Anonymous
26 July 2017 at 16:40
Dear Sir/Madam,
Good Afternoon to all, Hope you all doing well.
I am Grand-Mother went missing since 26 July 2004 and those who eventually heard her not heard her in last 13 years of journey. My grandfather also died natural death in year 2005.
My father with other natural legal heirs like her son & daughter filed Civil suit into District court for declaration of her death after 7 years of her missing report. Civil court rejected the matter since no one was there in opposition and cited reason that they don't have judicatory to decide on the matter & even review was rejected into district court.
We decided to appeal into high court and made party to state government ( As they refused to remove name of my grand mother who went missing from 7/12 with-out civil court orders). Recently high court disposed the appeal and guided file fresh case by making State government as opposition party and take appeal again to district court.
Now since she is missing since last 13 years, we have below two problems in-front of us and need your expert suggestion on the matter.
1. What is the way ahead for us to make appeal into District court as same has been already rejected?
2. Is there any way by which we can get her name removed from property owner-ship so we can sell this property to third person?
Request your input. Thanks. Sorry I may not be knowing exact legal word while framing above draft.
Regards
DILIP KUMAR SEN
26 July 2017 at 16:13
My Company is purchasing agricultural Land from farmers. During registration it is found that Actual transaction value is lower than Circle value and is paid stamp duty on circlet value. Now my point is that the difference of transaction value and circle value will come under Income Tax from undisclosed source and will be taxed. This quite a fictitious assumption by Income Tax authority.
My question is that 1) How this draconian rule can be avoided ? 2) How I can prove my genuine transaction at present market rate ? 3) What precautions should I adopt to prove my genuine purchase and avoid Income Tax liability?
aastha sharan
26 July 2017 at 15:55
what are the laws governing the digital signature in India?
I am aware of the IT act provisions, and the evidence act provisons but here is the query.
"Section 47A, says when the court has to form an opinion as to the digital signature or any person, the opinion of the certifying authority which has issued the Digital Signature Certificate is a relevant fact. It means while drawing the conclusion, court gives the weight of the digital signature as a relevant fact."
-in the above. who is the certifying authority? is there a list?
-also, is a agreement based on digital signature, binding? how?
-what is the government affiliation on this?
Vivek Kumar
26 July 2017 at 15:26
Sir
I am a resident of Jamshedpur, Jharkhand and I have SC Certificate from Munger, Bihar (My Birth Place). Signed by DM. The certificate is hand written dated 26th Sept 1997.
Whether this certificate will be accepted in Govt Job? I am going to have an interview for SBI PO within a month.
satyam
26 July 2017 at 14:06
Dear all,
I started working in a company and i left the job after a month and i told them that i am suffering from fever so m unable to join and after 6 days i resigned through mail but they didn't replied..and at the time of joining they took a blank cheque from me as a security. And i was on probation period.
And their terms for probation period are: You will be on probation period for 6 months and your services are liable to be terminated by either side without assigning any reason and/or without any notice or without any payment in lieu of notice.
(According to my offer letter)
Now they put cheque on bank for recovery and they are saying you are absconded that's why we are recovering the amount.
Now what should i do even i have resigned after a week from the day i stopped going to office. Currently i have stopped their cheque. Is it possible that they may take any legal action against me?
Darshan Gosalia
26 July 2017 at 13:21
I am a resident of Mumbai. My grandfather had nominated my grandmother for the immovable property in the nature of flat in a co-operative housing society owned by him. My grandfather passed away last month. Now, we have submitted the documents required for the flat to be transferred to my grandmother as required by Maharashtra State Co-op Act, Rules and Bye Laws (Bye law No 34). However, the housing society claims that my grandmother, being a nominee, can be admitted only as a nominee member. She can act only as a trustee of the said flat. Hence, she cannot sale the said flat. The Act mentions that on death, the property shall be transferred to the nominee. It no where mentions that the member should be made a nominee member. By the term 'transfer', I understand that on transfer, the transferee shall have the absolute right over the said flat to deal in any manner as she deems fit. I would like to know whether the society's contention is true to make my grandmother a nominee-member? If so, to what extent? What other procedure should be followed to make my grandmother a full-member from the current nominee-member? Can a housing society restrict a member's right to sale the said flat? Is the flat 'transferred' or is it 'transmitted' on death of the member? If it is 'transmitted' what are the legal differences from 'transfer'?
Anonymous
26 July 2017 at 13:06
Sir/Madam.
I am a Law Student(BBA LLB) & wanted to pursue 3 years CA degree after completion of Law course.
It would be very helpful, if you suggest me about addmition regardings in 3yrs CA course and in which institution.
Thank you.
KETAN J SHAH
26 July 2017 at 12:57
respected Sirs,
I am a Landlord and my property is in Mumbai. In 1970 the property is leased to a Nationalised Bank. with a monthly Rent of Rs.0.75 ps per sq.ft for 3765 sq.ft area. The Lease was for 75 years with 3 options of renewal at interval of 25 years each. In 1984 additional 1000 sq.ft was leased to Bank with a monthly Rent of Rs.6/- per sq.ft for this premises. After the end of first lease period and with continuos corespondance with Bank the Rent was increased to Rs.15/- per sq.ft for both the premises with 4% permitted increase every year.. The offer letter sent to me was for 10 years and 4 options of 10 years for renewal. However when the fresh agreement was sent to me it contained the clause that the renewal lease would be for 50 years and No Option of Rent revision.
Now today the Rentals in our area in Ghatkopar are Rs.300 to Rs.400 per sq.ft. I requested to Bank for upward revision but Bank says they will not entertain any request by me until the expiry of Lease period which expires in 2044. I have been in constant correspondance with Bank for increase in Rent but Bank is not ready . I told the Bank that just for one sentence that the Rent to remain the same till end of the lease period I should not be penalised and made to loose the monetary benefits. I do not have any other business and I am totally dependant on the Rent . But Bank officers are not ready to listen.
In todays life it is very difficult to manage with such meager Rent. In fact Bank has increased the Rent of many of its other Branches in Mumbai. But they are not ready to discuss the matter with me.
I can go for litigation as I am having the original offer letter and all other corespondance entered into with Bank but as it would take many years to get a result at present i do not intend to enter into any litigation.
I humbly request you to suggest me somre means by which without entering into any litigation I can convince the Bank for increase in Rent.
Awaiting your reply and Thanking you in advance
Member (Account Deleted)
26 July 2017 at 12:46
In my village Rama Temple is there still now we are doing any pooja because of its incomplete construction, lack of money problem, So i heard somewhere it's better to put a Charity on the name of Temple you can get some donations, So could you please help me the process to put a Trust on the name of Temple.
Name- Venkat
Contact - 9493928299
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Advice
Regards a case under section 498a. The x-exam of complainant completed after 9 yrs. after issuing W/A (bailable) twice. In last 10 months none of the witnesses (3) including I/O have turned up to date. Each witness were served 3 summons and two of them were served W/A (bailable) twice. section 340 pending against complainant. What step can be taken to expedite the matter.