LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Deep   22 February 2017 at 11:26

Road accident case under 279, 338 & 134(a)(b)

Hi I want to know time limit for RTO inspection and time limit for which car can be kept in custody of police station.

Actual facts..
I met an accident with my activa bike which hit an old lady causing her facture in leg. After accident I took her to hospital and called her relatives. Then left for my classes after leaving them in hospital. As hospital was not admitting her for operation her relatives said its case of road accident to admit her in urgent basis (emergency room). Afterwards police came to hospital and asked for statement, they did not give any statement and said that they do not want to file any case. Next day police came to my classes in search of me and called me to police station. In police station they took my driving licence, bike papers (insurance, bill and rc all in xerox), bike keys and bike in their custody for RTO inspection, they handed me a notice and said i have been booked with police case under section 279, 338 and 134(a)(b).
My question is
1. What is the validity of the police case without patient's FIR .?
2. And time limits for rto inspection as asked above. It has been 3 days my bike is still in police station.
3. Is there any further procedure and formalities?

Upendra   22 February 2017 at 11:19

Filing defence evidence - private expert opnion

respected lawyers,
i am accuced 1 in 498a case "cc430/09 in Additional Junior Civil Judge, Addanki, andhra Pradesh."
sineario:
pw1 has stated i had traveled from chennai to her maternal home on 13/1/2009 and threatned her & her father for aditional dowry
i have summoned attendance register from the college where i was working in my defence,(i am no longer working there)
attendance has my initals on said date,
procetution during cross of DW1 asked a leading question that the initals of said date differ from my other initals, for which DW1 answered " it seems so, but he is not sure"
to support my evidence i obtained court certified copies of attendance sheets and obtained expert opnion from truth labs chennai that "the initals of the said date agree consistantly with other accepted initals"

now APP is objecting to accepting as evidence the expert opnion submited by me

i am requesting to you learned experts for your esteemed Counsel in the following queries
1) can APP object to defence filing evidence
if yes to what extent
if no how can i object her interferences (under which clause)
2) can private expert opnion be accepted atleast as secondary evidence (APP's main objection is that expert opnion is from private person & not gov forensic labs.)
if yes is there any supreme court judjements which have used private expert opnion. kindly help
3)i belive there is a supreme court judgement that stressed " all evidence has to be accepted & if they are irrelevent they may not be used while passing judgement" i saw the judgement while browsing net few years ago, now i am not able to locate it despite my earnest effort, kindly help me with any link for such citations
4) under which claused can i plead my need to add my evidence into the list

thanking you for your valuble advise
upendra

ravi gupta   22 February 2017 at 11:17

Weather mutually physical relation is amount to rape

Dear Experts,
i am married and working as senior level officer in MNC before five month i had physical relation with my female assistant mutually. however i never lied and promised to marry her. but now she is threatening me to leave my wife and marry with her. she admit that if i don't marry her she will file the case of rape against me as first promised for marry only to be physical with her and later denied for marry. since i never promised to marry her it all was verbally hence i have not any concrete evidence for the same that i had promised to marry her or she is lie. pls clarify in this case can she file the rape case against me if so how to get out of this problem any remedies?

regds
Amit

Member (Account Deleted)   22 February 2017 at 11:02

Stamp duty payable on issue of share certificate

One Company in West Bengal has to issue share-certificate.Can any one tell me,what is the stamp duty payable in that state for issue of Share-certificate?

Anonymous   22 February 2017 at 10:24

Gumast licence

Hi Experts,

Greetings for the day.

I want to start business as propriator where I will buy products from someone /manufacturer and sell it under my name(online/offline).
And in future I have plan to manufacture the same product.

Please help me with which type of gumasta licence ie shop, commercial or other and anyother documentation required to start business.

Thanks in advance.

Ravindra.

S.D. Singh   22 February 2017 at 06:45

N.I. Act jurisdiction

I filed a n.i. act complaint with court of wrong jurisdiction I.e. my bank account was maintained at different branch, but I taken it at different branch by mistake, therefore the jurisdiction of court was different. Summon have been issued by the incorrect jurisdictional court. Whether it would create any problem to me. How I can I rectify , if required. whether I should shift my account to the branch which is mentioned in the complaint.

Syed Sadiq Hussain   22 February 2017 at 00:02

Question law is left open

SLP (CIVIL)

ad   21 February 2017 at 23:43

Settlement and 498a

Sir, my wife filed various cases against me and my family members. Now we agreed for mutual divorce on an amount. She is ready to cooperate in 498a. I am an govt. Employee and my promotion case is under sealed cover.
And promotion and financial benefits will provide only on acqutal on merit.
If there is benefit of doubt or acqutal on lack of evidence then no financial benefits will allowed to me.
My wife's chief is completed and her cross examination is closed due to absent of her.
Please suggest what should iIdo.
Whether she will hostile and if yes will decision allowed me acqutal on merit. Or I should go high Court for quash of 498a.pl. Suggest. If high Court quash 498a what will be there in its decision.
Regards
Ravindra

aslamskhan   21 February 2017 at 22:06

3months salary

Respected lawyers/expertd,
pls find notepad pasted copy of the same and sorry for the previous not attached.
pls interrogate and advice.







Back













Labour, Mumbai
Case DetailsCase Type : Ref-IDA - Reference
Filing Number: 5100951/2014Filing Date: 19-07-2014
Registration Number: 5100176/2014Registration Date: 25-07-2014
CNR Number: MHLC01-001301-2014


Case Status

First Hearing Date : 25th July 2014
Next Hearing Date: 06th March 2017
Stage of Case: Evidence
Court Number and Judge : 6-Judge


Petitioner and Advocate1) Ms Jindal GSL Pvt. Ltd.
Address - Worli Mum. 18
Advocate- BHAT


Respondent and Advocate1) Aslam Khan
Address - Aminbad No. 36 Daulat Nagar Mumbra Dit Thane 400 612
Advocate - GEORGE MATHEW


Acts

Under Act(s)

Under Section(s)

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 12(5)

History of Case Hearing



Registration Number

Judge

Business On Date

Hearing Date

Purpose of hearing

5100176/2014 Judge 12-11-2014 30-12-2014 Report
5100176/2014 Judge 30-12-2014 21-01-2015 Report
5100176/2014 Judge 21-01-2015 23-02-2015 Report
5100176/2014 Judge 23-02-2015 17-03-2015 Report
5100176/2014 Judge 17-03-2015 28-04-2015 Report
5100176/2014 Judge 28-04-2015 22-06-2015 Report
5100176/2014 Judge 22-06-2015 01-07-2015 Report
5100176/2014 Judge 01-07-2015 29-07-2015 Written Statement
5100176/2014 Judge 29-07-2015 26-08-2015 Written Statement
5100176/2014 Judge 26-08-2015 14-09-2015 Written Statement
5100176/2014 Judge 14-09-2015 21-09-2015 Written Statement
5100176/2014 Judge 21-09-2015 28-10-2015 Written Statement
5100176/2014 Judge 28-10-2015 30-10-2015 Issues
5100176/2014 Judge 30-10-2015 24-11-2015 Issues
5100176/2014 Judge 24-11-2015 12-01-2016 Issues
5100176/2014 Judge 12-01-2016 10-02-2016 Issues
5100176/2014 Judge 10-02-2016 09-03-2016 Evidence
5100176/2014 Judge 09-03-2016 17-03-2016 Evidence
5100176/2014 Judge 17-03-2016 29-03-2016 Evidence
5100176/2014 Judge 29-03-2016 26-04-2016 Evidence
5100176/2014 Judge 26-04-2016 15-06-2016 Evidence
5100176/2014 Judge 15-06-2016 08-07-2016 Evidence
5100176/2014 Judge 08-07-2016 22-08-2016 Evidence
5100176/2014 Judge 22-08-2016 05-10-2016 Evidence
5100176/2014 Judge 05-10-2016 08-11-2016 Evidence
5100176/2014 Judge 08-11-2016 13-12-2016 Evidence
5100176/2014 Judge 13-12-2016 11-01-2017 Evidence
5100176/2014 Judge 11-01-2017 30-01-2017 Evidence
5100176/2014 Judge 30-01-2017 11-02-2017 Evidence
5100176/2014 Judge 11-02-2017 06-03-2017 Evidence






































































sudhakar   21 February 2017 at 20:42

Absolute saledeed holds rights or unregistered agreement hol

Dear Sir
In the month of June 2016 I have purchased a flat and got registered same. I was in position since that and got my Khatha transfered ,paid online tax update.
Last week the property ( flat ) owner passed away,,, after two days few strange persons came and questioned about my flat details.
After checking EC , in which my name is reflecting .
Now they claim ,,,they have filed case in court as they have agreement (unregistered)from the person who sold to me ( passed away recently).
My question is wen I bought this flat I checked all legal documents and EC ,taken legal opinion and bank loan. Now they claim there was financial transaction in between the person who sold the flat to me, and he has given agreement that flat are belong to them.
Kindly suggest me how to proceed . I have paid full stamp duty and full consideration has paid through bank, got sale deed , Khatha .


Kindly suggest