ajay thakur
17 December 2014 at 21:09
राम श्याम का grandson हे. राम अपने दादाजी से उनकी कृषि जमीन के एक टुकडे को अपने नाम करना चाहता हे श्याम भी इसके लिए राजी हे किंतु राम वसीयत के द्वारा जमीन का टुकडा प्राप्त नहीँ करना चाहता क्यूंकि उसे भविष्य मेँ श्याम के वसीहत मे परिवर्तन कर देने का संदेह है इसलिए राम किस प्रकार श्याम से कृषि भूमि के टुकडे काे अपने नाम पर अधिकार प्राप्त कर सकता हे वो भी बिना रजिस्ट्री कराये हुए
shashidhar
17 December 2014 at 20:48
Dear Sir/Madam, In a civil case before trial. The plaintiff requested the defendent for prodcution of documents under rule 14 section 30 of cpc. The defendent did not produce the document and trying to mislead and divert the court from the facts. Is there any section/judgement mandating the judge to order for production of the document in question which is very essential for the plaintiff to prove the facts of his case?
prashant
17 December 2014 at 20:02
On purchase of goods we have not paid VAT before filing of Income Tax Return whether the amount of VAT will be added u/s 43B of Income Tax Act at the time of computation of Income or amount of purchase on which VAT is not paid at the time of filing of Income Tax Return u/s 43B of Income Tax Act
suryagaurav
17 December 2014 at 19:56
what is the legal status of POA holder in property. Whether he is owner or not.what is his status.
abhishek dubey
17 December 2014 at 19:42
Sir what is the maximum rate of fair rent that a tenanat occupying non residential building in tamil nadu has to pay, the tenanat being a govt deptt.?
Dharmender
17 December 2014 at 19:31
My wife has filed cases under DV Act and 498a in Nov 2007.Both are still pending as they are lingering
She has filed case under sec 125 in Dec 2008.The summons were not done at that time.But through my sources I checked in Court that the case was closed in May 2011 as she didn't appear in Court.
Now in Nov 2014 the summons were again done in case under 125.Is it not abuse of process of court.Sending summons after 6 year and starting case.
Is there any judgement of Apex Court regarding the abuse of process of court.
sandeep shukla
17 December 2014 at 19:01
sir,
if in any matter judgment is reserved by the court, what will be the status of the impugned action/orders under challenge in the writ petition?
a general presumption is, when a court reserves the judgment, it means that the matter has been kept in abeyance and the court wishes to consider the matter.
if any authority in the aforesaid point is available...............plz let me know.
Kvijay12345
17 December 2014 at 18:58
In case of Unsecured Personal Loans a recovery certificate is been issued in which there is no mention of any property owned by the borrower.This same order is challenged by the borrower in DRAT with the waiver application for the fees.However the recovery certificate holder, Asset Reconstruction company has filed a miscellaneous application for the attachment of the flat,and got the order for attachment of flat fromn DRT while the appeal in DRAT is still pending and also sent a legal notice to the chairman of the society in which the borrower owns a flat requesting the society not to allow anybody to deal with the same flat in whatsoever manner.The asset reconstruction company have stuck the order of attachment on the doors of the flat.The flats mentioned are already mortgaged with other banks and the dispute over the home loan agreement is also pending in court. What will happen next? What are the remedies left with the borrower to stop the recovery proceedings?
Harish Wani
17 December 2014 at 18:23
Dear Experts,
Please let me know which authority i need to apporach for starting a hospital in Gujarat or which is the mother legsilation under which Hospital are covered like Shop and Establishment, Clinical Establishments etc.
Thanks in Advance
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Cibil - need an expert advise please
Dear Sir,
I haven't seen an expert in these forums on this particular topic, answers to my earlier questions have been generic.
I defaulted on 3 credit cards from 3 different banks as I was jobless. I settled these cards in December 2011. 2 Banks stopped reporting it to CIBIL after the amount was settled. One bank continues to report it to CIBIL even to this date. And they say they will continue to report until the waived off amount is paid.
My question is
1. How long can they continue to report to CIBIL even though the account is settled.
2. How is that 2 banks stopped reporting and 1 continues to report. Is there different regulations for different banks.
I ask this question because CIBIL maintains the record of a closed account only for 7 years after the bank has stopped reporting. But the third bank will continue to ruin my credit score till the time I am alive.
Please help.
Regards
Abraham.