ramprasad patel
31 October 2015 at 23:07
sir , I have received a police notice that writes section 160 ja. phou. what is section 160 ja. phou.?
Jayesh shah
31 October 2015 at 22:40
The society of 10 members having 7 members of one community. They appointed builder of their choice. there after the majority members colluded with Builder and taken the extra space at concessional rate. the Builder denied the concession to other minority members. The Builder went to court against me the minority member for evacuation from my flat in High court. I argued in High court but high court telling that Builder has right to give concession to whomsoever he wish and refuse our please for concession as the same to other majority members. wanted help from Mumbai lawyer
jitender
31 October 2015 at 22:36
Pl advise ref limitation period of 3 yrs for debt and any exceptions to it and under which 3yrs period restarts.
Milind
31 October 2015 at 22:20
I have been selected for a post of Chief Manager-Mechanical at a ship building PSU. The post of is for ship/submarine construction, refits, modernization, in any relevant fields of planning / design / procurement/ fabrication / berth / outfitting / quality assurance / tests & trials. I have very low vision in my left eye as per guideline of physical disability it is 30% disability. After premedical examination, company has declared me medically unfit for the post on the grounds that my left eye is not healthy. There is no mention of any standards in advertisement specifying that one eyed persons are not eligible to apply. The advertisement only mentions as. ”Applicants should be of sound health and meet the medical fitness standards as prescribed. Candidates short-listed for appointment following interview shall undergo a medical test conducted/organised by company and certified by the company’s Chief Medical Officer”. Please advise if I have any claim on the post can I fight legally. I feel that as the position is Managerial and I can perform all the activities as a normal person I should be given opportunity to work.
Member (Account Deleted)
31 October 2015 at 21:50
I am anticipating opposite party Post office to file SLP in Supreme court against dismissal of their RP with NCDRC Delhi.
Online filing of caveat is still under construction on supreme court website
Hence can I have cop[y of format for filing caveat or a link is given so I can prepare and personally file this with registrar of supreme court ? Is there any fee to be paid for this?
Namrata
31 October 2015 at 20:57
Hi all Repsected Sir/Madam
I would like to ask you one query related redevelopment.
against redevelopment v hv filed suit in city civil mumbai.
Managing Committee Members doenst followed rules of society act for redevelopment. Building was in dilapidated condition, so people was not staying there since 2 to 3 years.
Managing Committee issued tender in 2010 and opened in 2012 and passed resolution in 2012 i.e. after 2 years.
Is that proper to open and passed tender after 2 years?
4 people not even handed over possession of there flats and not even signed any consent letter or agreement for redevelopment still society demolished building by taking advantage of notice us 354 of bmc.
Can they do such things without using due course of law for vacating flat holders?The Said managing without having authority done the said demolition work after getting notice of motion from us.
The said managing commitee members period lapsed in 2013 nov and they got extension from registrar but that letter clearly mentioned that no major decision shall be taken with respect to society.
Still they done such act and even managing committee as their own demanded notice of pull down from BMC vide written application.
Is that correct way of demolition?
loopwholes in redevelopment:
1. tender taken in 2010 and open in 2012.
2. they are never diclosed anything about fungible FSI in GEn. Meeting and then directly PAP agreement executed with other for area 380 sq. ft. including fungible. Is that right?
3. Gen. Body passed that builder will give 0.33 FSI in terms of Compensation or Area but now builder not get agreed and even denying that 0.33 FSI applicable to Mumbai suburban. But v hav receipt through which they have purchased said add. FSI by paying premium.
4. Due to rent all members are with them and v r only 4 who fighting against all illegalities.
V r not actually against redevelopment but against illegalities and fraud.
Is there any positive chances of getting justice.
V have evidence but no registrar, no co-operation commissioner and no court r able to look into detailed of those documents. They are just giving judgment on majority.
that means if majority supports illegalities then minority also have to go with them.
This is total injustice with honest society members.
Many advocates r negative about matter. They are saying that there are many judgment in favour of majority only.
kindly provide us proper guidance.
Veeragandham Anjanee Kumar
31 October 2015 at 20:50
I have registered with just dial ltd for lead generation of my web development business in Hyderabad. I paid 3 months in advance and also they took ECS mandate from me to deuct Rs.2300 every month from my bank account. Afterthat, they started sending some leads to my mobile and email. I noticed that the leads sent by them are totally false, irrelevant and fake. none of them are genuine and I realised that I made a mistake. After seeing for 6 months I realised that they are cheating me with wrong leads. I asked them to discontinue my registration and stop the ECS deduction. They continue to deduct my money even after asking for discontinuing. When called their customer care department, they speak some irrelevant things and try to divert your discussion. Finally they say that they will continue to deduct for 9 months because it is there in the agreement. I said when i am not getting any service from you and requested for delisting my business with Justdial, what right do they have to take money from me simply without giving any product or service in return to me. I am now totally convinced that these people are cheaters and liers. My advice to anyone is not to go to them for any reason except you have lots of money to give to these beggars. Please do not trust those people at all and someone from the government may look into the matter and control such fraudulent people. Otherwise, everyone will think that they can also cheat people like justdial.
I want to know is there any way to stop such websites in soliciting for business and wrongly registering customers against payment with false promises etc.
ckanta
31 October 2015 at 20:19
Plaintiff has filed one suit for specific performance on the basis of unreg. agreement to sell for consideration of rs 3L and it has already been paid to defendant and in suit for specific performance and mandatory injunction in prayer clause we have asked to deliver possession of the property as we have paid considertaion and defendant has to deliver possession which he failed to do so alternatively we have also claimed damages of rs 12 l and refund of consideration with interest. Please suggest on what amount we should pay court fees. query is on what amount court fees is to be paid ?? It should be 3l which was total consideration of the agreement OR as per the value of the property as we are claiming mandatory injunction and possession. .PLease suggest.
P RaviShankar-cell-8939332195
31 October 2015 at 20:15
I filed 156(3) crpc petition before magistrate in the year 2011 and he passed orders to acp of police to investigate and submit police report. For past 5 years he did not investigate complaint to protect accused and commissioner of police, dgp, and few senior government officials have conspired against me. Last week I complained to magistrate and he ordered status report from police. What should I do to have all of them behind bars and in status report if police say that they are not able to find accused, what should I do. Please help me.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
unstamped loan agreement
Dear all ,
1. Can the stamp duty be paid after execution of the loan agreement ? If yes how ? If no why ?
2. Can the loan agreement be executed after disbursement of loan?
Please guide me