Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

royal falcon   28 October 2016 at 19:22

Crpc 107/116

what is crpc 107/116.

jiteshjain   28 October 2016 at 18:25

Scrutiny of income tax

Hello All,

My freind Pratik is under going an scrutiny from Income Tax. The case is as follows:

His uncle started a business on his name of Diamond Trading in Surat. For the Business his uncle opened a Bank account in Axis Bank for the Financial Year 2011-12. He was just adviced to sign blank cheques and other activity of business was carried out by his uncle. He nither knew about what was happening about that business. When he received his Income Tax return the turnover was 100cr. in which the profits was only 4 Lakhs shown. Now, from last 1 and half years he was receiving notice from Income Tax to present the Sales and Purchase Register and Bank Statement. He contacted the uncle but uncle was not available at that moment.
Uncle adviced directly to visit the CA who had audited his accounts but CA refused to attend the notice on behalf of him. He contacted the orginal party who did all the transactions on his name. They also did not entertained him. At last he appointed a new CA to attend the Case. They both went to the Assesing Officer and informed him orally about the whole story. The AO issued 133(6) summon to the orginal party and the Bank to provide the details of my freind. As soon as the notice was received by the original party and the CA both became active and CA summited all Purchase and Sales register and Bank statements but that my friend had given him for submission. The AO asked for Letter of Authority from the CA but he didn't had the same and left. AO called my friend and told to give statement in written for the whole story but my friend did not submitted and left from his office as his new CA adviced not to submit because if the orginal party did not accept the case then all the liabilty would be transfered to pratik.
AO wanted to close the case by 31st Mar 2015 but was unable to do. In this Case the AO is not agreeing with the calculation of Profit Margin which is shown as 0.04% on the total turnover. AO says the profit should be atleat 4% on the total turnover rather than 0.04%

Please advise now what action should pratik take as he is innocent on the case and do not want any further liability.

Currently the Case is under an appeal in Income Tax but my friend has not attended the appeal. 2 Hearing were called out. for the same. Can any one advise what can he do now for saving himself.
Is there any possibility under Law to book a case against his uncle for this fraud.

Anonymous   28 October 2016 at 16:49

Custody rights of 1.5 year old

Hello. My husband, son and i live in an apartment. My in laws live about 40mins away. My husband is threatening me that he will take my 1.4 year old son and go live with his parents. We visit his parents regularly. Now they want the grand child to live with them. We had a love marriage and so we don't have a great relationship. Can he take my child away? Should I apply for custody rights of the child? If yes how do I go about it? His family is rich and have a lot of influence. Please help.

raman gaikwad   28 October 2016 at 16:40

D.v. act

what should a husband do if the wife is not present in the court in the last 6 hearings in a domestic violence case?

SUHAS   28 October 2016 at 16:06

Apartment with deviation

Hi Sir,

i am planning to buy a flat in Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore.
Currently Land is 'A' Khatha with land size 40*60[2400 SqFt]
Builder got approval from BBMP for G+3 construction and approved 1 flat per floor with 1500 SqFt.

But builder has constructed 2 flats per floor with extra 1000 SqFt.
Is it ok to buy? or its too much deviation?

Do we get alteast 'B' Khatha for this.

LIC HFL ready to provide loan also.

please suggest..

Thanks,
Suhas

Nandini   28 October 2016 at 15:28

Builder took money and not returning

Hi,

We booked a plot on JUNE-2015 in Aarya Ventures(now renamed as Aadya properties) they took 1lakh Rs as booking amount after 3 months they took another 9 lakhs of amount by cheque for sale agreement after 3 months of this we are suppose to go for registration. We started calling builder sale person his name is Ganesh for Registration they kept on postponing it.Then we came to know that there is a dispute on the land and we asked details from the builders and they kept on promising that will get resolve soon..We waited till 1 year and finally we canceled the booking and asked them to refund. Till now we didn't get single rupee from them, they don't receive our call.

Please suggest me what are the ways available to get our money back.

vijay   28 October 2016 at 15:08

Ancestral property dispute

Hello every one ,my get and father has 50 acres of land which was inherited from his grandfather .He has five sons 3rd one is my father.In 1995 he registered 5 acres of land to my cousin brother ie (my fathers elder brothers elder son)after then he substituted 45 acres of land towards 5 sons that means my father lost one acre .This property is located near Hyderabad now it costs more than 50 lakh, is my father or me have any chance to acquire one acre according to law.

Raj   28 October 2016 at 15:04

Error on order

Sir,
Special Leave Petition was files by me, in perosn, challenging the interim order of High Court.Initally stay was granted on the interim order. The High court has granted as sine dine after receiving the stay order. After 1 year, the Supreme Court dismissed my Special Leave Petition. In Record of proceedings/Order, it was written as “SLP arises from the “FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT dated 15.08.2014 in CRM NO XXXX�. Review Petition was filed specifying that there is error on records of proceedings by specifying that SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION ARISING OUT FROM INTERIM ORDER DATED 15.08.2014 IN CRM NO XXXX� But the Hon’ble Court dismiss the Review Petition summarily.
In such situation, what is the remedy left to correct the Supreme Court Order?

Kumar Soni   28 October 2016 at 14:58

Where can i find the original order of court?

Where can i find the order of equal salary
by the honorable court made on 25.10.2016.

vijay   28 October 2016 at 14:47

Dispute on ancestral property

Hi every one, we have ancestral property of about 50acres in rangareddy distric..This property is inherited from our fore fathers .My grand fathers father has two sons ie my grand father and one another brother .My grand fathers brother was mentally handicapped person .Every one used to beat him with stones in village on those days.Because of mentally handicapped my great grand father made entire 50 acre property towards my grand father .My grand fathers brother who was mentally handicapped was married in his adult age but his wife was given divorce with in few years because of mentally unfit. But she gave birth to one girl child when she gave divorce.Divorce was not given legally.Every has as a suspect that the child was born not by my grand father .
After giving divorce she married to another person and left the daughter in her mothers home and went away very far from our native place.In 1982 my grand father who was mentally handicapped was died .she has given birth to two sons with her second husband .Now she is alive but she don't have any relation ship with the daughter or her parents she was completely quit every one.
Now the problem is the daughter who she born to our mentally handicapped grand father ie suspect women is asking 50 percent share in our ancestral property as our grand father got.
She is asking according to hindhu succession act 2005
She is saying she will submit DNA to court
In revenue records from 1950 on wards the entire property in my grand father name itself.
No single record is there towards her and not even a single I'd
Here my question is if DNA is proved current then she will get share in our property or not
Whether hindhu succession act 2005 will applicable in this case.if DNA is proved correct
What percent does court consider DNA report
Being my grand father died in 1982 this case is possible
Being he was mentally handicapped is this case possible to opponent.
Please sujjest me ur valuable answers
Thanks �ards
Vijay