Krishnan.k
14 May 2015 at 18:28
Hello,
1.My Great Grandmother owned a property in tamilnadu, bought from her own income.
2.She had only one son which is my Grandpa
3. He had 2 children a boy (Elder) and a girl (Younger) (My mother and her Elder Brother)
4.My grandpa and grandma passed away when my great grandma was alive.
5.So the owner of the property My great grandma lived longer than my grand parents and passed away later
6.Until my Great grandma passed away she owned the property solely but she used the land for some loan (Mortgage) purpose whenever there is a need in the family.
7. She never wrote any will regarding that property, and no registered document is there for the directions about the land after her death.
8. After my great granmma passed away. The elder boy and the younger girl where the legal hiers of the land & both got married at the time.
9.The land documents and the patta was in the name of my great granmma all through the time
10. My mother and her elder brother,
11.some 20years back the Elder brother of the family has registered the property in the name of his wife, stating in the document that As he is the only owener of the property he tranfers it as a gift settlement to his wife. and register the document.
11.He never transfered the ownership from my great granma to his. but directly transfered the property to his wife. (Even when he gave a settlement deed to his wife, the land was in the ownership of my great grandmother. and no name transfer is done).
Now we filed a case in the district court and since the elder didnt appreaed for the case it was given Ex-party.
Kindly provide me information regarding the possibilities of the opposite party (Elder brother) for going to high court appeal and what are all the negative areas we have even after we won by exparty.
Is there any possibilty that the elder can win the case in the high court when he didnt even appeared in the district court??
Anil Kumar
14 May 2015 at 18:18
I realize it's a childish, immature question, but I couldn't find anything related to this topic, need clarity in this regard.
We have a house on a 80 ft road, we recently put up fence upto 15 ft from our house in the area between road and house, which we don't own obviously. Lot of others on this road have encroached around 20 ft on both sides! Govt doesn't bother to check this road, it's rarely used, not a main road.
The high court has STRICTLY ordered, and even commented strong words to the nagar nigam dept to shift all the cattle owners to the outskirts, where land is alloted to these dairy owners. But nagar nigam is SO CORRUPT that they just seize the cows and return it back after taking bribes!
The order is 2-3 years old, They are repeatedly disobeying high court, the high court panel was pissed off once, said,"If nagar nigam doesn't get it done by the last date, we will send their officials also to live with the cows!!"
We put up fence because of stray cattle only, they are left for grazing in huge numbers at midnight, and the cows and bulls ransack our car, front door etc at midnight, for no reason! And it's because nagar nigam's fault that we are forced to put up fencing, even though we don't wanna break any laws. We own the house since 18 years, but shifted here last year.
IF in the future, the city TRULY becomes cattle free, we will gladly remove the fencing on our own.
TILL THEN, if they come here against encroachment:
1. Is it mandatory to give us warning first? Our fence is portable type, can be removed in few hours.
2. What legal action can they initiate?
3. Can they take action against us SOLELY, while leaving others scot free? The other encroachers have few political connections, I am pretty sure there won't be any action against them.
4.(I know it sounds childish, please bear with me)
Can we blame the nagar nigam on their own failure (dealing with dairy owners) and use it as an excuse to prevent any legal action?
mcs law
14 May 2015 at 18:05
Hi,
I need help in dv act which has been filled on me by my brothers wife ...she has stated all false case ....please tell me how to handle it and proceed further .
Thanks and regards..
kaur
14 May 2015 at 17:56
FIR was lodged on directions of court during year 2010. Police put up cancellation report to court during year 2011 on point of jurisdiction. Court did not accept and directed police to investigate accordance with law. Police again during the year 2013 submitted cancellation report and we received summons titled Kaur Vs State. My advocate submitted objection reply to court and requested that FIR may not be cancelled and may be transferred to concerned police station where the offence occurred. Than police after taking number of dates from court submitted reply that case cannot be filed due to jurisdiction. That court put up for consideration and my advocate again argued that FIR may be cancelled. The Judge just wrote on case file that SHO directed to re-investigate. My query is that no order is loaded on internet on court sites and it shows case status : Case Disposed. Nature of Disposal : Uncontested - Rejected. Please can you help me to understand what what this means when I have contested the case how it mentioned Uncontested or is it applicable to police. Please clarify.
tarun
14 May 2015 at 15:58
Case status shows - case disposed
Nature of disposal - Contested-Dismissed
Please tell the meaning of these terms.
It shows against our bail request.
Hemnag
14 May 2015 at 14:55
Hi Sir,
Am working with a private consultancy(X) and they deputed me in one of the Engineering services concern(Y), when am joining they said within six months sure they will take me as a permanent employee of (Y), I joined with them by 15/10/2014 but in fifth month, the company (Y) said your contract has been closed you can relieve immediately by 10/03/2015, this they informed me in that same day, then after 15 day later they deputed me in other company(Z) by 25/03/2015 but for that 15 days they did not gave me any salary, ok its fine, as of till date am working them for more than 6 months but i don't know for how many days long last here but sure one day the same will happen, so now i resigned my job of having a better permanent job, as my age is 26 in next one year i have to settle down before my marriage,
They are not accepting my resignation letter and they replied as "you have to serve at least for six months" as am working with them for more than six months they are saying that in this concern (Z) you have to serve at least for six months but they have not mentioned anywhere in my offer letter that i have to serve for six months, they asked for only prior 30 days notice period as i have given the notice period by 09/05/2015 asking to relieve me by 08/0682015 but now they are not ready to pick my call also for past four days in the consultant(X), in the new company i have given the joining date as 10/06/2015.
Kindly help me in this.
Sanjeev kumar
14 May 2015 at 14:48
Dear Sir/Madam,
This is Sanjeev from Meerut UP.
Recently i made new small house in private colony in Sadhu Nagar Kanker khera Meerut.
i did apply for new electric domestic connection but JEE/SDO. are not response since last 6 month.
1. Distance of Pole : 82 mtr. from my house
2. cross wire on roof of some people house distance around 15-20 mtrs from my house
and some connection has provided in earlier from cross wire.
JEE/SDO asking me estimate expenses 1.5 lac. on single connection which i m unable to paid this too much amount.
so please help me what i can do to get new electric connection
Best Regards
Sanjeev
MO 9899838495
Anonymous
14 May 2015 at 13:21
Sir I want to know that, why the reservation system is based on cast wise. I want to know our country have every general candidate are brilliant and economical strong why Noone can see the reservation system is encourage the general students. I want to submit a PIL against it so I want to advice.
Sushil Wattal
14 May 2015 at 13:02
Sir, Please tell me what is the time limit for setting aside ex-parte proceeding- my specific question is regarding Ex-parte proceedings only not related to ex-parte Decree
defendant has set ex-parte on 16-7-2014 and he moved an application for setting aside ex-parte proceedings on 09-09-2014
Plzz suggest me whether the application is on time, if not whether Condonation of delay application is required or compulsory (I AM FOR PLAINTIFF SIDE)
If possible plz also provide some judgements
REGARDS,
Sushil
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Ancestor property dispute
Is Registered "MRUTHYA PATRA" or "Will" is viable for Muslims