anil rajubhai kunwar
04 November 2015 at 09:38
HELLO SIR...
MY NAME IS ANIL MY NATIVE PLACE IS MAHARASHTRA BUT MY BIRTH PLACE IS SURAT GUJARAT. MY CASTE IS "HINDU MAHAR".MY EDUCATION STD 1 TO B.A. COMPLETED FROM GUJARAT STATE . SIR I WANT TO SC CERTIFICATE FROM SURAT GUJARAT. I HAVE NO INFROMATION ABOUT THIS, HOW MANY YEARS LEAVING PROOF FOR THIS CERTIFICAT PLEASE INFORM ME IN YEAR ...
Abhinav
04 November 2015 at 06:26
Hello,
I am starting a campsite near pangoot in Nainital. The firm is in partnership with the landowner. I need to know in case I need to change the land usage from agriculture to commercial u/s 143.
Someone suggested that it is not required because the local landowner is partner and it is a tourism business.
Thanks
Abhinav Gupta
9999702666
ASIM
04 November 2015 at 01:48
One West bengal widower childless Hindu dies intestate whose wife has already died before his demise. AT the time of his death he leaves behind a son of predeceased elder brother , a son and a daughter of predeceased elder sister and a living sister having one living daughter .
Who will inherit his immovable property ?
Satyan manuja
03 November 2015 at 23:51
I took a loan from bank and two years back I clear all the loan as advised by bank.
The bank took a fianl amount cheque and transfer the amount from my saving account to my loan account and give me statement of zero balance. afer clearing the loan I asked bank to relaese my plot papers then the bank asked me to deposit the amount for non constrution of house.Before and after bank neither informed me for this type of charges.
Kindly guide what to do in this matter?
Dr.Dhruvit Chaudhari
03 November 2015 at 23:42
Hi.
I'm Dr. Dhruvit Chaudhari.
Please help me out in this matter. And advice .
I've taken education loan(Bank of baroda)
on 2003 for my MEDICAL SCIENCE studies. Till 31/3/2011
My outstanding amount to pay was 1.5 LAC approx. It was considered as NPA SINCE THEN. I'VE got 2 notice from LOk ADALAT FOR loan settlement. I've attended once during March 2015. BANK WANTED ME TO PAY 1.8 LAC ASAP but I've arranged 50k till 31 March 2015. And I agreed to repay asap but they didn't get ready to pay as EMI.
And today on 3 nov 2015 they lien amount of 1.5 LAC from my mother's account without informing her or to me.
So my query is:
1. IS INTEREST COUNTED ON NPA?
2. THEY LIEN MY PARENTS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE TO ME OR MY PARENTS?
3.Can I pay only principle amount only or whole amount with interest? (It's 3.5 LAC approx n I've withdrwed 1.5 LAC only.)
4. Any feasible option?
Thank you.
Anonymous
03 November 2015 at 23:40
Sir,
I need to get some clarity on above matter. And my main querry is
1. Can a lower Court Magistrate grant bail in a criminal case filed under IPC 420 and 406?
2. If a bail application is filed under sec 437 (6) crpc, do the Magistrate carries the power to grant bail? Can u refer any case or mail any order copy for support? ?
Please help. .its very urgent
PRASAD AKS
03 November 2015 at 23:26
MY FATHER A FREEDOM FIGHTER FIGHT FOR INDEPENDENCE. WHEN HE IS IN JAIL ON THOSE DAYS , LOST ALL OF HIS BELONGINGS. TO THESE PEOPLE CENTRAL AND STATE GOVERNMENTS PROVIDED SOME BENEFITS BY WAY OF FREE RAIL PASS AND PENSION EVERY MONTH. TILL 1989 HE ENJOYED AND PASSED AWAY AT HIS AGE OF 80 YEARS. WE ARE 3 BROTHERS AND 2 SISTERS ALL MARRIED. 2 ELDER BROTHERS REACHED MY FATHER AND MOTHER. 1 ELDER SISTER WIDOW. NOW MY QUESTION HERE, PLEASE
1. CAN ELIGIBLE TO FREE RAILWAY PASS TO 64 YRS AGED SON? (Senior citizen common to all)
2. CAN I ELIGIBLE FOR PENSION AS A SON?
3. TO WHOM I APPLY AND WHAT WAY TO APPLY?
4. BOTH SISTERS WHAT BENEFITS GOVERNMENT PROVIDED?
5. WHAT MORE BENEFITS GOVERNMENT PROVIDED?
REQUEST REPLY FROM GREAT PERSONS AND ADVICE'S.
THANKS A LOT
bijoya ghosh
03 November 2015 at 22:45
how to correct names in the birth certificate by way of filing petition in the court.
ssundarpaul
03 November 2015 at 22:20
Agreements needed:
1. Service Agreement for training and Consultancy.
2. Employment Agreement - for employees with our company in various
departments of research and other activities based on detailed terms.
3. Non Disclosure Agreement for 4. Terms of Service for online Services - for our e-book based training courses.
Employees - for those involved in
research and product development.
IF ANY ONE INTEREST TO WORK WITH US SEND ME CONTACT NO :
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Regarding woman share in property
Please refer the bellow Article which taken from a news paper: In this regard I have a question that my mother date of birth is 14.07.1962 and my question is she can get share in her mother property, Her mother still alive.
The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, originally did not give daughters inheritance rights in ancestral property. They could only ask for a right to sustenance from a joint Hindu family. But this disparity was removed by an amendment to the Act on September 9, 2005. The apex court judgment has now added another disqualification for women regarding their right of inheritance. Until now, they could not ask for a share if the property had been alienated or partitioned before December 20, 2004, the date the Bill was introduced. This judgment makes it imperative for the father to have been alive when the amendment came into force. Settling the law in the wake of a clutch of appeals arising out of high court judgments, a bench of Justices Anil R Dave and Adarsh K Goel recently held that the date of a daughter becoming coparcener (having equal right in an ancestral property) is “on and from the commencement of the Act”. The bench overruled the view taken by some high courts that the amendment being a gender legislation that aimed at according equal rights to the daughter in ancestral property by removing discrimination, should be applied retrospectively. Interpreting statutory provisions, the top court shot down the argument that a daughter acquires right by birth, and even if her father had died prior to the amendment, the shares of the parties were required to be redefined. “The text of the amendment itself clearly provides that the right conferred on a ‘daughter of a coparcener’ is ‘on and from the commencement’ of the amendment Act. In view of plain language of the statute, there is no scope for a different interpretation than the one suggested by the text,” it said. Further, there is neither any express provision for giving retrospective effect to the amended provision nor necessary intent, noted the court, adding “even a social legislation cannot be given retrospective effect unless so provided for or so intended by the legislature”. About applicability of the amendment to the daughters born before it was brought, the bench held that the new law would apply irrespective of the date of birth. “All that is required is that the daughter should be alive and her father should also be alive on the date of the amendment,” it said. The court also held that alienation of ancestral property, including its partition, which may have taken place before December 20, 2004, in accordance with the law applicable at that time, would remain unaffected by the 2005 amendment, and those partitions can no longer be reopened by daughters. - See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/supreme-court-sets-2005-cut-off-on-women-right-to-ancestral-property