Munish Kumar
03 July 2017 at 16:40
MY FATHER DIED 3 YEARS AGO.THEY DID NOT WRITE HIS WILL. WE ARE TWO BROTHERS NOW WE WANT TO DO THE PROPERTY IN NAME OF MY MOTHER. WHAT SHOULD WE DO TO DO THIS
Sunil Kumar
03 July 2017 at 14:23
R/Sir,
With due respect it is intimated that my deceased father had made a will in the year 2005 in the name of three brothers and the will is not registered. my one relative has requested in the Muncipal Committee, Kaithal to add three brothers name in the official record of the Municipal Committee, Kaithal and Municipal Committee has issued an assessment copy in which three brothers name mentioned but when I visit the O/o Municipal Committee, Kaithal for payment of House Tax and the Municipal Committee has issued a payment receipt of House Tax in the name of my deceased father but according to assessment copy three brothers name have mentioned.
Kindly suggest what type of document formalities have to be done for house partition in the official record and how to remove my deceased father name in the Municipal Committee, Kaithal.
John
03 July 2017 at 13:43
I am a Christian. My mother passed away and owns a flat. I am the only son. My aunty claims that my mother has gifted the property to her and I don't have any right for the property. Kindly suggest the way forward.
Aditya Dev
03 July 2017 at 13:05
Can the plaintiff file additional documents after the issues have been framed. I am unable to find a judgement which lays down the law to this effect. Only adhoc judgments based on facts have been passed.
I would appreciate if anyone can name a judgment which lays down as law that additional documents cannot be filed after the stage of framing of issues.
Shilpa Mani
03 July 2017 at 12:51
My father in law is to inherit an property from his father. A suit was filed by my mother in law against two brothers of my father in law who refused to give his share after the death of my father in law. My mother in law along with her 2 sons and 5 daughters as petitioners contested the case and a pre degree was issued stating that my mother in law and heirs have share in the ancestral property.
Since my mother in law was passed away last year, her daugheters contested the case without the knowledge of the sons. Finnally when the two sons came to know abt the case, it reached to the level where a advocate commission was issued partioning the property among three and judgement to be passed in few days. Two sons are not satisfied with the property allocated in the commission report.
Is there anyway to stop the judgement.
Note: The Lawyer appointed by my mother in law runs the case with the 5 daughters and not ready to listen to our words. He is keen in finishing the case with that single property as in commission report.
Please provide us some suggestion as the next /final hearing is on 5th july. Just one day in between
pushpakrishna
03 July 2017 at 12:49
Dear experts
WE filed a suit for specific performance of a plot on agreement of sale and won the suit.the defendants filed an appeal in the district court and the same is allowed and we preferred a second appeal in the high court.the same is pending for admission as they filed caveat as soon as their appeal is allowed in the district courtbefore the high court and hence we filed second appeal .now it is pending for admission before the high court.
Now they want to sell the plot saying that as there is no stay at high court.our .kindly give the suitable advice on this.
In the high court they appointed an advocate also on their behalf
Thanking you experts in advance.
Mihir Joglekar
03 July 2017 at 12:38
Dear Sir / Madam,
I understand that as per Recent Changes in MCS Act, 1960 and Bye Laws of Cooperative Housing Society U/s: 73CB Co-option not allowed. But, Managing Committee Members are still allowing Co-opt Member to attend Managing Committee Meetings. What necessary steps / action can be taken about / against this issue ?
Regards,
Mihir Joglekar
Kavya B Shashidhar
03 July 2017 at 11:48
Question: When an application to advance a particular case is made under section 151 of CPC, what are the circumstances when the said application NEED NOT BE SERVED on the opposite party?
Greetings,
In a certain case of permanent injunction wherein an interim order was granted, an advance application was made by me. The said case was for first hearing. Due to a technical error, an advance application was made before the court believing the case is at summons stage. So copies were not served to the opposite counsels.
Subsequently on the next date the court ordered that copies be served on the opposite counsel. Now on approaching them, they refuse to acknowledge the application submitted by us.
Any help on how to proceed further with this case would be very much appreciated.
Thank you.
-Regards
Kavya
Shreya Kodmur
03 July 2017 at 11:25
In case A , B, C are brothers having Ancestral property being used for conducting as the place of business of the Firm. A and B being the partners of the firm including another 3 other partners. The rent has not been paid by the firm as no clause was mentioned in the partnership deed. And the partners continued to use the property as the place of business for more than 15 years. On dissolution, how do you account it? Rent to be paid to both partners or all 3 brothers? Or not to be considered as there is no profit?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Want to file crpc 127
My husband has marital affair and leaved me with my 18 months daughter. We are living with my parents.
I have filed cr pc 125 under which court has ordered rs 1500 only for maintenance which is not sufficient for survival for me and my daughter, and my husband is working in private company at the reputed post and getting a salary of Rs 60000 p/m.
I want to file cr pc 127 but my lawyer said it can be filed only on the date of hearing of crpc 125 as it is the first hearing. The hearing date is too far.
Pls advice