Uday Singha
30 July 2015 at 22:13
I had entered into a JV with a promoter to develop my land.After completion of building in 2000 the promoter refused to hand over my share of 2 flats demanding money.I approached the courts and got a favourable judgement in2012. The promoters were ordered to hand over possesion of the said flats and their demand for money was dismissed. Hoever they did not handover the documents. I obtained certified copies of all deeds from the registry offices.
I want to sell the flats but buyers are not getting bank loans against certfied copies. I have two queries,
a) Is there a possibility of getting the original docoments from the promoter? What will be the procedure?
b) Will I be able to sell the flats on the basis of certified copies of deeds?
maria
30 July 2015 at 21:49
sir,
i'm writing this on behalf of my friend.here the boy an Indian (Keralite) and girl a Phillipine worked together in DUBAI and they were in a relationship and the girl gave birth to a child and the baby girl is 5 years old now.
but the boy and girl separated even before the babys birth. when the baby was 2 years the girl got married to an Australian only because of her financial circumstances but the girl and child living in phillipines alone now.they donot have any financial support from anyone. the little girls indian father is not accepting the fact that she conceived from him. but she is very sure about that. now what she should do to get atleast a financial support from the little ones real father.
basavaraj shiromani
30 July 2015 at 21:32
in a complaint lodged u/s 138 of ni act, after examination chief of the complainant, whether acused can be restricted to ask limited questions regarding issued chque only ? (on the grounds of summery trial) the accused intends to cross examine the complainant in detail regarding the authorization, rebuttal of presumption u/s 139 of NI act and the aspects of Sec 142 of the Ni act. what he curtailed to do so. what steps he has to take at this movement ? whether he is to file an application u/s 145 of NI act, seeking prmission to cross examine the complainant in detail without any restrictions ?
Naresh Thakur
30 July 2015 at 20:49
Sir,
I was appointed as a Vidya Upashak in Government School in Education department on fixed honararium basis by the Himachal Pradesh Govt through HP state subordinate selection board by conducting state wise test and interview. I joined my duties on 16/08/2000.My department regularize my services as JBT vide order dated 01/10/2007. There is no break in my service. Now my department covered me under new pension scheme (NPS) which starts as on 15/05/2003. But I want that I was covered under CCS Pension rule 1972 i.e. Old Pension scheme. I want to know that my post is substantive/officiating/temporary.
You are requested to please let me know whether the period from 16/08/2000 to 01/10/2007 will be include in qualifying period of service or not. Please mention the rule/G.O.also.and oblige me.
Yours Faithfully,
Naresh Kumar
President
HPVU Sangh
james
30 July 2015 at 20:18
Police filed a charge sheet against one accused and trial started.Charge framed and some witness examined.In the meanwhile Police filed a report us 173(8) crpc stating that the accused is not the real culprit and a new pereon arrayed as accused.What is the procedure to be adopted for trial- The existing trial and the new trial against the new accused?
sarabjeet
30 July 2015 at 19:39
my uncle is a victim of mala fide, he is gold smith ,now he is facing problems due to malafide by one of his customer ,who actually is a thief,he sold some fence ,& that time my uncle was not aware of that.now after 4 years police catch that thief & they want to arrest them.the police belongs to different state..please respond ....
vinit
30 July 2015 at 17:45
can i pay one time settlement amount by Nifty online transaction from my account or i have to pay thr.Cheque? pls guide
Anonymous
30 July 2015 at 17:34
Sir l m working in pharma compan. I have leaved my last company to give one month notice now i work in other pharma company since last 1 year. But still I did not received my final settlement from my old company. Even I submit all company property pls help me
Yeshwant
30 July 2015 at 16:39
Hi,
There is a difference in Plot number mentioned in EC and Sale Deed.
How to find out the correct one.
As per EC plot no. is 252, whereas Sale Deed is having plot no. as 282. Rest all are matching.
Please advise.
Thanks and Regards,
Yeshwant Gupta.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Auction deposit
i participate a bid for the allotment of a shop room by the kerala irrigation department. I quote next below the toppest bidder. subsequently the toppest bidder singed and got the bid. being lost the bid i engaged for another business. now the department send letter me to take the bid as the topper was withdrawn from the bid. they warned me also that they will confiscate my deposit money if i does not take and sin the bid agreement. The tender was finalised on 20.05.2015 and i applied for refund of my deposit on15.16.2015. whether the department is right in confiscating my money or i b have a right to get back my deposit money ?