Rohit
13 April 2016 at 23:24
I have purchased new property in fursungi pune which come under grampanchayat .after one year builder is demanding for drainage connection charges. he is saying that It is a part of property tax. What should i do??
Swapnil
13 April 2016 at 23:21
sir
what is rti application fees in Maharashtra
as per my knowledge old was Rs. 10/- whether any change in this fees ?
RTI u/s 6(1) application Form use for Maharashtra
pls clear
Swapnil
13 April 2016 at 23:04
sir
on 31.03.16 HC judge passed one order in criminal matter but same is yet not uploaded on website
what is time limit for uploading the same...
what steps taken to receive order (copy) at the earliest.
pls guide
Jason
13 April 2016 at 22:42
I had joined railway service as C&MA GR-I on 29-06-2000. ( scale 5500- 9000). I got promotion as C&MS GR-II on 27/02/2008. ( scale 6500-10500 ) .After 6th CPC , C&MS GR-II is merged with next higher grade C&MS GR-I and changed the design as C&MS. Now I am working in that .
Now my query is When I will get my MACP.
Ritesh Rathod
13 April 2016 at 22:38
Dear sir, I borrow 2.5 laks from my friend at a rate of 5 perc. But he execute one agreement stating that I borrow 4 laks for doing business and borrower will pay the said amount with in 6 month. After 1 yrs now he demand for 6 lakh and I m ready to pay 2.5 as that I actually borrow.
Advice me. Creditor threaten me by saying that he file a sue I m a govt. Employee. Plz help me out
Rastogi
13 April 2016 at 22:30
My father filed a suit for permanent injunction. The suit was mortged to defendant and redeemed. Redemption deed was not registered. Original mortgage deed is also lost by us. Permanent injunction was granted subject to redemption of mortgage money. In first appeal permanent injunction was confirmed and also upheld redemption of mortgage. Defendant filled some additional documents which was not considered by first appeal.The suit is remanded by high Court to first appellate to consider additional documents.
Now when we took Encumbrance certificate for last 50 years we noted that the property was mortgaged again to different person after redemption with defendant.
We never (plaintiff) never submitted this document and in written statement second mortgage was not mentioned. We only mentioned in written statement that property is redeemed from defendant and we are in possession.
Can we submit Encumbrance certificate as additional documents now which will prove the property is redeemed.
Since the high Court remanded case back first appellate to consider additional documents submitted by defendant, can plaintiff also submit additional injunction now?
Katta Jagadish
13 April 2016 at 21:40
We were 9 accused in a case , A1 , A5 , A6, A9 filed discharge petition under 239 Crpc and the Trail sessions Judge rejected their Plea and ordered for framing for charge .
As it stood thus the four aggrieved accused knocked the high court doors under recessional powers and the High court had admitted the case and Lcr were called for .By then A3 had filed a 482 to quash the proceedings as the FIR was contrary to law as it is SECOND fir and is not persimible under law as Lalitha Kumari , Anju Choudary , Amith Shah and others as held by Supreme court .The High court allowed the petition of accused 3 As it stood thus the Criminal revision petition was moved by the one of the accused on the ground the Fir being held bad in law they may be discharged from the case . can the remaining accused file a petetion under 239 as they were not heard or should they oppose charge under 240 CRPC . Any citations regarding this welcome please
M.KOMBAI MUTHU
13 April 2016 at 20:31
Moot Court Problem
Mr. X & Y were arrested in connection with crime no 123/15 registered by the AB Police station for the offence punishable under section 34 of Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 and under Section 79- 80 Karnataka Police Act 1963 & read with section N D P S Act, 1985, Mr. X& Y, were released on bail by the I. ACCM, Bangalore. Investigation of the case has not been completed & final report under section 173 of CrPC has not been submitted.
After granting bail to Mr. X& Y, The I ACCM, Bengaluru adjourned the case to 1.1.2016. On that day, Mr. X & Y, who are the permanent resident of Maharashtra, did not appear before the I ACCM; Bengaluru After noticing the absence of Mr. X & Y (Accused no 1&2). The Trial court issued Non-bail able Arrest warrant to secure and produce them before the court on the next date of hearing on 2.5.2016
The Accused 1& 2 (X & Y) have challenged the order of NBW by filing the criminal petition no 114/2016 before the Hon’able High Court of Karnataka on the following grounds.
1. The Accused No 1& 2 need not appear before the I ACCM, Bangalore, before submission of charge sheet and before cognizance is taken and process is issued. Hence, issue of NBW is in violation and Article 21 of COI.
2. The state Public Prosecutor contends that as there is reasonable ground to proceed against Accused 1 & 2, they must appear before the Court even after bail granted on certain conditions.
[Note: The students must keep in mind the provision of section 154 & 173 (2) of CrPC]
[NDPS Act 1985, the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substance Act]
Draft Memorial and argue the Matter either on behalf of the Accused or Prosecution.
My mail id : baskarvideo@gmail.com
Cell 9442803036
Mohd Maqsood
13 April 2016 at 20:17
in muslim law any difference between ancestral property and self acquire property?
while selling or transferring it
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Love marriage
Dear sir,
I have applied for marriage 2years back, due to Rong information from my boy friends mother has given that my son is mad and also stupide reason & stoped our marriage, Bt we both r still in contact , can we apply again for the marriage. Or pls let me know wat we have to do for the same.