vibhu
20 August 2015 at 11:32
Gud mrng experts. I want to say that father has been expired and he has his earned property. I want to know is wife has right to will for transfer this property to anyone. Second i want to know do this property can directly transfer to anyone? At present there is no will of my grandfather written by him.
Respected Sir's
I am a Landlord of a property in Mumbai. I have filed a case in small cause court against my tenant and simultanouesly Tenant has filed suit against corporation for the same matter which is in small cause court.In both the cases the tenant has given false evidence in his written statements and Plaints. He has not given true statement to his advocates also and that is why the advocates have filed statements on the Tenants words.
Secondly the original tenant is still alive and he has added his sons name in the premises.In the court Tenant says it is his properitory concern and in actual he has added his sons name without the permission of the Landlord. As far as I understand the law it is clear that the son's right comes over the property only after the original tenant expires.The tenant is a commercial Tenant and after his death the son should be in the same profession as his father.
What are the rights of a brother in a brothers property.
Please clarify the above queries and oblige
Thanking you in advance.
Charanjit
20 August 2015 at 11:25
Is it legal to assign marks to candidate having NET only and the candidate having both I.e.NET and PhD?
Muthulakshmi
20 August 2015 at 11:16
Sir/Msdam I got divorce on june 1 i cant get order copy till now.i need this order copy for exam.my lawyer yold me that we can get copy only after finished of 100 cases.is it true.kindly suggest me.
For age relaxation i can use this divorcee option..
Kumarsirik
20 August 2015 at 11:12
Dear Learned members
This entire suit of cases pertain to failure of considerations on a land deal and subsequent dishonor of cheques issued against the purchased lands.
These suit of cases have come up for a full and final settlement in the respective courts of law
My query related to dishonor of cheque is put up for your advise in one of my queries, subject line being "Section 138 NIA Settlement at Lok Adalat"
In this query I seek advise on precautions to be taken with regards to settlement of civil cases.
The accused purchased land from me and had given it for development with a promise that a certain number of flats shall be registered to me as payment towards purchase of lands. Subsequently, when the construction completed he defaulted. He sold one of the flats that was original promised to me. I requested him to hand over the other flats and the monetary consideration he received with the hasty sale proceeds. He did not comply.
We had no option but to file a suit demanding justice.
There are other suits filed by my sisters, who have ownership on the earlier transacted land. This was only to put more pressure on the obstinate respondent of the case.
Now, the party has come for settlement before lok adalat. He insists that we draft and MOU and then file compromise notes against each of these cases and withdraw them. Against each case he would give me certain consideration of what he is due only after the case is withdrawn.
I had my doubts on his authenticity as he seemed to have a legacy of defaulting.
I wanted him to give the consideration agreed in MOU for each case before I withdraw the case. My concern is he may default again after I withdraw a case. Hi fear is that I may not withdraw case after he gives me the consideration.
This settlement process hit a roadblock with neither of us yielding to the others' approach.
I thought there should be a standard approach towards such settlements.
Thousands of such cases being dealt with in Lok Adalat would have a similar stalemate kind of situation.
I wanted to know how these situations are usually handled.
Muthulakshmi
20 August 2015 at 11:10
Sir/Madam I got divorce on june 1 i cant get order copy till now. i need this order copy for exam.my lawyer told me that we can get copy only after finished of 100 cases.
As you suggest me i went to apply for order copy but they ask a no abjection letter from my lawyer.is it true.kindly suggest me.
Kumarsirik
20 August 2015 at 10:51
Dear Learned members
This entire suit of cases pertain to failure of considerations on a land deal and subsequent dishonor of cheques issued against the purchased lands.
These suit of cases have come up for a full and final settlement in the respective courts of law.
I shall address the cheques issue here and in another query will explain the other cases and the advise I require.
The accused approached for settlement to be executed at Lok Adalat. He informed magistrate about his intent. I consented in the court.
I presume there is a 15% fee to be paid for settlement at Lok Adalat. So the counsel on behalf of accused suggested we close the case unconditionally and without any payment, as would be stated in the compromise note, only after drafting an MOU . The MOU would state that the accused shall pay me the amount he is liable to pay, while, in front of the Lok Adalat we appeal for withdrawal of the case condoning he accused.
Is this a safe procedure?
Secondly, the accused insists that the case be withdrawn first and only then the amount shall be paid. My fear is that there is a possibility he may violate the terms of MOU.
What is the course of action under such circumstances?
Is there a safer approach to handle the settlement procedure? It is also possible that the accused and his counsel my be hoodwinking me by overwhelming with lot of legal intricacies that are not within comprehension for a layman.
is father's name required in school admission for a child ?
Ravi kumar M
20 August 2015 at 05:48
A registered sale agreement with fixed time was cancelled through a written letter sent by purchaser to seller after fixed time of agreement without doing cancellation at register office.Advice wheather the agreement still subsists due to non cancellation at register office and can seller after acknowledging letter can finalise sale to any other person
Mumbai rto refusing to pay ltt refund
Hello Sir,
I am residing in Karnataka udupi.I had purchased car from mumbai on 2014 and had bought to karnataka. As per Rules i had obtained NOC from mumbai rto and submitted all documents with proof of migration and transfer of ownership from mumbai to udupi. I paid tax in karnataka on Dec 2014. After paying tax i got RC book with MH registration .When i inquired regarding KA Registration mark they asked me to visit in February 1st week.I applied for KA Registration mark on Feb 2,2014. when i inquired regarding the Process they told they dint get any intimation from Mumbai RTO, I visted Mumbai RTO and took Approval letter from them and i again submitted to Udupi RTO. Udupi RTO People asked me to wait another 2 weeks after surrendering my RC book and all the documents. On March 1st i visted Udupi RTO and to my surprise they are telling they have misplaced my File.i visited nearly everyday til june 2014.On june 2,2014 the Rto officer called me and told they are processing me with KA Number. After getting New KA number. i visited mumbai RTO for claiming Refund i applied along with application,that the car has been taken out of state on june 15,2015 .But after one month i am getting a letter from Mumbai RTO stating that my refund Appplication was rejected as per Maharashtra RTO Act,1959 stating that the claim has to be processed within six month of issuance of NOC from mumbai RTO. Please Hep me
Regards
Shwetha