18-2-2000 m hui thi
Father ko batwara hone pr city m 2 property or village m kafi land mili thi
villege ki land raibaraily tahseel m h, 30 beegha agriculturel land h,
City wali property m mere 4 bhai rahte h, 4 flat h or 10 shops h
Wo bhaiyo k pass h
Village ki jameen Abhi papa k naam chadi nhi thi or papa ki death ho gyi
Ab mere bhai usme bhi apna naam likhwa rahe h or kah rahe h ki tumhara naam nhi likh sakta h,aisa kanoon bana hua h
kuch lucknow k waqeel kah rahe h ki agricultural land m ladkiyo ka hissa nahi hota h, married beti ka to hota hi nahi h, sir kya ye baat sahi h?
Kya ye sahi h ki mujhe mere dada ji ki property m kuch nahi milenga
Plz mujhe sahi law kya kahta h batay
kyoki kuch waqeel kahte h ki aapka adhikar 100% banta h, city ki or villege ki dono m hota h
or sir kya badi bahan jinki death ho gayi unke husband ka property m adhikaar h?
sir pls give reply
Thnx
POOJA KHANNA
Lucknow
Pankaj Patil
31 October 2014 at 21:00
I have a property case which is going on in Bombay high court on Aurangabad Bench.
The justice has given judgement as below:
ORALÂ ORDERÂ Â :
 After all the office objections are removed, liberty is granted to the parties to apply for circulation for placing Civil Application for orders.Â
Action :
AFTER OFFICE OBJECTIION REMOVE LIBERTY GRANT.
I am unable to understand this judgement, so request your expert advice.
Regards,
Pankaj Patil
I have given complaint to municipal commissioner he doesn't provide received copy to us. is there any andhra pradesh go for this
Chand Singhania
31 October 2014 at 20:23
Within how many days of submission of final papers of MCD and after completion of all hearing, does the divorce process gets completed or court grants the divorce?
Final hearing has been done and paper submitted. Within how many days usually court gives the decree??
atul kumar
31 October 2014 at 20:00
Sir,
Before more than A year, one of known help me with the sum of Rs. 25000.00 (Twenty five thousand) after a time i returned his money back by cash and some with transfer to his another bank account, After some time he also asked me for help him with some money, though that time i was not sure that i can help him i tried to help him and give him two checks with different amount.total was 87000.00 but i can not arrange that money and the checque were bounced. but after that i give him cash of Rs. 100000.00. and did not asked him for cheque back.
Now after A year he send me a legal notice through a lawyer and blaming that i have taken Rs 350000.00 for flat purchasing, and he is threatening me that if i am not paid that amount within 15 days he will file civil case against me as per section 1860. please help me and guide me. i want fight a battle with him.
my father had an gramahathana panchayti site about 2.1 guntas & even mutation records in his name in year 1985.
1>my query is can i buy agricultural land in karnataka based on above records?
2>one of my friend suggested to buy an agricultural land in chennai & then buy agricultural land in karnataka.now pls throw light on this.......
3>how 2 buy agricultural land in karnataka???????
Validity of 3/4 dp act
SIR , MY QUARRY IS THAT IF A LADY WIFE FILE DOWRY CASE AGAINST HUSBAND AND HIS FAMILY AND THE CASE IS REGISTERED U/S 498A,406,3/4 DP ACT. AND LATER AFTER THE INVESTIGATION INVESTIGATING OFFICER FILE THE CHARGE SHEET UNDER SECTION 498A,3/4 DP ACT. IF IO REDUCE THE SECTION 406 THEN MY QUARRY IS THAT, THAT WHAT IS THE VALIDITY OF 3/4 DP ACT. AS 3/4 DP ACT IS THE SECTION 3 AND 4 OF DP ACT AND ACCORDING TO THAT IT IS THE PUNISHMENT FOR TAKING DOWRY. ONCE IO OMITTED THE 406 THEN HOW THE 3/4 DP ACT VALID IN CHARGE SHEET.
if THE SAME THING HAPPENED TO ME THEN CAN I WRITE TO SSP OF THE CONCERN POLICE STATION TO TAKE THE CONGNIGENCE AGAINST MY WIFE AND IN-LAWS UNDER SECTION 3 OF DP ACT AS THEY HAVE ACCEPTED THAT THEY HAVE GIVEN THE DOWRY. THOUGH I GOT MARRIED AT GURUDWARA IN SIMPLE MANNER WITHOUT ANY DEMAND AND DOWRY, BUT FALSLY BLAMED.