P.C. Joshi
03 October 2016 at 13:41
Dear Friends,
I booked a 2BDR flat in Noida Extension in Sep 2012 and now I have got the letter for fit out/possession. The builder has sent me demand letter in which he has charged me Rs 40000 towards interest @ 18% on delay of various payments.I have checked and found that in builder has ignored the delay caused by bank who has finnaced me as the disbursement was delayed by bank for want of some formalities to be fulfilled by by the builders. then there was a delay due to wrong demands sent and the builder has ignored the transit delay.
I want to know whether is any point if i file a consumer complaint against the demand of interest on the following points.
1. Delay caused by bank
2. Transit priod has not been considered in computaion.
3. Challenge the rate of interest
4. Why not the builder has claimed the interest when the delay was caused or even not charged the arrers of interest in the subsquent demand letter. Some of the interest is time barred(ie. more than 3 years)and builder is taking undue advantage now at the time of possession and not giving NOC without clearance of interest demand.
5. Already caused due to recession in the property price and builder is causing extra burdon.
Please advise whether it is worthwhile to file a complaint in a consumer court.
Thanks
P.C. Joshi
Pooja
03 October 2016 at 13:29
I have a small confusion with regard to the scope of body warrant issyed by the magistrate under section 267 of Cr.P.C it is so happened that one accused is arrested and produced in 307 case and remanded to judicial custody susequently police sought his body warrant in another crime which is under 387 of IPC and he has been produced in that too and police filed chargesheet against him in that. susequently he released on bail from the second offence and the first case was still pending and he was remanded to judicial custody. later on the while the second case hearing date was there the accused couldnt attend the court as he was in judicial custody with other offence and the court issued NBW against him, it is after some hearing date in the second case court again issued body warrant to the accused by requisition of the police and on that body warrant he has not produced before the court, in the mean time accused got the bail in the offence under section 307 of IPC and release intimation has been sent to the jail but the jail authority is declained to set him free as the body warrant is pending against him.it is pertinent to note here is that the central prison in which he is detained is 600 KM far away from the court and its been 5 moths that the jail authority havent produced them before the court only the reason they give is lack of escorts. i tried to file an application to recall the body warrant but the magistrate declined to appriciate it telling ther is no provision in Cr.P.C to recall the body warrant like 70(2) for the NBW. at this juncture what am i supposed to do whether the jail authority empowered to declain from relesing him with the reason that body warrant is pending against him..? it is very expensive for the party to efford Habeous corpus as karnataka H.C is 400 KM far from our place. is there any settled law with regard to this ...? please do suggest
Member (Account Deleted)
03 October 2016 at 12:47
Can any one help me in downloading free sample papers of past 10 years of Delhi Judiciary and Haryana Judiciary exams in pdf form or if anyone having, kindly provide.
Please advise as i have only marksheets of all three years of LLB degree and degree certificate is yet to be obtained from University so am i eligible to apply for judiciary exams or to wait till the receipt of degree certificate.
Also please confirm the eligibility except qualification to appear for judiciary exams.
praveen
03 October 2016 at 12:42
I applied for a job in uttar pradesh public service commission in feb 2014 and written exam was held in 2014 . In July 2015 I joined a central government job on regular basis . In November 2015 UPPSC invited eligibility checking form from shortlisted candidates . In that form I did not mentioned my current job bcz my boss told me it is not necessary bcz I applied before joining the job . After receiving eligibility checking form uppsc will shortlist once again and call for interview . If I am called for interview should I mention my job in interview form or not .
pravin jadahav
03 October 2016 at 12:03
my grandparent has purchased land back 46 yrs ago on which kul kayda 43 was mentioned,so how to remove that kul kayda.
land is in maharashtra
S Singh
03 October 2016 at 11:02
My uncle died 1 year ago leaving power of attorney in favour of his fifth child. Can the fifth child now sell the property on the basis of aforementioned P. O. A. ?
N M Prasad
03 October 2016 at 10:38
Respected sir,
I am working in government of India on a diploma engineering qualification, during my services i had acquired higher education in and obtained my graduation with out the consent of my department since they rejected my request.
But i moved on my education and applied for Group A services as deputy collector and had qualified for the final interview.
During interview it is said to bring NOC from current working government organization to attend the interview.
I am expecting to be get selected so,
My Query is:
1. How should i put forward my request for NOC from my current organization ?
2. If they deny to give NOC should i Resign and move forward for my interview?
Pls. Kindly guide sir,
mahendra rai jain
03 October 2016 at 08:44
Can any individual appoint, HUF as his power of attorney
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Civil
Dear sir, Sir, I am trying to redeem my father's property from the clutches of land grabbers, for the past 30 years. This is the last chance given by god. 1. I am the Respondent / Judgement debtor in a title suit. The suit was decreed against me in the year 1987. Agreed over the judgment and decree I filed a second appeal before the Madras high court, which was dismissed on 13.08.2002 to my dismay. 2. The decree holder along with his 4 legal heirs sold the suit property on 27.07.2000, lis pendency of the second appeal. Simultaneously, on the same date & time (i.e., on 27.07.2000) the D,Hr. and his 4 sons executed a power deed in favor of the purchaser of the above suit property. The D.Hr. without disclosing the above material facts to the court filed an Execution Petition on 20.03.2003. On that day, the D.Hr. has no interest in the property as it has been already sold. 3. Please note Sir, the purchaser of the suit property without disclosing either his purchase or execution of a power deed in his favour, filed an EA in the year 2003, praying to allow him to pursue the EP proceedings on behalf of the decree holder by a Special Power of Attorney. The court had allowed him to continue the EP proceedings as a Special Power of Attorney. 4. On 26-12-2015, the decree holder died. Without disclosing the death of the decree holder, the Power agent obtained order from the court to take delivery of the property during March, 2016. 5. On 8-4-2016, the Judgment debtor filed a memo before the court informing about the death of the decree holder. It was left to the J.Ds. to bring to the notice of the court that the decree holder is dead. 6. Sensing the seriousness, now the purchaser/power agent filed petition under Order III Rule 1 & 2 of CPC r/w section 151 of CPC to permit the power of attorney to continue the EP proceedings as legal representatives of the deceased decree holder, by virtue of the Power Deed executed on 27.07.2000. And he filed one more petition under Order 21 Rule 16 of the CPC to permit the power agent to pursue the EP filed by the deceased decree holder as a transferee of tile by operation of law, by virtue of the sale deed executed on 27.07.2000. Both of the above said Power deed and Sale deed have not seen light of the day for the past 17 years. 7. Now, we want clarification on the following points, Sir: (1) Whether the legal heirs of the deceased decree holder can execute the decree even now as the deceased decree holder and his legal heirs already sold the property to third party i.e., the present power agent before seventeen years? (1) Does the power alleged have been given by the deceased decree holder and his four sons on 27.07.2000 empower the petitioner/ Special power agent to seek recognition even now? (2) Does the alleged Sale deed said to be executed by the deceased decree holder and his four sons on 27.07.2000; even after seventeen years empower the purchaser/power agent to continue the EP proceedings as a transferee of title by operation of Law? . Hence, I earnestly solicit your kind legal advice in this matter Sir.